
用户体验视角下政务微信公众号信息效用评价研究——基于QFD与VIKOR的方法应用
冯缨, 方正伟, 孙晓阳
知识管理论坛 ›› 2024, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (3) : 269-284.
用户体验视角下政务微信公众号信息效用评价研究——基于QFD与VIKOR的方法应用
An Evaluation of Government WeChat Public Account Information Utility from the Perspective of User Experience—Method application based on QFD and VIKOR
[目的/意义] 明确政务微信公众号信息效用的内涵,构建政务微信公众号信息效用评价指标体系,对满足社会公众的信息服务需求和政务微信平台的建设运营至关重要。[方法/过程] 基于用户体验理论确定评价指标,根据质量功能展开(QFD)思想确定指标权重;以江苏省13个地级市的“发布类”政务微信公众号为研究对象,运用多准则妥协解排序(VIKOR)和灰色关联度方法进行全评价排序。[结果/结论] 政务微信公众号信息效用的评价指标包括信息内容体验、信息技术体验、美学设计体验、交互体验、效益价值、社会影响6个维度共21个指标,其中信息技术、交互体验维度的权重占比最大,对信息效用起决定性作用,平均阅读量、平均点赞量、粉丝活跃数等指标对评价信息效用最重要;实证研究中,“南京发布”“苏州发布”“无锡发布”公众号的信息效用排名前三,“盐城发布”“镇江发布”公众号整体排名靠后,主要原因在于各平台在成本投入和运营维护等方面存在差异。
[Purpose/Significance] Clarifying the connotation of the information utility of the government WeChat public account and constructing the evaluation index system of the information utility of the government WeChat public account are crucial to meeting the information service needs of the public and the construction and operation of the government WeChat platform. [Method/Process] The evaluation indexes were determined based on user experience theory, and the index weight was determined based on the concept of Quality Function Deployment (QFD). The governmental WeChat public accounts of 13 prefecture-level cities in Jiangsu Province were taken as the research objects, and the VIKOR and grey relational degree methods were used to conduct the full evaluation ranking. [Result/Conclusion] The evaluation index of the government WeChat public account information utility include 21 indexes in six dimensions, namely, information content experience, information technology experience, aesthetic design experience, interactive experience, benefit value, and social impact. Among them, the information technology and interactive experience dimensions account for the largest proportion and play decisive roles in the information utility. The average reading, average liking, and number of active fans are the most important indices for evaluating the information utility. In the empirical study, the official accounts of "Nanjing Publishing", "Suzhou Publishing" and "Wuxi Publishing" rank in the top three in terms of information utility, while the official accounts of "Yancheng Publishing" and "Zhenjiang Publishing" rank at the bottom overall, mainly because the differences in cost input, operation and maintenance of each platform.
用户体验 / Fuzzy-QFD / 政务微信公众号 / 信息效用 / 评价体系
user experience / fuzzy QFD / government WeChat public account / information utility / evaluation system
[1] |
中国互联网络信息中心. 第53次中国互联网络发展状况统计报告[R]. 北京: 中国互联网络信息中心, 2024. (CHINA INTERNET NETWORK INFORMATION CENTER. 53rd statistical report on the development of internet in China [R] Beijing: China Internet Network Information Center, 2023.)
|
[2] |
霍明奎, 蒋春芳. 基于信息生态理论的政务微信平台用户互动意愿影响因素及提升策略研究[J]. 电子政务, 2020(3): 110-120. (HUO M K, JIANG C F. Research on the influencing factors and improvement strategies of user interaction willingness on government WeChat platforms based on information ecology theory [J]. E-Government, 2020(3): 110-120.)
|
[3] |
陈建龙. 论信息效用及其实现过程[J]. 北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 1996(3): 36-40. (CHEN J L. On information utility and its imp lementation process[J]. Journal of Peking University (Philosophy and social sciences), 1996(3): 36-40.)
|
[4] |
PARASURAMAN A, ZEITHAML V A, BERRY L L. A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research[J]. Journal of marketing,1985, 49(4): 41-50.
|
[5] |
朱益平, 杜海娇, 张佳, 等. 基于RS-BP神经网络的政务微信公众号信息质量评价模型研究[J]. 情报科学, 2021, 39(2):54-61,69. (ZHU Y P, DU H J, ZHANG J, et al. Information quality evaluation model research of government WeChat public account based on RS-BP neural networks [J]. Information science, 2021, 39(2): 54-61,69.)
