
国内外开放科学成本测算研究进展与展望
A review of the research progress and prospects of open science cost estimation at home and abroad
[目的/意义] 明晰开放科学这一科研活动所涉及的成本投入,为后期效益评价做铺垫。[方法/过程] 对国内外开放科学成本测算研究进行系统梳理,将其总结为基于开放科研体系的科研资助机构、科研人员和科研项目三个方面,并从测算对象、测算方法、量化收益、监控评估4个方面进行系统分析。[结果/结论] 国内外开放科学成本测算研究取得较为丰硕的成果,目前学者更加关注全面评估开放获取/科学对传统科研经费的影响、经济成本以及知识扩散、学科发展的问题,但也存在一些不足之处。未来研究可以关注开放科学成本测算的方法创新、政策实施影响的深入分析以及开放科学在不同学科领域中实践的比较研究等方面。
[Purpose/Significance] In recent years, the concept of open science has been widely recognized and highly valued by governments. Many foreign universities and research institutions have incorporated open science into their scientific research management systems, and have carried out a large number of open scientific research work, which has achieved significant economic benefits. [Method/Process] This paper systematically reviews the cost estimation research of open science at home and abroad, and summarizes that the cost estimation research of open science mainly includes three aspects: scientific research funding institutions, scientific researchers and scientific research projects based on the open scientific research system, and systematically analyzes the measurement objects, calculation methods, quantitative benefits, monitoring and evaluation, etc. [Result/Conclusion] At present, scholars pay more attention to comprehensively evaluating the impact of open access/science on traditional scientific research funding, economic cost, knowledge diffusion, and discipline development, but there are also some shortcomings. In the future, research on the innovation of open science cost estimation, in-depth analysis of the impact of policy implementation, and comparative research on the practice of open science in different disciplines can be carried out.
open science / the cost of open science / open science cost pricing assessment
[1] |
UNESCO. Open science outlook 1:status and trends around the world[EB/OL].[2024-04-17].https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000387324.
|
[2] |
中华人民共和国中央人民政府. 中华人民共和国科学技术进步法[EB/OL]. [2024-04-18]. https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2021-12/25/content_5664471.htm. (People's Republic of China Central People's Government. People's Republic of China Science and Technology Progress Act[EB/OL]. [2024-10-18]. https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2021-12/25/content_5664471.htm.)
|
[3] |
中华人民共和国中央人民政府. 习近平:高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜 为全面建设社会主义现代化国家而团结奋斗——在中国共产党第二十次全国代表大会上的报告[EB/OL]. [2024-04-18]. https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2022-10/25/content_5721685.htm.(The Central People's Government of the People's Republic of China. Xi Jinping: Hold high the great banner of Socialism with Chinese Characteristics and strive in unity to build a modern socialist country in all respects — Report delivered at the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China [EB/OL]. [2024-04-18]. https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2022-10/25/content_5721685.htm.)
|
[4] |
中华人民共和国国家和发展改革委员会. 国家数据局成立恰逢其时意义深远[EB/OL]. [2024-07-13]. https://www.baidu.com/link?url=VbwopPI3GQW5H20CALz5fcA9r469kIBZglylSuKY1ou5OHJ-Ke3H5I7zB4hb5VFhQo3vp66xYnqoaeKMhNFtPqvzNGiNVsiQpYqljhxZxf7&wd=&eqid=f5d32a12001cea3f000000066711d5dd.(National Development and Reform Commission of the People's Republic of China. The establishment of the National Data Bureau is timely and of far-reaching significance [EB/OL]. [2024-07-13]. https://www.baidu.com/link?url=VbwopPI3GQW5H20CALz5fcA9r469kIBZglylSuKY1ou5OHJ-Ke3H5I7zB4hb5VFhQo3vp66xYnqoaeKMhNFtPqvzNGiNVsiQpYqljhxZxf7&wd=&eqid=f5d32a12001cea3f000000066711d5dd.)
|
[5] |
HORNGREN C T. Cost accounting: a managerial emphasis[M]. Pearson Education India, 2009.
|
[6] |
MISLICK G K, NUSSBAUM D A. Cost estimation: methods and tools[M]. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2015.
|
[7] |
REICH B H, WEE S Y. Searching for knowledge in the PMBOK® guide[J]. Project management journal, 2006, 37(2): 11-26.
