Evaluation and Comparative Study of C9 League and Asian First-class Universities Based on Informetrics

Tian Ji, Shen Lihua, He Xiaowei, Yu Minjie

Knowledge Management Forum ›› 2017, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (5) : 359-369.

PDF(1272 KB)
PDF(1272 KB)
Knowledge Management Forum ›› 2017, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (5) : 359-369. DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.2095-5472.2017.039

Evaluation and Comparative Study of C9 League and Asian First-class Universities Based on Informetrics

Author information +
History +

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] It is important for developing our first- class universities to show the main features of universities in C9 League, and reveal the gaps between universities in C9 League and other top universities. [Method/process] Selecting universities in C9 League and other Asian first-class universities as examples, it performed the statistical analysis of their informetric characteristics. This paper found out the overall profile and major characteristics of these universities. [Result/conclusion] China’s top universities have developed rapidly in recent years, especially in the total academic output, but we need more efforts to improve our academic influence.

Key words

informetrics / Asian first-class university / C9 League

Cite this article

Download Citations
Tian Ji , Shen Lihua , He Xiaowei , et al. Evaluation and Comparative Study of C9 League and Asian First-class Universities Based on Informetrics[J]. Knowledge Management Forum. 2017, 2(5): 359-369 https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.2095-5472.2017.039

References

[1]
VAN RANN A F J. Bibliometric statistical properties of the 100 largest European research universities: prevalent scaling rules in the science system[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2008, 59(3): 461-475.
[2]
蒋颖. 人文社会科学领域文献计量学研究[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2013.
[3]
赵飞, 艾春艳, 游越, 等. 基于文献计量开展高校科研评估的探索与思考——以北京大学科研竞争力评估为例[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2014(1): 97-101.
[4]
张闪闪. 信息计量方法在我国高校学科评估中的应用——以郑州大学为例[J]. 新世纪图书馆, 2014(11): 90-96.
[5]
宣小红. 大学排行评价指标体系的比较研究[J]. 教育研究, 2007(12): 47-54.
[6]
刘薇. 中国C9 与美国CIC大学联盟之比较分析[J]. 长春教育学院学报, 2013(7): 86-88.
[7]
姜华, 刘苗苗. 中国“C9”与澳大利亚“G8”联盟一流学科之比较分析——基于ESI和InCites数据库[J]. 中国高教研究, 2017(6): 67-81.
[8]
李昂. 比较“常春藤”联盟看中国C9大学联盟的未来发展[J]. 黄山学院学报, 2012(6): 107-110.
[9]
邱均平. 信息计量学[M]. 湖北: 武汉大学出版社, 2016.
[10]
国家自然科学基金委主页[EB/OL]. [2016-06-01]. http://www.nsfc.gov.cn/.
[11]
QS World University Rankings[EB/OL]. [2016-02-15]. http://www.topuniversities.com.
[12]
THE世界大学排名[EB/OL]. [2016-03-30].
[13]
WoS检索平台[EB/OL] .[2016-05-30].
[14]
Scopus检索平台[EB/OL]. [2016-05-30].
[15]
Incites检索平台[EB/OL]. [2016-10-30].
[16]
Scival检索平台[EB/OL]. [2016-10-30].
[17]
香港大学教育资助委员会[EB/OL]. [2016-10-30]. http://cdcf.ugc.edu.hk/.
[18]
韩国教育人力资源部[EB/OL]. [2016-10-30]. http://www.academyinfo.go.kr/.
[19]
台湾地区教育统计处[EB/OL]. [2016-10-30].
[20]
田稷, 马景娣. 世界一流研究型大学联盟综合竞争力分析[M]. 杭州: 浙江大学出版社, 2015.

田稷:提出思路,设计论文框架,撰写论文;

沈利华:设计调研框架,分析数据;

何晓薇:获取数据,分析数据;

余敏杰:获取数据,分析数据。

PDF(1272 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/