|
[6] |
闫奕文, 张海涛, 孙思阳, 等. 基于BP神经网络的政务微信公众号信息传播效果评价研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2017, 61(20): 53-62. (YAN Y W, ZHANG H T, SUN S Y, et al. Research on the effect evaluation of the government WeChat information communication based on the BP neural network [J]. Library and information service, 2017, 61(20): 53-62.)
|
[7] |
张晓娟, 刘亚茹, 邓福成. 基于用户满意度的政务微信服务质量评价模型及其实证研究[J]. 图书与情报, 2017(2): 41-47,83. (ZHANG X J, LIU Y R, DENG F C. Evaluation model of government WeChat based on satisfaction and its empirical research [J]. Library & information, 2017(2): 41-47,83.)
|
[8] |
李宗富, 张向先. 政务微信公众号服务质量评价指标体系构建及实证研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2016, 60(18): 79-88. (LI Z F, ZHANG X X. Construction of evaluation index system and empirical research on the service quality of government WeChat official accounts [J]. Library and information service, 2016, 60(18): 79-88.)
|
[9] |
宋雪雁, 管丹丹, 张祥青, 等. 用户满意视角下政务微信知识服务能力评价研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2019, 42(3): 120-126. (SONG X Y, GUAN D D, ZHANG X Q, et al. Evaluation of government WeChat knowledge service capability from the perspective of user satisfaction [J]. Information studies: theory & application, 2019, 42(3): 120-126.)
|
[10] |
曹政, 王宁, 杨学成. 基于层次分析法和模糊综合评判的政务微信影响力评估研究[J]. 电子政务, 2016(7): 42-49. (CAO Z, WANG N, YANG X C. Research on the evaluation of government WeChat influence based on analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation [J]. E-Government, 2016(7): 42-49.)
|
[11] |
MANSOOR M. Citizens' trust in government as a function of good governance and government agency's provision of quality information on social media during COVID-19[J]. Government information quarterly, 2021, 38(4): 101597.
|
[12] |
STONE J A, FLANDERS K J, CAN S H. Strategic communication? measurement and evaluation of Twitter use among municipal governments[J]. Government information quarterly, 2022, 39(4): 101755.
|
[13] |
WUKICH C. Social media engagement forms in government: A structure-content framework[J]. Government information quarterly, 2022, 39(2): 101684.
|
[14] |
戴昌钧, 刘广. 信息效用及其在决策行为中的应用[C]//中国信息经济学会2007年学术年会论文集. 哈尔滨:《管理科学》编辑部, 2007: 3. (DAI C J, LIU G. Information utility and its application in decision-making behavior [C]//Proceedings of the 2007 academic annual conference of the China Society of Information Economy. Harbin: Management Science Editorial Department, 2007:3.)
|
[15] |
吴仲夏. 信息效用测度方法新探[J]. 情报杂志, 1996(6):7-9. (WU Z X. A new exploration of information utility measurement methods [J]. Journal of intelligence, 1996(6): 7-9.)
|
[16] |
张登兵, 陈彦. 信息的广义内涵及其效用研究[J]. 沿海企业与科技, 2008(11): 22-24. (ZHANG D B, CHEN Y. Research on the generalized connotation and utility of information [J]. Coastal enterprises and science & technology, 2008(11): 22-24.)
|
[17] |
李霞, 戴昌钧. 信息商品效用的模糊综合评价研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2009, 32(12): 71-72,83. (LI X, DAI C J. Research on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of the utility of information goods [J]. Information studies: theory & application, 2009, 32(12): 71-72,83.)
|
[18] |
冯缨, 唐慧, 孙晓阳. 基于DEMATEL的企业社交媒体信息效用的关键影响因素研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2022, 45(4): 137-145,153. (FENG Y, TANG H, SUN X Y. Research on key factors of the information utility of corporate social media based on DEMATEL [J]. Information studies: theory & application, 2022, 45(4): 137-145,153.)
|
[19] |
王锦, 韩毅. 用户体验视角下心理健康科普短视频的信息效用及其影响因素研究——基于B站大学生用户的扎根探索[J]. 情报科学, 2023, 41(3): 74-80,118. (WANG J, HAN Y. Information utility and its influencing factors to mental health science popularization short video under the context of user experience—a grounded research for college students based on Bilibili [J]. Information science, 2023, 41(3): 74-80,118.)