|
[8] |
SMITH P V. The international cost engineering council and the global demand for cost engineers[J]. AACE international transactions, 2008,50(7) .
|
[9] |
UNESCO. UNESCO open science outlook1: status and trends around the world[EB/OL]. [2024-04-18]. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000387324.locale=en.
|
[10] |
ŠPACIROVA Z, EPSTEIN D, GARCIA-MOCHON L, et al. A general framework for classifying costing methods for economic evaluation of health care[J]. The European journal of health economics, 2020, 21(4): 529-542.
|
[11] |
WORLD BANK GROUP. Chapter 3 | Guidance notes on evaluation approaches and methods in development[EB/OL]. [2024-07-15]. https://ieg.worldbankgroup.org/evaluation-international-development/chapter-3-guidance-notes-evaluation-approaches-and-methods.
|
[12] |
GOLD E R. Accelerating translational research through open science: the neuro experiment[J]. PLoS biology, 2016, 14(12): e2001259.
|
[13] |
OKASHA S, MARTENS J. The causal meaning of Hamilton's rule[J]. Royal society open science, 2016, 3(3): 160037.
|
[14] |
Evaluation of research careers fully acknowledging open science practices - rewards, incentives and/or recognition for researchers practicing open science.[R/OL]. [2024-07-15].https://orbi.uliege.be/handle/2268/215460.
|
[15] |
GAGLIARDI D, COX D, LI Y. Institutional inertia and barriers to the adoption of open science[M]//The transformation of university institutional and organizational boundaries. Netherlands: BRILL,2015:107-133.
|
[16] |
张旭,杨朝峰.基于双边市场模型的开放获取期刊与传统期刊竞争分析[J].图书情报工作,2011,55(20):144-148.(ZHANG X, YANG C F. On the competition of open access and traditional journals based on two-sided markets model[J].Library and information service,2011,55(20):144-148.)
|
[17] |
王丽培,蒋永福.开放获取视域下主体权益博弈困境及其破解研究——以学术期刊为例[J].图书馆研究,2019,49(5):1-10.(WANG L P, JIANG Y F. The difficulties and solutions of the game of subject righrs and interests from the perspective of open access: taking academic journals as an example[J].Library Research,2019,49(5):1-10.)
|
[18] |
王咏梅,张文德.开放获取期刊出版的经济机制构建[J].情报理论与实践,2010,33(5):43-46.(WANG Y M, ZHANG W D. Construction of the economic mechanism of open access journal publication[J].Information Studies:Theory & Application,2010,33(5):43-46.)
|
[19] |
PARTH D, DAVID P A. Toward a new economics of science[J]. Research policy, 1994, 23(5): 487-521.
|
[20] |
VAN NOORDEN R. The true cost of science publishing[J]. Nature, 2013, 495(7442): 426-429.
|
[21] |
潘旸,王嬛,孙平,等.Elsevier医学专业开放获取期刊影响因子与论文处理费的相关性调研与分析[J].中国科技期刊研究,2024,35(1):104-109. (PAN Y, WANG H, SUN P, et al. Correlations between impact factors and article processing charges of elsevier's open access medical journals[J].Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals,2024,35(1):104-109.)
|
[22] |
郁林羲,姚思卉,邢爱敏,等.开放获取论文收取论文处理费情况调查与分析[J].科技与出版,2021,(9):41-45.(YU L X, YAO S H, XING A M, et al. Investigation and analysis of the paper processing fee charged for open access papers[J].Science-technology & publication,2021,(9):41-45.)
|
[23] |
柴玥,杨中楷.中国科技期刊开放获取实现路径探析——基于成本收益视角[J].中国科技期刊研究,2014,25(11):1340-1344.(CHAI Y, YANG Z K. Research on Chinese science and technology periodicals[J].Chinese journal of scientific and technical periodicals,2014,25(11):1340-1344.)
|
[24] |
张轶华,郭晶,申雅琪,等.我国WOS论文开放获取出版与图书馆订阅经费转换的经济成本测算研究[J].大学图书馆学报,2022,40(2):67-75.(ZHANG Y H, GUO J, SHEN Y Q, et al. Estimating the publishing fees of china’s open access papers in wos and the economic costs of transformation from libraries’ subscription expenditure.[J].Journal of academic libraries,2022,40(2):67-75.)
