
Research on Relationship Between Scholars' Scientific Research Cooperation and Interdisciplinarity Based on Social Network——Taking Scholars in Astrophysics as an Example
Yin Xi, Li Zexia
Knowledge Management Forum ›› 2023, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (3) : 193-201.
Research on Relationship Between Scholars' Scientific Research Cooperation and Interdisciplinarity Based on Social Network——Taking Scholars in Astrophysics as an Example
[Purpose/Significance] The study explored the relationship between scholars' scientific research cooperation and interdisciplinarity, in order to provide suggestions for scholars engaged in interdisciplinary research to improve their own cooperation modes, and evidence for optimizing cooperation strategies in the process of cultivating interdisciplinary talents. [Method/Process] Scholars are selected according to Price core author distribution theory. Based on Web of Science data, the study constructed the co-occurrence network of authors, used node degree centrality to measure the scale of cooperation, node clustering coefficient to measure the group cooperation rate, and proportion of international cooperation papers to measure the international cooperation rate; measured interdisciplinarity of scholars based on Rao-stirling. From the individual level, analyzed the relationship between scientific research cooperation and interdisciplinarity. [Result/Conclusion] Taking scholars in astrophysics as an example, the study found that the cooperation scale, group and international cooperation rate of scholars are significantly positively correlated with their interdisciplinarity. They are the factors that affect scholars' interdisciplinarity. And then infer that expansion of cooperation scale, participating in teamwork and international cooperation will all help them absorb more interdisciplinary knowledge, improve knowledge structure, and produce high-quality researches.
scientific research collaboration / interdisciplinarity / social network / bibliometrics
[1] |
王孜丹, 杜鹏, 马新勇. 从交叉学科到学科交叉:美国案例及启示[J].科学通报,2021,66(9): 965-973..
|
[2] |
PORTER A, ROESSNER J, COHEN A, et al. Interdisciplinary research: meaning, metrics and nurture[J]. Research evaluation,2006,15(3): 187-195.
|
[3] |
Committee on Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research. Facilitating interdisciplinary research[R].Washington, DC: National Academies Press,2005.
|
[4] |
樊春良, 樊天. 国外学科交叉研究的发展趋势及启示[J].中国科学基金,2019,33(5): 446-452.
|
[5] |
朱蔚彤. 国家自然科学基金委员会资助学科交叉研究模式分析[J].中国科学基金,2006(3): 184-189.
|
[6] |
Klein J T, Falk krzesinski H J. Interdisciplinary and collaborative work: framing promotion and tenure practices and policies[J].Research policy,2017,46(6): 1055-1061.
|
[7] |
曾粤亮, 司莉. 跨学科科研合作:背景、理论研究与实践进展[J].图书情报工作,2021,65(10): 127-140.
|
[8] |
杨文晖. 磁共振成像发展与超高场磁共振成像技术[J].物理,2019,48(4): 227-236.
|
[9] |
Pessoa J, Dias G J, Silva T M, et al. On interdisciplinary collaborations in scientific coauthorship networks: the case of the Brazilian community[J].Scientometrics,2020,124(3): 2341-2360.
|
[10] |
Lindgreen A, Benedetto D. How to undertake great cross-disciplinary research[J].Industrial marketing management,2020,90: 1-5.
|
[11] |
Diana R, Stephanie P. Women in interdisciplinary science: exploring preferences and consequences[J]. Research policy,2007,36(1): 0-75.
|
[12] |
Rijnsoever F J V, Hessels L K. Factors associated with disciplinary and interdisciplinary research collaboration[J].Research policy,2011,40(3): 463-472.
|
[13] |
Feng S, Kirkley A. Mixing patterns in interdisciplinary co-authorship networks at multiple scales[J].Scientific Reports,2020,10(1): 773.
|
[14] |
Milman A, Bolson J, Marston J M, et al. Scholarly motivations to conduct interdisciplinary climate change research [J].Journal of environmental studies and sciences,2017,7(2): 239-250.
|
[15] |
张琳, 孙蓓蓓, 黄颖. 交叉科学研究:内涵、测度与影响[J].科研管理,2020,41(7): 279-288.
|
[16] |
胡泽文, 崔静静, 任萍. 国内科研合作研究进展综述[J].现代情报,2022,42(6): 148-159.
|
[17] |
Pierce S J. Boundary crossing in research literatures as a means of interdisciplinary information transfer[J].Journal of documentation,1993,49(4): 370-408.
|
[18] |
刘雪立,赵俊玲. 图书情报学期刊和论文的跨学科强度与其学术影响力的关系[J].中国科技期刊研究,2021,32(3): 411-417.
|
[19] |
张雪, 刘昊, 张志强. 不同合作模式下的学科交叉程度与文献学术影响力关系研究[J].情报杂志,2021,40(8): 164-172.
|
[20] |
李江. “跨学科性”的概念框架与测度[J].图书情报知识,2014(3): 87-93.
|
[21] |
崔林蔚. 学术影响力的性别差异:学者跨学科性的视角[J].科学学研究,2023,41(5): 777-786.
|
[22] |
徐璐, 李长玲, 荣国阳. 期刊的跨学科引用对跨学科知识输出的影响研究——以图书情报领域为例[J].情报杂志,2021,40(7): 182-188.
|
[23] |
丁学东. 文献计量学基础[M].北京: 北京大学出版社,1992.
|
[24] |
Steverson K, Zelen M. Rethinking centrality: methods and examples[J].Social networks, 1989,11(1): 1-37.
|
[25] |
Dimitropoulos X, Krioukov D, Fomenkov M, et al. As relationships inference and validation[J].Sigcomm computer communications reviews,2007,37(1): 29-40.
|
[26] |
Stirling A. A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society[J].Journal of the Royal Society Interface,2007,4(15): 707-719.
|
[27] |
张雪, 张志强. 学科交叉研究系统综述[J].图书情报工作,2020,64(14): 112-125.
|
[28] |
Chavarro D, Tang P, Rafols I. Interdisciplinarity and research on local issues: evidence from a developing country[J].Research evaluation,2014,23(3): 195-209.
|
[29] |
Taskin Z, Aydinoglu A U. Collaborative interdisciplinary astrobiology research: a bibliometric study of the NASA Astrobiology Institute[J].Scientometrics,2015,103 (3): 1003-1022.
|
[30] |
康旭东, 王前, 郭东明. 科研团体建设的若干理论问题[J].科学学研究,2005(2): 232-236.
|
[31] |
王文平, 刘云, 何颖, 等. 国际科技合作对跨学科研究影响的评价研究——基于文献计量学分析的视角[J].科研管理,2015,36 (3): 127-137.
|
殷茜:收集与分析数据,撰写论文;
李泽霞:修改论文。
/
〈 |
|
〉 |