Research on Personal Smart Connection Service in Everyday Life Scenarios

Guo Lu; Fan Wei

doi:10.13266/j.issn.2095-5472.2020.004

PDF(1206 KB)

Knowledge Management Forum ›› 2020, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (1) : 36-46. DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.2095-5472.2020.004

Research on Personal Smart Connection Service in Everyday Life Scenarios

Guo Lu ,
Fan Wei

Author information +

History +

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] From the perspective of everyday life scenario, this paper studies the way App and hardware provide smart information service for users with automation, initiative and personalization. [Method/process] First, this paper analyzed the significance and elements of the context and classified the main personal context types according to user’s everyday life scenarios. Then, it analyzed the connections between user, APP, and smart hardware, and the data flow in the context and studied the design of "IF-THEN" logic rules and the corresponding practice of trigger-action programming. Finally, this paper compared typical examples of smart services based on trigger-action programming. [Result/Conclusion] This paper proposes a flow design based on "IF-THEN" logic and trigger-action programming for smart information service in personal everyday life, which could create the basis of the theory and implementation of service design for the integration of new scenes.

Key words

everyday life scenario / connections / IF-THEN / smart service

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

Guo Lu , Fan Wei. Research on Personal Smart Connection Service in Everyday Life Scenarios[J]. Knowledge Management Forum. 2020, 5(1): 36-46 https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.2095-5472.2020.004

References

List( Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within ) Chart analysis

[1]	SAVOLAINEN R. Everyday life information seeking: approaching information seeking in the context of “way of life” [J]. Library & information science research, 1995, 17(3):259-294 Cited in this article [1]

[2]	吴丹, 梁少博. 多设备环境下网络信息搜索行为研究综述[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2015, 41(6):109-127 Cited in this article [1]

[3]	BAWDEN D. The turn: integration of information seeking and information retrieval in context[J]. Journal of documentation, 2005, 43(2):821-822 Cited in this article [1]

[4]	场景实验室. 2018年场景白皮书[EB/OL]. [2019-11-11]. http://www.199it.com/archives/734109.html Cited in this article [1]

[5]	刘强, 崔莉, 陈海明. 物联网关键技术与应用[J]. 计算机科学, 2010, 37(6):1-4 Cited in this article [1]

[6]	周晓杰, 刘海昕, 张春杨. 我国图书馆嵌入式服务研究述评[J]. 图书馆学研究, 2012(12):19-22 Cited in this article [1]

[7]	CHEN G, KOTZ D. A survey of context-aware mobile computing research[R]. Technical Report TR2000-381. Hanover: Dept. of Computer Science, Dartmouth College, 2000 Cited in this article [1]

[8]	KO H, RAMOS C. A survey of context classification for intelligent systems research for Ambient Intelligence[C]//Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems (CISIS), 2010 International Conference on. Washington: IEEE, 2010: 746-751 Cited in this article [1]

[9]	吴声. 场景革命[M]. 北京：机械工业出版社, 2015:197-220 Cited in this article [1]

[10]	中国产业信息网. 2016年中国人工智能应用领域分析[EB/OL]. [2019-11-11]. http://www.chyxx.com/industry/201612/482350.html Cited in this article [1]

[11]	中国互联网络信息中心. 第44次中国互联网络发展状况统计报告[EB/OL]. [2019-11-11]. http://www.cnnic.net.cn/hlwfzyj/hlwxzbg/hlwtjbg/201908/P020190830356787490958.pdf Cited in this article [1]

[12]	肖永英, 何兰满. 国外日常生活信息查询行为研究进展(2001-2010)[J]. 图书情报工作, 2012, 56(5):112-118 Cited in this article [1]

[13]	BATES M J. The design of browsing and berrypicking techniques for the online search interface[J]. Online review, 1989, 13(5): 407-424 Cited in this article [1]

[14]	DEY A K, SOHN T, STRENG S, et al. iCAP: interactive prototyping of context-aware applications[C]// International conference on pervasive computing. Berlin: Springer, 2006:254-271 Cited in this article [1]

[15]	HOY M B. If this then that: an introduction to automated task services[J]. Medical reference services quarterly, 2015, 34(1): 98-103 Cited in this article [1]

[16]	GHIANI G, MANCA M, PATERNO F, et al. Individualization of context-dependent applications through trigger-action rules[J]. ACM transactions on computer-human interaction, 2017, 24(2):1-33 Cited in this article [1]

[17]	HUANG J, CAKMAK M. Supporting mental model accuracy in trigger-action programming[C]// Proceedings of the 2015 ACM international joint conference on pervasive and ubiquitous computing. New York: ACM, 2015: 215-225 Cited in this article [1]

[18]	UR B, MCMANUS E, HO M P Y, et al. Practical trigger-action programming in the smart home[C]//Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. New York: ACM, 2014: 803-812 Cited in this article [1]

[19]	Wikipedia. End-user development [EB/OL]. [2019-11-11]. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/End-user_development Cited in this article [1]

[20]	CORNO F, DE RUSSIS L, ROFFARELLO A M. A semantic web approach to simplifying trigger-action programming in the IoT[J]. Computer, 2017, 50(11): 18-24 Cited in this article [1]

[21]	DESOLDA G, ARDITO C, MATERA M. Empowering end users to customize their smart environments: model, composition paradigms, and domain-specific tools[J]. ACM transactions on computer-human interaction, 2017, 24(2): 12 Cited in this article [1]

[22]	PARECKI A. OAuth 2.0 [EB/OL]. [2020-01-26]. https://oauth.net/2/ Cited in this article [1]

[23]	O'REILLY T. Pipes and filters for the Internet [EB/OL]. [2019-11-11]. http://radar.oreilly.com/2007/02/pipes-and-filters-for-the-inte.html Cited in this article [1]

[24]	Zapier. What is Zapier? [EB/OL]. [2019-11-11]. https://zapier.com/learn/getting-started-guide/what-is-zapier/ Cited in this article [1]

[25]	WEARE K. Microsoft flow reaches general availability[EB/OL].[2019-11-11]. https://www.infoq.com/news/2016/11/microsoft-flow-ga Cited in this article [1]

[26]	Microsoft Flow.自动化进程+任务[EB/OL].[2019-11-11]. https://flow.microsoft.com/zh-cn/ Cited in this article [1]

[27]	Google Play. The winners of the 2017 Google Play Awards [EB/OL]. [2019-11-11]. https://blog.google/products/google-play/winners-2017-google-play-awards-are/ Cited in this article [1]

[28]	RAHMATI A, FERNANDES E, JUNG J, et al. IFTTT vs. Zapier: a comparative study of trigger-action programming frameworks[J/OL]. arXiv:1709.02788, 2017[2020-01-20]. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017arXiv170902788R Cited in this article [1]