虚拟品牌社区成员隐性知识显性化影响因素与作用路径研究

李旭光, 胡奕, 王奕霖, 孙琛, 陆颖颖

知识管理论坛 ›› 2025, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (4) : 293-308.

PDF(1848 KB)
PDF(1848 KB)
知识管理论坛 ›› 2025, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (4) : 293-308. DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.2095-5472.2025.019  CSTR: 32306.14.CN11-6036.2025.019
研究论文

虚拟品牌社区成员隐性知识显性化影响因素与作用路径研究

作者信息 +

Research on the Influencing Factors and Impact Paths of Tacit Knowledge Externalization among Virtual Brand Community Members

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

【目的/意义】 通过促进隐性知识的显性化,推动虚拟品牌社区内部的知识创新,为企业创新注入强大动力。 【方法/过程】 以小米社区成员为研究对象,对访谈数据进行编码分析与关系梳理,结合刺激—机体—反应(SOR)理论,构建虚拟品牌社区成员隐性知识显性化的影响因素及作用路径模型,最后针对个人、社区、品牌3个维度提出促进策略。 【结果/结论】 社区成员的风险感知和收益考量是影响隐性知识显性化行为的直接因素;成员的自我效能、内在驱动力,社区内的成员参与、社区内容与传播机制、社区管理与生态,以及成员对品牌的情感认同和对产品创新的持续关注则通过影响社区成员的风险感知和收益考量间接影响隐性知识显性化结果。

Abstract

[Purpose/Significance] By facilitating the externalization of tacit knowledge, this study aims to drive knowledge innovation within virtual brand communities, ultimately injecting strong momentum into corporate innovation. [Method/Process] Using Xiaomi community members as research subjects, this study conducted coding analysis and relationship mapping of interview data. Grounded in the Stimulus-Organism-Response (SOR) theory, a model was developed to identify the influencing factors and pathways of tacit knowledge externalization among virtual brand community members. Finally, promotion strategies were proposed from three dimensions: individual, community, and brand dimensions. [Result/Conclusion] Community members' risk perception and benefit considerations are direct factors influencing tacit knowledge externalization behavior. Members' self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation, along with community-level factors (including member participation, content dissemination mechanisms, management, and ecosystem), as well as members' emotional identification with the brand and continuous attention to product innovation, indirectly affect tacit knowledge externalization by influencing members' risk perception and benefit considerations.

关键词

虚拟品牌社区 / 隐性知识显性化 / 扎根理论 / 知识创新 / 影响因素

Key words

virtual brand community / tacit knowledge externalization / grounded theory / knowledge innovation / influencing factor

引用本文

导出引用
李旭光 , 胡奕 , 王奕霖 , . 虚拟品牌社区成员隐性知识显性化影响因素与作用路径研究[J]. 知识管理论坛. 2025, 10(4): 293-308 https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.2095-5472.2025.019
Li Xuguang , Hu Yi , Wang Yilin , et al. Research on the Influencing Factors and Impact Paths of Tacit Knowledge Externalization among Virtual Brand Community Members[J]. Knowledge Management Forum. 2025, 10(4): 293-308 https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.2095-5472.2025.019
中图分类号: F713   

