A Contrastive Study of Practical Modes of Data Publishing——Take the Field of Earth Science as an Example

Han Lu, Ding Yi

Knowledge Management Forum ›› 2019, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (3) : 152-162.

PDF(768 KB)
PDF(768 KB)
Knowledge Management Forum ›› 2019, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (3) : 152-162. DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.2095-5472.2019.016

A Contrastive Study of Practical Modes of Data Publishing——Take the Field of Earth Science as an Example

Author information +
History +

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] Scientific data publishing is the main mode of academic communication for data-intensive scientific discovery, which is of great significance for data reuse and scientific verification. [Method/process] Earth sciences has undergone a great change from the data sharing model to the current data publishing. Current practices of data publishing can be divided into three modes: data journal publishing, data warehousing publishing, data and paper joint publishing. The author made statistics and comparison on the practice methods and key elements of each mode, and emphatically analyzed the advantages and disadvantages of the three modes, peer data review issues and the importance of hierarchical metadata in geoscience data publishing. [Result/conclusion] Through research, the author proposes that warehouse-based publishing facilitates integration into scientific data management process and facilitates data reuse. However, such publishing mode usually lacks peer review. Peer review of data should be different from academic papers and should focus on the reusability of data in the process of participating in scientific research and producing regenerative results. The hierarchical description of metadata is of great significance to the preservation and reuse of geoscience big data.

Key words

data publication / data repository / data journal / geoscience data

Cite this article

Download Citations
Han Lu , Ding Yi. A Contrastive Study of Practical Modes of Data Publishing——Take the Field of Earth Science as an Example[J]. Knowledge Management Forum. 2019, 4(3): 152-162 https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.2095-5472.2019.016

References

[1]
诸云强, 朱琦, 冯卓,等. 科学大数据开放共享机制研究及其对环境信息共享的启示[J]. 中国环境管理, 2015, 7(6):38-45.
[2]
王卷乐, 孙九林. 世界数据中心(WDC)回顾、变革与展望[J]. 地球科学进展, 2009, 24(6):612-620.
[3]
诸云强, 孙九林, 廖顺宝,等. 地球系统科学数据共享研究与实践[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2010, 2010(1):1-8.
[4]
吴立宗, 南卓铜, 王亮绪. 科学数据出版——促进数据共享的一种新模式[J]. 中国科技资源导刊, 2014(5):72-78.
[5]
EAR Division Data Sharing Policy [EB/OL].[2018-12-18]. . https://www.nsf.gov/geo/geo-data-policies/ear/ear-data-policy-apr2018.pdf.
[6]
何琳, 常颖聪. 国内外科学数据出版研究进展[J]. 图书情报工作, 2014, 58(5):104-110.
[7]
BRASE J, FARQUHAR A, GRUTTEMEIER H, et al. Approach for a joint global registration agency for research data[J]. Information services & use, 2009, 29(1):13-27.
[8]
KRATZ J E, STRASSER C. Researcher perspectives on publication and peer review of data[J]. PLOS ONE, 2015, 10(2):e0117619.
[9]
李丹丹, 吴振新. 研究数据引用研究[J]. 图书馆杂志, 2013, 32(5):65-71.
[10]
PRONK T E,WIERSMA P H,VAN WEERDEN A,et al. A game theoretic analysis of research data sharing[J].Peer J,2015(3):e1242.
[11]
WDS[EB/OL].[2018-12-18].http://www.icsu-wds.org/organization/intro-to-wds.
[12]
WATERMAN K J, SIERMAN B. Survey of DSA-certified digital repositories : report on the findings in a survey of all DSA-certified digital repositories on investments in and benefits of acquiring the Data Seal of Approval (DSA) [R]. Hague: Netherlands Coalition for Digital Preservation, 2016:19.
[13]
CoreTrustSeal[EB/OL].[2019-01-12]. https://www.coretrustseal.org/about/.
[14]
黄如花, 李楠. 开放数据的许可协议类型研究[J]. 图书馆, 2016(8):16-21.
[15]
Data Citation Synthesis Group. Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles [EB/OL]. [2018-02-18].https://www.force11.org/group/joint-declaration-data-citation-principles-final.
[16]
DataCite Metadata Working Group. DataCite Metadata Schema for the Publication and Citation of Research Data[EB/ OL].[2018-02-18]. http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-4.0/doc/DataCite-MetadataKernel_v4.0.pdf.
[17]
王丹丹. 科学数据出版平台的用户测试研究[J]. 情报资料工作, 2017(6):58-63.
[18]
National Aeronautics and Space Administration—Global Change Master Directory. Directory Interchange Format (DIF) Writer’s Guide[EB/OL].[2017-10-15]. http://gcmd.nasa.gov/add/difguide/.
[19]
GIL Y, DAVID C H, DEMIR I, et al. Toward the geoscience paper of the future: best practices for documenting and sharing research from data to software to provenance[J]. Earth and space science, 2016, 3(10): 388-415.
[20]
LAWRENCE B, JONES C, MATTHEWS B, et al. Citation and peer review of data: moving towards formal data publication[J]. International journal of digital curation, 2011, 6(2):4-37.
[21]
屈宝强, 王凯. 数据出版视角下的科学数据同行评议[J]. 图书馆杂志, 2017, 36(10):71-77.

韩 露:论文相关的数据采集,数据出版关键问题的研究与论文撰写;

丁 毅:数据仓储研究和数据出版流程实践。

PDF(768 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/