信任群体智慧还是AI智能?人智融合事实核查对用户信息参与行为的影响研究

吴联仁, 胡亚男, 李瑾颉, 齐佳音

知识管理论坛 ›› 2025, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (4) : 309-320.

PDF(1723 KB)
PDF(1723 KB)
知识管理论坛 ›› 2025, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (4) : 309-320. DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.2095-5472.2025.020  CSTR: 32306.14.CN11-6036.2025.020
研究论文

信任群体智慧还是AI智能?人智融合事实核查对用户信息参与行为的影响研究

作者信息 +

Trust the Crowd-wisdom or AI? Research on the Impact of Human-AI Integration Fact Checking on User Information Engagement Behavior

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

【目的/意义】 事实核查是一种应对虚假信息传播的有效策略,探究事实核查类型中众包事实核查和AI事实核查及其融合对用户信息参与行为的影响,有利于社交媒体平台改进和优化虚假信息治理措施。 【方法/过程】 基于社交媒体平台真实数据,采用方差分析探究众包事实核查和AI事实核查对用户信息参与行为的影响,同时考虑来源可信度的调节作用。 【结果/结论】 实证结果表明,众包事实核查显著影响用户的信息参与行为,正向核查促进用户信息参与行为,负向核查遏制信息参与行为;AI事实核查正向影响用户的信息参与行为,且AI事实核查和众包事实核查融合正向影响用户的信息参与行为;来源可信度正向调节众包事实核查和信息参与行为的关系,也正向调节AI事实核查和信息参与行为的关系。研究结果揭示不同类型事实核查及其融合对用户信息参与行为的影响,为社交媒体平台充分利用群体智慧和AI智能进行虚假信息的事实核查和治理提供理论支持。

Abstract

[Purpose/Significance] Fact-checking is an effective strategy to combat the dissemination of misinformation. Exploring the mechanism of how fact-checking types (crowdsourced and AI fact-checking) influence users' information participation behavior can help social platforms improve and optimize their measures for misinformation governance. [Method/Process] Based on real data from social media platforms, this study used analysis of variance to investigate the impact of fact-checking on users' information participation behavior, while considering the moderating effect of source credibility. [Result/Conclusion] The empirical results show that crowdsourced fact-checking significantly affects users' information engagement behavior, with positive fact-checking promoting information participation behavior and negative fact-checking inhibiting it. AI fact-checking positively influences users' information engagement behavior, and the combination of AI and crowdsourced fact-checking also positively affects users' information engagement behavior. Source credibility positively moderates the relationship between crowdsourced fact-checking and information engagement behavior, as well as the relationship between AI fact-checking and information engagement behavior. This study reveals the impact of different types of fact-checking and their integration on information engagement behavior, providing theoretical support for social media platforms to fully utilize collective intelligence and AI for fact-checking and misinformation governance.

关键词

人智融合 / 众包事实核查 / AI事实核查 / 信息参与行为 / 来源可信度

Key words

human-AI integration / crowdsourced fact-checking / AI fact-checking / information engagement behavior / source credibility

引用本文

导出引用
吴联仁 , 胡亚男 , 李瑾颉 , . 信任群体智慧还是AI智能?人智融合事实核查对用户信息参与行为的影响研究[J]. 知识管理论坛. 2025, 10(4): 309-320 https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.2095-5472.2025.020
Wu Lianren , Hu Yanan , Li Jinjie , et al. Trust the Crowd-wisdom or AI? Research on the Impact of Human-AI Integration Fact Checking on User Information Engagement Behavior[J]. Knowledge Management Forum. 2025, 10(4): 309-320 https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.2095-5472.2025.020
中图分类号: G206   