参考文献

[1]
新华社. 李强在政府工作报告中提出,大力推进现代化产业体系建设,加快发展新质生产力[EB/OL]. [2025-06-11]. https://www.gov.cn/yaowen/liebiao/202403/content_6936331.htm.
[2]
WANG K, TAI J C F, HU H. Role of brand engagement and co-creation experience in online brand community continuance: a service-dominant logic perspective[J]. Information processing & management, 2023, 60(1): 103136.
[3]
CHEN A, LU Y, GONG Y. Higher price: a benefit of online value co-creation activities in sponsored communities[J]. Information & management, 2022, 59(8): 103703.
[4]
陶晨晨.消费者契合、价值共创与跨境电商企业创新绩效[J]. 商业经济研究, 2024(17): 163-166.
TAO C C. Consumer fit, value co-creation, and innovation performance of cross-border e-commerce enterprises[J]. Journal of commercial economics, 2024(17): 163-166.
[5]
汪寿阳, 敖敬宁, 乔晗, 等.基于知识管理的商业模式冰山理论[J]. 管理评论, 2015, 27(6): 3-10.
WANG S Y, AO J N, QIAO H, et al. Iceberg theory: a new methodology for studying business model from knowledge management perspective[J]. Management review, 2015, 27(6): 3-10.
[6]
SIAL M A, PAUL Z I, RAFIQ Z, et al. Does mobile technology shape employee socialization and enable tacit knowledge sharing in public sector organizations[J]. Journal of open innovation: technology, market, and complexity, 2023, 9(3): 100089.
[7]
李旭光, 朱学坤, 王奕霖, 等.虚拟品牌社区意见领袖在知识协同创新中的作用研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2022, 45(12): 146-155.
LI X G, ZHU X K, WANG Y L, et al. A study on the effects of opinion leaders of virtual brand community in knowledge collaborative innovation[J]. Information studies: theory & application, 2022, 45(12): 146-155.
[8]
NONAKA I, TAKEUCHI H, UMEMOTO K. A theory of organizational knowledge creation [J]. International journal of technology management, 1996, 11(7-8): 833-845.
[9]
李贺, 彭丽徽, 洪闯, 等. 内外生视角下虚拟社区用户知识创新行为激励因素研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2019, 63(8): 45-56.
LI H, PENG L H, HONG C, et al. Research on motivation factors of user knowledge innovation behavior in virtual community based on endogenous and exogenous perspectives [J]. Library and information service, 2019, 63 (8): 45-56
[10]
POLANYI M. Personal knowledge[M]. Chicago: the University of Chicago Press, 1958.
[11]
NONAKA I, TAKEUCHI H. The knowledge creating company[J]. Harvard business review, 2007, 85(7/8): 162.
[12]
LUBIT R. The keys to sustainable competitive advantage: tacit knowledge and knowledge management [J]. Organizational dynamics, 2010, 29(3): 164-178.
[13]
EL-DEN J, SRIRATANAVIRIYAKUL N. The role of opinions and ideas as types of tacit knowledge[J]. Procedia computer science, 2019, 161:23-31.
[14]
周楚轶, 陶冶, 李游.基于文化知识解构与重构的传统手工技艺文化产品设计研究[J]. 包装工程, 2023, 44(16): 237-245.
ZHOU C Y, TAO Y, LI Y. Research on the design of traditional handicraft cultural products based on the deconstruction and reconstruction of cultural knowledge[J]. Packaging engineering, 2023, 44(16): 237-245.
[15]
NONAKA I, KONNO N. The concept of “Ba”: building a foundation for knowledge creation[J]. California management review, 1998, 40(3): 40-54.
[16]
申传斌.基于知识管理的隐性知识显性化研究[J]. 科技管理研究, 2005, 25(11): 232-235.
SHEN C B. Research on the externalization of tacit knowledge based on knowledge management [J]. Science and technology management research, 2005, 25(11): 232-235.
[17]
张敏, 马臻, 张艳.在线健康社区用户隐性知识显性化行为的扎根分析[J]. 图书馆学研究, 2019(1): 53-61, 93.
ZHANG M, MA Z, ZHANG Y. A grounded analysis of users' tacit knowledge explicit behaviors in online health community[J]. Research on library science, 2019(1): 53-61, 93.
[18]
CHI C, ZHANG Z, LI C, et al. Research on the factors of the process of the tacit knowledge in knowledge service enterprises[j]. The open cybernetics & systemics journal, 2015, 9(1): 1776-1782.
[19]
HUNG S Y, TSAI J C A, CHEN K, et al. Tacit knowledge sharing in information systems development projects: social interdependence and regulatory focus perspectives[J]. Information technology & people, 2023, 37(4): 1449-1477.
[20]
KUCHARSKA W. Tacit knowledge influence on intellectual capital and innovativeness in the healthcare sector: a cross-country study of Poland and the US[J]. Journal of business research, 2022, 149(2): 869-883.
[21]
KARNANI F. The university’s unknown knowledge: tacit knowledge, technology transfer and university spin-offs findings from an empirical study based on the theory of knowledge[J]. The journal of technology transfer, 2013, 38(3): 235-250.
