Application of Scholars' High-Score Topic Tags in Precision Profile Building of Small-Peer Scholars

Wu Junhong, Zheng Xinyu, Tang Liyun, Sun Jun

Knowledge Management Forum ›› 2026, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (1) : 61-67.

PDF(3002 KB)
PDF(3002 KB)
Knowledge Management Forum ›› 2026, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (1) : 61-67. DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.2095-5472.2026.006  CSTR: 32306.14.CN11-6036.2026.006
Pioneering Exploration of AI-Empowered Knowledge Management and Services

Application of Scholars' High-Score Topic Tags in Precision Profile Building of Small-Peer Scholars

Author information +
History +

Abstract

[Purpose/Significance] Scholar profiles are widely applied in various precision services within the academic field, such as paper review, project evaluation, targeted recommendations, and talent recruitment. Topic tags play a critical role in identifying scholars in the same specialized subfield. This paper optimizes the method for calculating scholar topic tags to more accurately identify scholars within specific subdisciplines. [Method/Process] This paper proposed a theoretical framework: scholar profiles should comprehensively incorporate evaluation information such as scholars' research interests and academic capabilities, while also reflecting their research fields and academic standing within those fields. This paper integrated topic tags with evaluation data, using the latter as a factor for weighting topic tags. An algorithm was proposed for calculating high-scoring topic tags for scholars, incorporating three dimensions: the quantity of published papers, the author's position in the author list, and the citations of the papers. [Result/Conclusion] From the perspective of individual scholar profiling, high-score topic tags can delineate the main specialized research areas of a scholar. For the need to identify experts within a discipline, high-score topic tags can help pinpoint the most outstanding and core scholars in that field.

Key words

scholar profile / scholar topic tag / small-peer expert / peer review / paper review

Cite this article

Download Citations
Wu Junhong , Zheng Xinyu , Tang Liyun , et al. Application of Scholars' High-Score Topic Tags in Precision Profile Building of Small-Peer Scholars[J]. Knowledge Management Forum. 2026, 11(1): 61-67 https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.2095-5472.2026.006

References

[1]
王世奇, 刘智锋, 王继民.学者画像研究综述[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(20): 73-81.
WANG S Q, LIU Z F, WANG J M. A review of scholar profiling research[J]. Library and information service, 2022, 66(20): 73-81.
[2]
池雪花.学者精准画像的自动构建研究[D]. 南京:南京理工大学, 2019.
CHI X H. Constructing precise profile of scholars automatically[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Science & Technology, 2019.
[3]
赵刚, 姚兴仁.基于用户画像的异常行为检测模型[J]. 信息网络安全, 2017(7): 18-24.
ZHAO G, YAO X R. Anomaly detection model based on user portrait[J]. Netinfo security, 2017(7): 18-24.
[4]
谢鹏.面向学术文献的学者兴趣标签识别方法[J]. 情报工程, 2019, 5(3): 65-73.
XIE P. Recognition of scholar interest tag for academic literatures[J]. Technology intelligence engineering, 2019, 5(3): 65-73.
[5]
池雪花, 刘丽帆, 章成志.基于学术论文的学者研究兴趣标签发现研究[J]. 情报工程, 2019, 5(2): 28-39.
CHI X H, LIU L F, ZHANG C Z. Analysis of scholars research interest tag discovery based on academic papers[J]. Technology intelligence engineering, 2019, 5(2): 28-39.
[6]
石湘, 刘萍.学者研究兴趣识别综述[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2022, 6(4): 16-27.
SHI X, LIU P. Review of studies identifying research interests[J]. Data analysis and knowledge discovery, 2022, 6(4): 16-27.
[7]
熊回香, 杨雪萍, 蒋武轩, 等.基于学术能力及合作关系网络的学者推荐研究[J]. 情报科学, 2019, 37(5): 71-78.
XIONG H X, YANG X P, JIANG W X, et al. Scholars recommend research based on academic competence and collaborative networks[J]. Information science, 2019, 37(5): 71-78.
[8]
熊回香, 杜瑾, 代沁泉, 等.基于主题与多维计量指标的学者学术影响力评价研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2021, 44(8): 22-27, 21.
XIONG H X, DU J, DAI Q Q, et al. Scholars academic influence evaluation research based on topics and multi-dimensional metrics[J]. Information studies: theory & application, 2021, 44(8): 22-27, 21.
[9]
陈翀, 李楠, 梁冰, 等.基于成果特征的学者学术专长识别方法[J]. 图书情报工作, 2019, 63(20): 96-103.
CHEN C, LI N, LIANG B, et al. Identifying expertise tags of scholars by multiple features of academic publications[J]. Library and information service, 2019, 63(20): 96-103.
[10]
张洋, 黄子萱, 朱嘉麒.青年科技人才画像及鉴识方法研究[J]. 情报学报, 2024, 43(11): 1283-1296.
ZHANG Y, HUANG Z X, ZHU J Q. Research on the profile and identification method of young scientific and technological talents[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2024, 43(11): 1283-1296.
[11]
范晓玉, 窦永香, 赵捧未, 等. 融合多源数据的科研人员画像构建方法研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018, 62(15): 31-40.
FAN X Y, DOU Y X, ZHAO P W, et al. Study for the construction method of scientist profile with multi-source data fusion[J]. Library and information service, 2018, 62(15): 31-40.
[12]
MERTON R K. The Matthew effect in science: the reward and communication systems of science are considered[J]. Science, 1968, 159(3810): 56-63.
[13]
TSCHARNTKE T, HOCHBERG M E, RAND T A, et al. Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications[J]. PLoS biology, 2007, 5(1): 13-14.
[14]
伍军红, 郑新宇, 孙隽, 等.基于知网数据的高被引学者评价方法[J]. 知识管理论坛, 2025, 10(3): 232-240.
WU J H, ZHENG X Y, SUN J, et al. Evaluation method for highly cited scholars based on CNKI data[J]. Knowledge management forum, 2025, 10(3): 232-240.
[15]
伍军红, 肖宏, 任美亚, 等.PCSI:一种单篇论文被引频次标准化方法[J]. 图书情报工作, 2020, 64(23): 22-30.
WU J H, XIAO H, REN M Y, et al. Paper citation standardized index(PCSI): a new index to quantitatively evaluate scientific articles based on citation[J]. Library and information service, 2020, 64(23): 22-30.
PDF(3002 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/