参考文献

[1]
张新生, 王润周, 马玉龙. AIGC背景下虚假信息治理挑战、机会与策略研究 [J/OL]. 情报科学, 1-23[2025-06-22]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/22.1264.G2.20241111.1002.024.html.
ZHANG X S, WANG L Z, MA Y L. Challenges, opportunities and strategies of misinformation governance at AIGC background[J]. Information science, 2025: 1-23.
[2]
ALLEN J, ARECHAR A A, PENNYCOOK G, et al. Scaling up fact-checking using the wisdom of crowds[J]. Science advances, 2021, 7(36): eabf4393.
[3]
RUGGERI K, STOCK F, HASLAM S A, et al. A synthesis of evidence for policy from behavioural science during COVID-19[J]. Nature, 2024, 625(7993): 134-147.
[4]
BODE L, VRAGA E K, TULLY M. Correcting misperceptions about genetically modified food on social media: examining the impact of experts, social media heuristics, and the gateway belief model[J]. Science communication, 2021, 43(2): 225-251.
[5]
HUANG G, WANG S. Is artificial intelligence more persuasive than humans? a meta-analysis[J]. Journal of communication, 2023, 73(6): 552-562.
[6]
王喆诚, 于瑞峰. 社会存在、警惕性及信息卷入度对个体事实核查的影响[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2023, 11(1): 42-49.
WANG Z C, YU R F. The impact of social presence, vigilance, and information involvement on individual fact - checking[J]. Psychological techniques and applications, 2023, 11(1): 42-49.
[7]
HANNAK A, MARGOLIN D, KEEGAN B, et al. Get back! you don’t know me like that: the social mediation of fact checking interventions in Twitter conversations[J]. Proceedings of the international AAAI conference on Web and social media, 2014, 8(1): 187-196.
[8]
PILARSKI M, SOLOVEV K O, PRÖLLOCHS N. Community notes vs. snoping: how the crowd selects fact-checking targets on social media[J]. Proceedings of the International AAAI conference on Web and social media, 2024, 18(1): 1262-1275.
[9]
LIU X, QI L, WANG L, et al. Checking the fact-checkers: the role of source type, perceived credibility, and individual differences in fact-checking effectiveness[J]. Communication research, 2023, 6(7): 00936502231206419.
[10]
CHUAI Y W, TIAN H Y, PRLLOCHS Net al. Did the roll-out of community notes reduce engagement with misinformation on X/Twitter? [J]. Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction, 2024, 428(8): 1-52.
[11]
GUO Z, SCHICHTKRULL M, VLACHOS A. A survey on automated fact-checking [J]. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2022, 10(2): 178-206.
[12]
ZHOU X, ZAFARANI R. A survey of fake news: fundamental theories, detection methods, and opportunities[J]. ACM computing surveys, 2021, 53(5): 1-40.
[13]
管佖路, 顾理平. 价值冲突与治理出路:虚假信息治理中的人工智能技术研究[J]. 新闻大学, 2022(3): 61-75, 119.
GUAN B L, GU L P. Value conflict and governance solution: examining the role of artificial intelligence in tackling misinformation[J]. Journalism research, 2022(3): 61-75, 119.
[14]
MOLINA M D, SUNDAR S S. Does distrust in humans predict greater trust in AI? role of individual differences in user responses to content moderation [J]. New media & society, 2024, 26(6): 3638-3656.
[15]
QUELLE D, BOVET A. The perils and promises of fact-checking with large language models[J]. Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2024, 7(3): 1341697.
[16]
AUGENSTEIN I, BALDWIN T, CHA M, et al. Factuality challenges in the era of large language models and opportunities for fact-checking[J]. Nature machine intelligence, 2024, 6(8): 852-863.
[17]
KUZNETSOVA E, MAKHORTYKH M, VZIATYSHEVA V, et al. In generative AI we trust: can chatbots effectively verify political information?[J]. Journal of computational social science, 2024, 8(1): 15-23.
[18]
DEVERNA M R, YAN H Y, YANG K C, et al. Fact-checking information from large language models can decrease headline discernment[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2024, 121(50): e2322823121.
[19]
SWIRE-THOMPSON B, LAZER D. Public health and online misinformation: challenges and recommendations[J]. Annual review of public health, 2020, 41(1): 433-451.
[20]
CHUNG M, KIM N. When I learn the news is false: how fact-checking information stems the spread of fake news via third-person perception[J]. Human communication research, 2021, 47(1): 1-24.
[21]
SMITH C N, SEITZ H H. Correcting misinformation about neuroscience via social media[J]. Science communication, 2019, 41(6): 790-819.
[22]
YORK C, PONDER J D, HUMPHRIES Z, et al. Effects of fact-checking political misinformation on perceptual accuracy and epistemic political efficacy[J]. Journalism & mass communication quarterly, 2020, 97(4): 958-980.
[23]
WINTERSIECK A, FRIDKIN K, KENNEY P. The message matters: the influence of fact-checking on evaluations of political messages[J]. Journal of political marketing, 2021, 20(2): 93-120.
[24]
ZHANG J, FEATHERSTONE J D, CALABRESE C, et al. Effects of fact-checking social media vaccine misinformation on attitudes toward vaccines[J]. Preventive medicine, 2021, 145(8): 106408.
[25]
CAREY J M, GUESS A M, LOEWEN P J, et al. The ephemeral effects of fact-checks on COVID-19 misperceptions in the United States, Great Britain and Canada[J]. Nature human behaviour, 2022, 6(2): 236-243.