|
[20] |
冯缨, 强蓉, 孙晓阳. 高质量发展背景下地方政务社交媒体信息效用提升策略研究[J]. 经营与管理, 2023(8): 155-161. (FENG Y, QIANG R, SUN X Y. Research on strategies for improving the information utility of local government social media in the context of high quality development [J]. Management and administration, 2023(8): 155-161.)
|
[21] |
李永锋, 侍伟伟, 朱丽萍. 基于灰色层次分析法的老年人APP用户体验评价研究[J]. 图学学报, 2018, 39(1): 68-74. (LI Y F, SHI W W, ZHU L P. Research on the user experience evaluation of APP for the elder based on grey AHP [J]. Journal of graphics, 2018, 39(1): 68-74.)
|
[22] |
陈娟, 邓胜利. 社会化问答平台用户体验影响因素实证分析——以知乎为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015, 59(24): 102-108. (CHEN J, DENG S L. An empirical analysis on factors affecting user experience of social Q&A websites: a case study on Zhihu website [J]. Library and information service, 2015, 59(24): 102-108.)
|
[23] |
HASSENZAHL M, TRACTINSKY N. User experience - A research agenda[J]. Behaviour and information technology, 2006, 25(2): 91-97.
|
[24] |
LAW E L C, VAN SCHAIK P. Modelling user experience-an agenda for research and practice[J]. Interacting with computers, 2010, 22 (5): 313-322.
|
[25] |
侯筱蓉, 付扬, 陈娟. 基于微信平台的健康信息用户感知和效用研究[J]. 现代情报, 2016, 36(10): 89-93. (HOU X R, FU Y, CHEN J. The research of user perception and utility of health information based on WeChat platform [J]. Journal of modern information, 2016, 36(10): 89-93.)
|
[26] |
史丛. 关于信息资源效用的分析[J]. 情报杂志, 2009, 28(S1): 281-282,228. (SHI C. Analysis of the utility of information resources [J]. Journal of intelligence, 2009, 28(S1): 281-282,228.)
|
[27] |
魏群义, 李艺亭, 姚媛. 移动图书馆用户体验评价指标体系研究——以重庆大学微信图书馆平台为例[J]. 国家图书馆学刊, 2018, 27(5): 21-31. (WEI Q Y, LI Y T, YAO Y. Research on evaluation index system of mobile library user experience—Taking WeChat library platform of Chongqing University as an example [J]. Journal of the National Library of China, 2018, 27(5): 21-31.)
|
[28] |
刘冰, 卢爽. 基于用户体验的信息质量综合评价体系研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2011, 55(22): 56-59. (LIU B, LU S. Information quality comprehensive evaluation system based on user experience [J]. Library and information service, 2011, 55(22): 56-59.)
|
[29] |
VINODH S, KUMAR C S. Application of fuzzy QFD for enabling leanness in a manufacturing organization[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2011, 49(6): 1627-1644.
|
[30] |
MOSKOWITZ H, KIM K J. QFD optimizer: a novice friendly quality function deployment decision support system for optimizing product designs[J]. Computers & industrial engineering, 1997, 32(3): 641-655.
|
[31] |
LIU H T. Product design and selection using fuzzy QFD and fuzzy MCDM approaches[J]. Applied mathematical modelling, 2011, 35(1): 482-496.
|
[32] |
CHEN Y, FUNG R, TANG J. Rating technical attributes in fuzzy QFD by integrating fuzzy weighted average method and fuzzy expected value operator[J]. European journal of operational research, 2006, 174(3): 1553-1566.
|
[33] |
顾双. 基于VIKOR法的房地产企业财务风险评价研究——以恒大集团为例[D]. 杭州:杭州电子科技大学, 2022. (GU S. Research on the financial risk evaluation of real estate industry based on VIKOR method—a case study of Evergrande Group [D]. Hangzhou: Hangzhou Dianzi University, 2022.)
|
[34] |
孙君, 钟茂林, 张中华, 等. 绿色供应链管理能力指标体系构建与评价研究[J]. 数学的实践与认识, 2019, 49(8): 89-102. (SUN J, ZHONG M L, ZHANG Z H, et al. Research construction and assessment of indicator system on green supply chain management capability [J]. Mathematics in practice and theory, 2019, 49(8): 89-102.)
|
冯 缨:提供研究思路,指导写作;
方正伟:收集、分析数据,撰写文章;
孙晓阳:指导写作,参与文章修订。
/
〈 |
|
〉 |