趋同抑或分化？中外传播学界信息安全研究热点与路径的CiteSpace比较分析

马鹏程

doi:10.13266/j.issn.2095-5472.2026.017

知识管理论坛 ›› 2026, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (3) : 0. DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.2095-5472.2026.017 CSTR: 32306.14.CN11-6036.2026.017

研究论文

趋同抑或分化？中外传播学界信息安全研究热点与路径的CiteSpace比较分析

马鹏程

作者信息 +

Convergence or Divergence? A Comparative Analysis of Knowledge Maps of Information Security Research in Chinese and Western Communication Studies

Ma Pengcheng

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

【目的/意义】旨在揭示数字时代信息安全研究发生“社会文化转向”的背景下，中外传播学界在知识生产与理论视角上的深层差异。通过突破现有研究的“西方中心”局限，为理解全球数字治理中的学术话语分歧与跨文化对话提供经验基础。【方法/过程】选取2009至2024年间Web of Science（WoS）传播学领域与中国知网（CNKI）相关议题的核心文献为样本，运用CiteSpace 6.2.R7软件绘制科学知识图谱。通过关键词共现、聚类分析及突现词探测等方法，系统比较中外学术共同体在研究热点、演进路径及核心框架上的异同。【结果/结论】研究发现，中外信息安全研究呈现出“议题表层趋同、框架深层分化”的特征。虽然双方均高度关注“隐私保护”与“社交媒体”，但国外研究呈现鲜明的“事件驱动”特征，侧重于“监控与权利”的批判性视角，强调个体自由对公权力与资本的制衡；中国研究则呈现显著的“政策驱动”特征，侧重于“治理与发展”的建构性视角，强调国家安全、数据主权与社会秩序的统合。结论指出，信息安全研究呈现“全球议题，本土框架”的图景，反映特定的政治体制与社会语境对学术话语体系的深刻形塑。

Abstract

[Purpose/Significance] This study aims to reveal the deep-seated differences in knowledge production and theoretical perspectives between Chinese and Western communication studies amidst the "socio-cultural turn" of information security research. By transcending the "Western-centric" limitations of existing literature, it provides an empirical basis for understanding academic discourse divergence and fostering cross-cultural dialogue in global digital governance. [Method/Process] Focusing on core literature from the Web of Science (WoS) Communication category and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) between 2009 and 2024, this study employed CiteSpace 6.2.R7 to generate scientific knowledge maps. Through keyword co-occurrence, cluster analysis, and burst detection, it systematically compared the research hotspots, evolutionary paths, and core frameworks of the two academic communities. [Result/Conclusion] The results indicate a characteristic of "surface convergence in topics but deep divergence in frameworks." While both sides share great concerns over "privacy protection" and "social media," Western research exhibits a distinct "event-driven" pattern (e.g., the Snowden revelation), focusing on a critical perspective of "surveillance and rights" that emphasizes the checks of individual liberty against public power and capital. Conversely, Chinese research shows a significant "policy-driven" pattern (e.g., the Cybersecurity Law), focusing on a constructive perspective of "governance and development" that emphasizes the integration of national security, data sovereignty, and social order. The study concludes that information security research depicts a landscape of "Global Issues, Local Frameworks," reflecting how specific political systems and social contexts profoundly shape academic discourses.

导出引用

马鹏程. 趋同抑或分化？中外传播学界信息安全研究热点与路径的CiteSpace比较分析[J]. 知识管理论坛. 2026, 11(3): 0 https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.2095-5472.2026.017

Ma Pengcheng. Convergence or Divergence? A Comparative Analysis of Knowledge Maps of Information Security Research in Chinese and Western Communication Studies[J]. Knowledge Management Forum. 2026, 11(3): 0 https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.2095-5472.2026.017

中图分类号： G206

参考文献

列表( 原文顺序 | 文献年度倒序 | 文中引用次数倒序 ) 可视化分析

[1]	BUCZAK A L, GUVEN E. A survey of data mining and machine learning methods for cyber security[J]. IEEE communications surveys & tutorials, 2016, 18(2), 1153-1176. 本文引用 [1]