[26]
WALTER N, BROOKS J J, SAUCIER C J, et al. Evaluating the impact of attempts to correct health misinformation on social media: a meta-analysis[J]. Health communication, 2021, 36(13): 1776-1784.
[27]
王钰昱, 夏志杰. 基于事实核查标签的众包方法应对虚假信息的效果差异及认知机制研究[J]. 知识管理论坛, 2024, 9(3): 330-340.
WANG Y Y, XIA Z J. Research on the difference in the effect of crowdsourcing methods based on fact - checking labels to deal with false information and its cognitive mechanism[J]. Knowledge management forum, 2024, 9(3): 330-340.
[28]
李瑾颉, 聂凯伦, 吴联仁, 等. 众包事实核查对信息参与行为的影响:基于来源可信度的调节 [J]. 知识管理论坛, 2024, 9(4): 367-379.
LI J J, NIE K L, WU L R, et al. The impact of crowdsourced fact-checking on user information engagement behavior: the moderating of source credibility[J]. Knowledge management forum, 2024, 9(4): 367-379.
[29]
SU Y, LEE D K L, XIAO X. “I enjoy thinking critically, and I’m in control”: examining the influences of media literacy factors on misperceptions amidst the COVID-19 infodemic[J]. Computers in human behavior, 2022, 128(9): 107111.
[30]
ARUGUETE N, BACHMANN I, CALVO E, et al. Truth be told: how “true” and “false” labels influence user engagement with fact-checks[J]. New media & society, 2023, 9(2): 14614448231193709.
[31]
PANIZZA F, RONZANI P, MORISSEAU T, et al. How do online users respond to crowdsourced fact-checking?[J]. Humanities and social sciences communications, 2023, 10(867): 1-11.
[32]
NI Z, QIAN Y, CHEN S, et al. Scientific evidence and specific context: leveraging large language models for health fact-checking[J]. Online information review, 2024, 48(7): 1488-1514.
[33]
BANAS J A, PALOMARES N A, RICHARDS A S, et al. When machine and bandwagon heuristics compete: understanding users’ response to conflicting AI and crowdsourced fact-checking[J]. Human communication research, 2022, 48(3): 430-461.
[34]
SPINA D, SANDERSON M, ANGUS D, et al. Human-AI cooperation to tackle misinformation and polarization[J]. Communications of the ACM, 2023, 66(7): 40-45.
[35]
ABBASS H A. Social integration of artificial intelligence: functions, automation allocation logic and human-autonomy trust[J]. Cognitive computation, 2019, 11(2): 159-171.
[36]
MOLINA M D, SUNDAR S S. When AI moderates online content: effects of human collaboration and interactive transparency on user trust[J]. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 2022, 27(4): zmac010.
[37]
MA H V, HUANG W W, DENNIS A R. Unintended consequences of disclosing recommendations by artificial intelligence versus humans on true and fake news believability and engagement[J]. Journal of management information systems, 2024, 41(3): 616-644.
[38]
SUSSMAN S, SIEGAL W. Informational influence in organizations: an integrated approach to knowledge adoption[J]. Information systems research, 2003, 14(3): 47-65.
[39]
NEKMAT E, GOWER K K, ZHOU S, et al. Connective-collective action on social media: moderated mediation of cognitive elaboration and perceived source credibility on personalness of source[J]. Communication research, 2019, 46(1): 62-87.
[40]
MOORE D L, HAUSKNECHT D, THAMODARAN K. Time compression, response opportunity, and persuasion[J]. Journal of consumer research, 1986, 13(1): 85-99.
[41]
叶凤云, 常琳, 秦琴, 等. 基于虚假信息特征的社交媒体大学生用户感知信任研究 [J]. 情报理论与实践, 2024, 47(10): 118-127.
YE F Y, CHANG L, QI Q, et al. Research of social media college students’ perceived trust on false information features[J]. Information studies: theory & application, 2024, 47(10): 118-127.
[42]
LUO C, LUO X R, SCHATZBERG L, et al. Impact of informational factors on online recommendation credibility: the moderating role of source credibility[J]. Decision support systems, 2013, 56(8): 92-102.
[43]
ZHANG Z, ZHANG Z, LIU S, et al. Are high-status reviewers more likely to seek anonymity? Evidence from an online review platform[J]. Journal of retailing and consumer services, 2024, 78(6): 103792.
[44]
PANG M S, PAVLOU P A. Cure or poison? Identity verification and the posting of fake news on social media[M]//Fake news on the internet. London: Taylor & Francis Group, Routledge, 2023: 119-146.
[45]
HWANG E H, LEE S. A nudge to credible information as a countermeasure to misinformation: evidence from Twitter[J]. Information systems research, 2025, 36(1): 621-636.
[46]
PENNYCOOK G, EPSTEIN Z, MOSLEH M, et al. Shifting attention to accuracy can reduce misinformation online[J]. Nature, 2021, 592(7855): 590-595.
[47]
DEVERNA M R, YAN H Y, YANG K C, et al. Fact-checking information from large language models can decrease headline discernment[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2024, 121(50): e2322823121.
[48]
XUE H, ZHANG J, SHEN C, et al. The majority of fact-checking labels in the United States are intense and this decreases engagement intention[J]. Human communication research, 2024, 50(4): 530-544.

作者贡献声明/Author contributions:

吴联仁:研究选题与框架拟定,论文理论部分撰写与修改;

胡亚男:数据收集与分析;

李瑾颉:论文实证部分撰写与修改;

齐佳音:论文修改与指导。

基金

国家自然科学基金面上项目“基于公众社交媒体卷入干预的信息疫情助推治理研究”(72274119)

PDF(1723 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/