The Mapping Analysis Between the Cooperative Patent Classification System (CPC) and the International Patent Classification System (IPC)

Bai Linlin, Zhu Zhongming

Knowledge Management Forum ›› 2017, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (5) : 398-405.

PDF(1211 KB)
PDF(1211 KB)
Knowledge Management Forum ›› 2017, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (5) : 398-405. DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.2095-5472.2017.043

The Mapping Analysis Between the Cooperative Patent Classification System (CPC) and the International Patent Classification System (IPC)

Author information +
History +

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] A detailed comparison of the mapping between the Cooperative Patent Classification System (CPC) and the International Patent Classification System (IPC) is intended to provide references for the use of CPC and IPC for patent classification.[Method/process] This paper made a detailed mapping number analysis between CPC and IPC in terms of the class, subclass, group and subgroup on their common A-H sections. [Result/conclusion] The classification principle between the Cooperative Patent Classification System (CPC) and the International Patent Classification System (IPC) is basically consistent and CPC is more subdivided than the IPC. The “2000 series (indexing)” and the Y section of the new technology are added, showing CPC’s high extensibility. We believe that as a strong compatibility and high degree classification system, CPC will become an efficient tool to improve the efficiency of retrieval and optimize the review quality.

Key words

Cooperative Patent Classification System (CPC) / International Patent Classification System (IPC) / mapping analysis

Cite this article

Download Citations
Bai Linlin , Zhu Zhongming. The Mapping Analysis Between the Cooperative Patent Classification System (CPC) and the International Patent Classification System (IPC)[J]. Knowledge Management Forum. 2017, 2(5): 398-405 https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.2095-5472.2017.043

References

[1]
卢慧生, 林小露.联合专利分类体系发展与应用现状[J]. 中国发明与专利, 2015(4): 47-53.
[2]
Five IP offices homepage [EB/OL]. [2017-05-25]. http://www.fiveipoffices.org/index.html.
[3]
Cooperative Patent Classification - Objectives [EB/OL]. [2017-05-26]. http://www.cooperativepatentclassification.org/obj.html.
[4]
廖佳佳, 高菲, 吕良. 联合专利分类体系研究[J]. 现代情报, 2014, 34(1): 64-68.
[5]
李鹏. 国际专利分类的困境与出路——IPC的发展与展望[J]. 中国发明与专利, 2009(8): 76-79.
[6]
PCT – The International Patent System [EB/OL]. [2017-05-28]. http://www.wipo.int/pct/en/.
[7]
李真魏, 巧莲. 联合专利分类CPC系统介绍[J]. 专利文献研究, 2014(2): 10-13.
[8]
朱新超, 霍翠婷, 刘会景. 合作专利分类系统(CPC)与传统专利分类系统的比较分析[J]. 数字图书馆论坛, 2013(9): 38-44.

白林林:负责论文的数据获取、提纲与撰写;

祝忠明:负责论文的修订。

PDF(1211 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/