[目的/意义] 旨在揭示图书馆智慧教育服务研究现状，明确其在智慧教育中的不可替代作用与价值实现路径，为图书馆精准对接教育需求、构建适配性服务场景提供参考。[方法/过程] 选取CNKI、万方及Web of Science数据库中相关中英文文献，运用文献计量学、科学知识图谱等方法，借助CiteSpace、VOSviewer等软件，从文献时序分布、机构—区域分布、关键词聚类、主题演化及国内外差异等维度开展可视化分析，重点梳理图书馆的作用维度与实践特征。[结果/结论] 研究发现，中英文研究差异折射出国内外在核心驱动机制、技术应用及价值导向的本质不同；高校图书馆是核心阵地，公共图书馆、专业图书馆可在终身学习、职业教育等场景发挥独特作用，形成多元供给体系。研究明确图书馆以“资源中枢、空间载体、素养阵地、生态枢纽”四维价值定位，提出未来应聚焦“资源智联—空间智融—服务智达—生态智治”核心目标，通过优化协作机制、深化技术融合、拓展实践场景、完善评价体系四大路径，推动图书馆智慧教育服务迭代升级，助力智慧教育生态高质量建设和图书馆智慧化转型快速发展。

[Purpose/Significance] This study aims to reveal the current research status of library smart education services, clarify their irreplaceable role and value realization path in smart education, and provide reference for libraries to accurately meet educational needs and build adaptive service scenarios. [Method/Process] Selecting relevant Chinese and English literature from CNKI, Wanfang, and Web of Science databases, using bibliometrics, scientific knowledge graph, and other methods, and utilizing software such as CiteSpace and VOSviewer, visual analysis was conducted from the dimensions of literature temporal distribution, institutional regional distribution, keyword clustering, thematic performance, and domestic and international differences, with a focus on sorting out the role dimensions and practical characteristics of libraries. [Result/Conclusion] The study finds that the differences in research between Chinese and English reflect the essential differences in core driving mechanisms, technological applications, and value orientation between domestic and foreign countries; University libraries are the core battlefield, and public libraries and professional libraries can play a unique role in lifelong learning, vocational education, and other scenarios, forming a diversified supply system. The study clarifies the four-dimensional value positioning of libraries as "resource centers, spatial carriers, literacy platforms, and ecological hubs", and proposes that in the future, the focus should be on the core goals of "resource intelligence connection space intelligence integration service intelligence reach ecological intelligence governance". Through optimizing collaboration mechanisms, deepening technological integration, expanding practical scenarios, and improving evaluation systems, the four paths will promote the iterative upgrading of library smart education services, and help promote the high-quality construction of smart education ecology and the rapid development of library smart transformation.