[22]
黄智慧, 王凤姣.图书馆知识转移生态化的机理及改进研究[J]. 图书馆学研究, 2021(22): 9-15.
HUANG Z H, WANG F J. A study on the mechanism and improvement of the ecologization of knowledge transfer in library[J]. Research on library science, 2021(22): 9-15.
[23]
库卡茨.质性文本分析:方法, 实践与软件使用指南[M]. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2017.
KUKATZ W. Qualitative text analysis: methods, practices, and software user guide [M]. Chongqing: Chongqing University Press, 2017.
[24]
GLASER B G, STRAUSS A L, STRUTZEL E. The discovery of grounded theory; strategies for qualitative research[J]. Nursing research, 1968, 17(4): 364.
[25]
KAMBOJ S, SARMAH B, GUPTA S, et al. Examining branding co-creation in brand communities on social media: applying the paradigm of Stimulus-Organism-Response[J]. International journal of information management, 2018, 39(5): 169-185.
[26]
KIM H, YOO J, PARK M. Metaverse friends with social benefits: effects of social identity on the intention to purchase virtual products through site attachment, user engagement, and public self-consciousness[J]. Journal of retailing and consumer services, 2025, 83(1): 104158.
[27]
王楠, 王莉雅, 李瑶, 等.同侪影响对用户贡献行为的作用研究——基于网络客观大数据的分析[J]. 科学学研究, 2021, 39(12): 2294-2304.
WANG N, WANG L Y, LI Y, et al. Research on the role of peer influence on user contribution behavior: an analysis based on objective big data in the network [J]. Scientific research, 2021, 39 (12): 2294-2304
[28]
连婷婷, 袁曦临.基于互动仪式链理论的虚拟阅读社区研究——以豆瓣读书会小组为例[J]. 图书馆工作与研究, 2023(8): 59-64, 89.
LIAN T T, YUAN X L. A study on virtual reading communities based on interaction ritual chain theory: taking the Douban reading group as an example [J]. Library work and study, 2023(8): 59-64, 89.
[29]
SIMONETTI A, BIGNE E, NAVAS L F R. Consumer brand choice in the metaverse: exploring personal and social factors[J]. Technological forecasting and social change, 2025, 213(4): 124033.
[30]
王鹏民, 罗公利.主观博弈视角下虚拟学术社区用户知识交互行为分析[J]. 现代情报, 2022, 42(8): 61-73.
WANG P M, LUO G L. Analysis of user knowledge interaction behavior in virtual academic communities from a subjective game perspective [J]. Journal of modern information, 2022, 42(8): 61-73.
[31]
KAUR H, PARUTHI M, ISLAM J, et al. The role of brand community identification and reward on consumer brand engagement and brand loyalty in virtual brand communities[J]. Telematics and informatics, 2020, 46: 101321.
[32]
王爽.基于虚拟品牌社群的顾客忠诚度研究[D]. 石家庄: 河北科技大学, 2022.
WANG S. Research on customer loyalty based on virtual brand communities [D]. Shijiazhuang: Hebei University of Science and Technology, 2022
[33]
谢笑莲.元宇宙赋能下学术虚拟社区知识共享行为及其驱动因素[J]. 图书馆工作与研究, 2023(10): 3-12, 22.
XIE X L. Knowledge sharing behavior and driving factors in academic virtual communities empowered by the metaverse [J]. Library work and study, 2023 (10): 3-12, 22
[34]
丁照军, 王富强, 张玲玲.挑战性—阻碍性压力源对隐性知识共享意愿影响的实证研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2023, 67(19): 92-110.
DING Z J, WANG F Q, ZHANG L L. An empirical study on the effect of challenging-hindering stressors on tacit knowledge sharing willingness[J]. Library and information service, 2023, 67(19): 92-110.
[35]
胡刃锋, 刘国亮.移动互联网环境下产学研协同创新隐性知识共享影响因素实证研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015, 59(7): 48-54, 90.
HU R F, LIU G L. An empirical research of industry-university collaborative innovation tacit knowledge sharing factors in mobile internet environment[J]. Library and information service, 2015, 59(7): 48-54, 90.
[36]
ŠKERLAVAJ M, CONNELLY C E, CERNE M, et al. Tell me if you can: time pressure, prosocial motivation, perspective taking, and knowledge hiding[J]. Journal of knowledge management, 2018, 22(7): 1489-1509.
[37]
ROMERO P M, LIM R E, PARK H. Branded virtual worlds in fashion gaming: examining the role of brand narratives and social presence in consumer engagement[J]. Computers in human behavior, 2025, 164(5): 108505.

作者贡献声明/Author contributions:

李旭光:提出研究问题,指导研究工作实施;

胡奕:整理论文思路,撰写与修改论文;

王奕霖:整理论文思路,撰写与修改论文;

孙琛:整理论文思路,修改论文;

陆颖颖:整理论文思路,提供修改方向。

基金

山东省泰山学者工程专项“依托社交网站的消费者虚拟社区创新性知识转移研究”(tsqn202306193)
国家自然科学基金面上项目“共享平台供给者数字韧性的形成与作用机制研究:基于复杂适应系统视角”(72272138)

PDF(1848 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/