|
[25] |
郑建程,赵艳,肖曼,等.学术期刊从订阅模式向开放获取模式转化的经费可行性研究:OA2020的启示[J].图书情报工作,2016,60(12):75-80.(ZHENG J C, ZHAO Y, XIAO M, et al. Research on the feasibility of funding when transforming academic journals from the subscription-based model to the open access publishing model: Inspiration of OA2020[J].Library and information service,2016,60(12):75-80.)
|
[26] |
周琴,李军莲,任慧玲.加州大学电子期刊订购向开放获取转换的策略研究[J].数字图书馆论坛,2021,(11):37-41.(ZHOU Q,LI J L,REN H L. Research on the strategies of transformation from electronic journal subscription to open access in the university of California[J].Digital library forum,2021,(11):37-41.)
|
[27] |
TOAN H M. Cost of science: an early career researcher’s perspective[R]. Hanoi: Center for Open Science, 2021.
|
[28] |
ALI-KHAN S E, HARRIS L W, GOLD E R. Motivating participation in open science by examining researcher incentives[J]. Elife, 2017, 6: e29319.
|
[29] |
PARTHA D, DAVID P A. Toward a new economics of science[J]. Research policy, 1994, 23(5): 487-521.
|
[30] |
GRANTHAM G. Science and its transactions cost: The emergence of institutionalized science[R]. Quebec: McGill University, Department of Economics.,2009.
|
[31] |
PAMPEL H, DALLMEIER-TIESSEN S. Open research data: From vision to practice[J]. Opening science: The evolving guide on how the Internet is changing research, collaboration and scholarly publishing, 2014: 213-224.
|
[32] |
朱江,尚玮姣,韩红.中国科学院学术会议文献开放出版研究[J].图书馆学研究,2011,(15):69-73.(ZHU J, SHANG W J, HAN H. Research on the open publication of academic conference documents of the Chinese academy of sciences[J].Research on library science,2011,(15):69-73.)
|
[33] |
邓君,邢宝山.成本机构知识库建设的技术因素研究[J].情报科学,2010,28(7):1094-1099.(DENG J, XING B S. Research on the technology and cost factors on the construct of institutional repositories[J].Information science,2010,28(7):1094-1099.)
|
[34] |
KIDWELL M C, LAZAREVIC L B, BARANSKI E, et al. Badges to acknowledge open practices: a simple, low-cost, effective method for increasing transparency[J]. PLoS biology,2016,14(5): e1002456.
|
[35] |
MONS B. Data stewardship for open science: implementing FAIR principles[M]. New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2018.
|
[36] |
CARILLO M R, PAPAGNI E. “Little Science” and “Big Science”: the institution of “Open Science” as a cause of scientific and economic inequalities among countries[J]. Economic modelling, 2014, 43: 42-56.
|
[37] |
GOLD E R. The fall of the innovation empire and its possible rise through open science[J]. Research policy, 2021, 50(5): 104226.
|
[38] |
MUKHERJEE A, STERN S. Disclosure or secrecy? the dynamics of open science[J]. International journal of industrial organization, 2009, 27(3): 449-462.
|
[39] |
DAVID P A. Can" open science" be protected from the evolving regime of IPR protections?[J]. Journal of institutional and theoretical economics, 2004: 9-34.
|
[40] |
HEISE C, PEARCE J M. From open access to open science: the path from scientific reality to open scientific communication[J]. SAGE open, 2020, 10(2): 2158244020915900.
|
[41] |
BREMBS B, HUNEMAN P, SCHONBRODT F, et al. Replacing academic journals[J]. Royal society open science, 2023, 10(7): 230206.
|
[42] |
JOLY Y, DALPE G, SO D, et al. Fair shares and sharing fairly: a survey of public views on open science, informed consent and participatory research in biobanking[J]. PloS one, 2015, 10(7): e0129893.
|
[43] |
STIEGLITZ S, WILMS K, MIRBABAIE M, et al. When are researchers willing to share their data?–Impacts of values and uncertainty on open data in academia[J]. PLoS one, 2020, 15(7): e0234172.
