
Decision Service Modeling of Product Design Process Based on Knowledge Crystallization Theory
Wu Xiaofeng, Gao Feng
Knowledge Management Forum ›› 2019, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (2) : 59-68.
Decision Service Modeling of Product Design Process Based on Knowledge Crystallization Theory
[Purpose/significance] This paper aims to serve the decision-making of solutions to problems in the product design process, meet the demand of knowledge retrieval and reuse, and guarantee the sustainable development of products. [Method/process] Based on the double-cycle model of knowledge crystallization, it found that there are problems in the existing IBIS (issue-based Information System) model and its improvement model. Therefore, the knowledge crystallization double cycle model was used to connect the discussion dialogue model and the product design process, to construct the ‘IBIS representation supporting the product double cycle model’. In the original discussion dialogue model, ‘take the large or fetch small operators’ was used in fuzzy comprehensive decision making. However, because of this operator, some useful elements will be invalid, so ‘take the large or fetch small operators’ was replaced by the Einstain operator. [Results/conclusions] The Einstain operator draws on the idea of ‘take the large or fetch small operators’ to ignore the useless value data, and highly reducts the data at both ends. The IBIS representation supporting the product double cycle model has made the product design process decision service modeling based on the knowledge crystallization double cycle theory has a basic model framework, and the improved discussion dialogue model makes the core algorithm reliable.
double-cycle model of knowledge crystallization / the product's double -cycle model / IBIS expression / Einstain operators
[1] |
王飞跃.知识产生方式和科技决策支撑的重大变革——面向大数据和开源信息的科技态势解析与决策服务[J].中国科学院院刊,2012,27(5):527-537.
|
[2] |
VROOM V H,YETTON P W. Leadership and decision-making[M]. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press,1973,18(2):3-9.
|
[3] |
BUTLER R. Strategic decision[M]. Boston: Springer,1998:35-50.
|
[4] |
CHURCHLAND A K, KIANI R, SHADLEN M N. Decision-making with multiple alternatives[J].Nature neuroscience,2008,11(6):693-702.
|
[5] |
李武,席酉民,成思危.群体决策过程组织研究述评[J].管理科学学报,2002(2):55-66.
|
[6] |
邹瑜.关于工程咨询企业信息化的思考[J].中国工程咨询,2013(7):16-20.
|
[7] |
秦飞巍,李路野,高曙明.设计理性研究进展[J].计算机辅助设计与图形学学报,2012,24(10):1283-1293.
|
[8] |
CONKLIN J,SELVIN A,SHUM S B .Facilitated hypertext for collective sensemaking: 15 years on from g IBIS[C]//LAP'03:8th international working conference on the language-action per-spective on communication modelling. New York: ACM,2003: 1-19.
|
[9] |
BUCKINGHAM SHUM S, SELVIN A M, SIERHUIS M, et al. Hypermedia support for argumentation-based rationale: 15 years on from gIBIS and QOC[M]// DUTOIT A H, McCALL R, MISTRIK I, et al. Rationale management in software engineering. Berlin: Springer, 2006:111-132.
|
[10] |
SUN F,CAI G. Community issue review: crystallizing knowledge for encouraging civic engagement[C]// Proceedings of the 18th annual international conference on digital government research pages. New York: ACM,2017:260-269.
|
[11] |
吴晓凤,高峰,蔡国瑞.正反冰山模型与知识晶炼理论的融合发展[J].图书馆理论与实践,2019(2):37-42.
|
[12] |
KUNZ W, RITTEL H. Issues as elements of information systems[R].Berkeley: University of California, Center for Planning and Development Research,1970.
|
[13] |
张应中,罗晓芳,陈钎.产品设计原理语义表达[J].机械工程学报,2012,48(17):135-143.
|
[14] |
YAKEMOVIC K C B,BURGESS Y E,JEFFREY C. Report on a development project use of an issue-based information system[C]// Proceedings of the conference on computer-supported cooperative work. Trier: DBLP,1990: 105-18.
|
[15] |
QUINSAN C, JEAN-PIERRE P. Managing design information: issue-based information systems and fuzzy reasoning system[J].Design studies,1999,20 (4):343-362.
|
[16] |
TOKTAM E, MARYAM P, MARTIN P. A collaborative Web-based uy6 issue based information system (IBIS) framework [EB/OL]. [2018-12-21]. Dunedin: University of Otago, 2009.
|
[17] |
李路野,秦飞巍,高曙明.有效支持设计知识检索和重用的扩展的设计理性表示[J].计算机辅助设计与图形学学报,2013,25(10):1514-1522.
|
[18] |
谭俊峰,张朋柱,黄丽宁.综合集成研讨厅中的研讨信息组织模型[J].系统工程理论与实践,2005,25(1):86-92.
|
[19] |
陈俊良,陈超,姜鑫,等.基于IBIS和Toulmin辩论形式的群体研讨模型[J].计算机应用,2011,31(9):2526-2529.
|
[20] |
陈宁.Toulmin推断模型在考试效度论证中的应用[J].中国考试,2012(4):15-21.
|
[21] |
XU Z S. On generalized induced linguisitic aggregation operators[J].International journal of general system,2006,35(1):17-28.
|
吴晓凤:论文撰写与修改;
高 峰:论文写作指导。
/
〈 |
|
〉 |