[2]	FLORIDI L. The ethics of information[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. 本文引用 [1]

[3]	SOLOVE D J. A taxonomy of privacy[J]. University of Pennsylvania law review, 2006, 154(3): 477-560. 本文引用 [1]

[4]	NISSENBAUM H. Privacy in context: technology, policy, and the integrity of social life[M]. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2010. 本文引用 [1]

[5]	BECK U. Risk society: towards a new modernity[M]. London: Sage Publications, 1992. 本文引用 [1]

[6]	DAS T K, TENG B S. The risk of trust: a conceptual model[J]. Journal of business and industrial marketing, 2004, 19(2): 85-98. 本文引用 [1]

[7]	GREENWALD G. No place to hide: Edward Snowden, the NSA, and the U.S. surveillance state. New York: Metropolitan Books, 2014. 本文引用 [1]

[8]	ZARSKY T. The trouble with algorithmic decisions: an analytic road map to examine efficiency and fairness in automated and opaque decision making[J]. Science, technology, & human values, 2016, 41(1): 118-132. 本文引用 [1]

[9]	刘文彦, 霍树民, 仝青, 等.网络安全评估与分析模型研究[J]. 网络与信息安全学报, 2018, 4(4): 1-11. LIU W Y, HUO S M, TONG Q, et al. Research on network security assessment and analysis model[J]. Chinese journal of network and information security, 2018, 4(4): 1-11. 本文引用 [1]

[10]	CHEN C. CiteSpace: a practical guide for mapping scientific literature[M]. Hauppauge: Nova Science Publishers, 2016. 本文引用 [1]

[11]

杨天平, 段晓敏. 21世纪以来美国教育管理研究的可视化分析——基于《美国教育管理季刊》等五种期刊的文献计量研究[J]. 比较教育研究, 2014(6): 34-41.

YANG

T P

, DUAN

X M

. Visual analysis of educational administration research in the U.S. since the 21st century: Based on bibliometric study of five journals including EAQ[J]. International and comparative education, 2014(6): 34-41.

本文引用 [2]

[12]	谢卫红, 董策, 李忠顺.基于Citespace的商业生态系统研究可视化分析[J]. 现代情报, 2017, 37(2): 126-133, 162. XIE W H, DONG C, LI Z S. Visual analysis of business ecosystem research based on CiteSpace[J]. Modern information, 2017, 37(2): 126-133, 162. 本文引用 [2]

[13]	陈悦, 陈超美, 刘则渊, 等.CiteSpace知识图谱的方法论功能[J]. 科学研究, 2015, 33(2): 242-253. CHEN Y, CHEN C M, LIU Z Y, et al. Methodological function of CiteSpace mapping knowledge domains[J]. Studies in science of science, 2015, 33(2): 242-253. 本文引用 [1]

[14]

顾理平, 范海潮.网络隐私问题十年研究的学术场域——基于CiteSpace可视化科学知识图谱分析(2008—2017)[J]. 新闻与传播研究, 2018, 25(12): 57-73, 127.

L P

, FAN

H C

. The academic field of online privacy issues in the past decade: a visual knowledge mapping analysis based on CiteSpace (2008-2017)[J]. Journalism & communication, 2018, 25(12): 57-73, 127.

本文引用 [1]

[15]	WARREN S D, BRANDEIS L D. The right to privacy[J]. Harvard law review, 1890, 4(5): 193-220. 本文引用 [1]

[16]	HALLIN D C, MANCINI P. Comparing media systems: three models of media and politics[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. 本文引用 [2]

[17]	TAYLOR L. What is data justice? the case for connecting digital rights and freedoms globally[J]. Big data & society, 2017, 4(2): 1-14. 本文引用 [1]

[18]	GIBBONS M, LIMOGES C, NOWOTNY H, et al. The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies[M]. London: Sage Publications, 1994. 本文引用 [1]