|
[44] |
Esanu J M, Uhlir P F, National Research Council. The economic logic of “open science” and the balance between private property rights and the public domain in scientific data and information: a primer[C]//The role of scientific and technical data and information in the public domain: proceedings of a symposium. Washington (DC): National Academies Press, 2003.
|
[45] |
SIMETH M, RAFFO J D. What makes companies pursue an open science strategy?[J]. Research policy, 2013, 42(9): 1531-1543.
|
[46] |
刘锦宏,黄梦圆,刘淼淼.我国高校学生开放获取学术资源使用意愿研究[J].出版科学,2023,31(2):78-88.(LIU J H,HUANG M Y, LIU M M. A study on the willingness of Chinese college students to use open access academic resources[J].Publishing journal,2023,31(2):78-88.)
|
[47] |
ZHANG L, WEI Y, HUANG Y, et al. Should open access lead to closed research? The trends towards paying to perform research[J]. Scientometrics, 2022, 127(12): 7653-7679.
|
[48] |
徐益波,郝彧,亢琦.开放获取的可持续发展:经济、社会和环境集成研究视角[J].高校图书馆工作,2019,39(6):13-15,37.(XU Y B, HAO Y, KANG Q. Sustainability of open access: integrated research perspectives of economy, society and environment[J].Library work in colleges and universities,2019,39(6):13-15,37.)
|
[49] |
ROUSIA M, LAAKSO M. Overlay journals: A study of the current landscape[J]. Journal of librarianship and information science, 2024, 56(1): 15-28.
|
[50] |
LAMPERT D, LINDORFER M, PREM E, et al. New indicators for open science-Possible ways of measuring the uptake and impact of open science[J].The fteval journal for research and technology policy evaluation, 2017, 44: 50-56.
|
[51] |
陈传夫.开放科学的价值观与制度逻辑[J].武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2023,76(6):173-184.(CHEN C F. Values and institutional logic of open science.[J] Wuhan University journal(philosophy & social science),2023,76(6):173-184.)
|
[52] |
LEE P. Contracting to preserve Open Science: Consideration-Based Regulation in Patent Law[J]. Emory LJ, 2008, 58: 889.
|
[53] |
NG W. Cost hurdles to open access publishing: a citizen scientist perspective[J]. PeerJ preprints, 2017, 4: e2463v2.
|
[54] |
GOLD E R. The fall of the innovation empire and its possible rise through open science[J]. Research policy, 2021, 50(5): 104226.
|
[55] |
EBERGSBERGER B, BLOCH C, HERSTAD S J, et al. Open innovation practices and their effect on innovation performance[J]. International journal of innovation and technology management, 2012, 9(6): 1250040.
|
[56] |
VELETSIANOS G. A definition of emerging technologies for education[J]. Emerging technologies in distance education, 2010, 56(3): 3-22.
|
[57] |
MCKIERNAN E C, BOURNE P E, BROWN C T, et al. How open science helps researchers succeed[J]. elife, 2016, 5: e16800.
|
[58] |
WICAL S H, KOCKEN G J. Open access and promotion and tenure evaluation plans at the University of Wisconsin–Eau Claire[J]. Serials review, 2017, 43(2): 111-119.
|
[59] |
LEBEL E P, CAMPBELL L, LOVING T J. Benefits of open and high-powered research outweigh costs[J]. Journal of personality and social psychology, 2017, 113(2): 230.
|
[60] |
VICENTE-SAEZ R, MARTINEZ-FUENTES C. Open science now: a systematic literature review for an integrated definition[J]. Journal of business research, 2018, 88: 428-436.
|
[61] |
VETTERLI M, D’AMOURS S, BRONSTEIN M, et al. Publication of the assessment report of the CNRS[EB/OL].[2024-07-15].https://www.hceres.fr/en/press-release/publication-assessment-report-cnrs.
|
[62] |
FORSSTROM P L, LILJA E, ALA-MANTILA M. Atlas of open science and research in Finland 2019: Evaluation of openness in the activities of higher education institutions, research institutes, research-funding organizations, finish academic and cultural institutes abroad and learned societies and academies. Final report[M]. Helsinki: Ministry of education and culture, 2020.
|
[63] |
Open Science Collaboration. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science[J]. Science, 2015, 349(6251): aac4716.
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |