
企业危机事件中网络舆情热度生成影响因素研究——基于60个企业危机事件网络舆情案例的fsQCA分析
许成斌, 夏志杰
知识管理论坛 ›› 2024, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (2) : 195-207.
企业危机事件中网络舆情热度生成影响因素研究——基于60个企业危机事件网络舆情案例的fsQCA分析
Research on the Influencing Factors of Online Public Opinion Heat Generation in Corporate Crisis Events:Based on fsQCA Analysis of 60 Online Public Opinion Cases in Corporate Crisis Events
[目的/意义] 企业危机事件频发导致高热度网络舆情不断涌现,这给企业处理突发危机舆情的能力带来重大挑战,因此如何把握危机舆情热度生成规律成为企业危机管理中亟待处理的问题。[方法/过程] 选择企业危机舆情作为研究对象,基于拉斯韦尔5W传播要素理论,运用模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA)方法,基于组态视角探索5W传播要素相互作用对于舆情热度生成的多条路径,通过综合考虑分析传播要素之间的协同驱动关系及作用,试图厘清企业危机事件中网络舆情热度生成的路径及内在机理。[结果/结论] 研究发现:传播效率中的峰值传播速度以及信息人中的领袖媒体占比是企业危机事件网络舆情热度生成的关键条件,在高热度生成结果中,高峰值传播速度以及高领袖媒体占比发挥核心驱动作用;在低热度生成结果中,低领袖媒体占比发挥核心驱动作用。各个传播要素以多条协同路径共同作用于企业危机事件舆情热度生成结果。
[Purpose/Significance] The frequent occurrence of corporate crisis events has led to the emergence of high-heat online public opinion, which has brought significant challenges to the ability of corporations to deal with sudden crisis public opinion, so how to grasp the law of generating heat of crisis public opinion has become an urgent issue to be dealt with in corporate crisis management. [Methodology/Process] Selecting corporate crisis public opinion as the research object, based on Lasswell's 5W communication element theory, using fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) method, exploring the multiple paths of the interaction of the 5W communication elements for the generation of public opinion heat based on the grouping perspective, and analyzing the synergistic driving relationship and the role of the communication elements, we attempted to clarify the paths of the generation of online public opinion heat in corporate crisis events by considering the synergistic driving relationship and the role of the communication elements. and the inner mechanism. [Result/Conclusion] The study found that the peak communication speed in communication efficiency and the leader media share among informants are the key conditions for generating online public opinion heat of corporate crisis events. In the high heat generation results, the peak communication speed and the high leader media share play a core driving role; in the low heat generation results, the low leader media share plays a core driving role. Various communication elements work together in multiple synergistic paths to generate the public opinion heat of corporate crisis events.
企业危机事件 / 网络舆情 / 拉斯韦尔5W / fsQCA
corporate crisis events / online public opinion / Laswell 5W / FsQCA
[1] |
王满仓,佘镜怀,王伟.现代企业危机管理理论综述[J].经济学动态,2004(3):80-83.(WANG M C, SHE J H,WANG W. A review of modern enterprise crisis management theories[J]. Economics news,2004(3):80-83.)
|
[2] |
阎海燕,詹凌云,陈明明,等.基于系统动力学的企业危机事件网络舆情传播与应对研究[J].系统科学学报,2021,29(1):92-97.(YANG H Y,ZHAN L Y,CHEN M M, et al. A study of online public opinion dissemination and response to corporate crisis events based on system dynamics[J]. Journal of systems science,2021,29(1):92-97.)
|
[3] |
谢乐,杨波,杨美芳,等.企业危机事件网络舆情负性偏向驱动机制研究——基于40个案例的两阶段fsQCA分析[J].管理评论,2023,35(7):339-352.(XIE L,YANG B,YANG M F, et al. Research on the diving mechanism of negative bias of online public opinion in corporate crisis events—a two-stage fsQCA analysis based on 40 cases[J]. Management commentary,2023,35(7):339-352.)
|
[4] |
何奇龙,罗兴,王先甲.突发危机事件负面网络舆情化解的随机演化博弈分析[J].经济与管理,2023,37(2):20-29.(HE Q L, LUO X, WANG X J. Stochastic evolutionary game analysis of negative online public opinion resolution in unexpected crisis events[J]. Economy and management,2023,37(2):20-29.)
|
[5] |
孙瑞英.网络舆情治理的协调性惩罚自组织演化机制研究[J].现代情报,2020,40(5):122-129,168.(SUN R Y. Research on the self-organized evolution mechanism of coordinative punishment for online public opinion governance[J]. Modern intelligence,2020,40(5):122-129,168.)
|
[6] |
胡吉明,杨泽贤.突发公共事件网络舆情热度关键影响因素识别研究[J].情报杂志,2022,41(5):112-117,182.(HU J M,YANG Z X. A study on the identification of key influencing factors on the heat of online public opinion of public emergencies[J]. Journal of intelligence,2022,41(5):112-117,182.)
|
[7] |
冯佳昊,韩玮,陈安.基于BDI-Agent模型的突发公共卫生事件公众应急信息传播机制建模研究[J].现代情报,2022,42(10):110-122.(FENG J H, HAN W, CHEN A. Modeling research on public emergency information dissemination mechanism for public health emergencies based on BDI-Agent model[J]. Modern intelligence,2022,42(10):110-122.)
|
[8] |
李艳微,包磊.基于融媒体技术的中国话语舆情传播引导机制研究[J].情报科学,2022,40(11):40-48,109.(LI Y W, BAO L. Research on the dissemination and guidance mechanism of Chinese discourse and public opinion based on integrated media technology[J]. Intelligence science,2022,40(11):40-48,109.)
|
[9] |
杨波,谢乐.企业危机事件网络舆情传播态势生成机理研究——基于信息生态的多阶段fsQCA分析[J].管理评论,2022,34(7):339-352.(YANG B, XIE L. Research on the mechanism of generating online public opinion communication posture in corporate crisis events--a multi-stage fsQCA analysis based on information ecology[J]. Management review,2022,34(7):339-352.)
|
[10] |
张亚明,高祎晴,宋雯婕等.信息生态视域下网络舆情反转生成机理研究——基于40个案例的模糊集定性比较分析[J].情报科学,2023,41(3):66-73.(ZHANG Y M, GAO Y Q, SONG W J, et al. Research on the generation mechanism of online public opinion reversal under the view of information ecology--a qualitative comparative analysis of fuzzy sets based on 40 cases[J]. Intelligence science,2023,41(3):66-73.)
|
[11] |
胡象明,刘腾.突发公共卫生事件网络舆情影响力生成机理及风险规避[J].山东社会科学,2023(2):96-107.(HU X M, LIU T. Generation mechanism and risk avoidance of network public opinion influence on public health emergencies[J]. Shandong social science,2023(2):96-107.)
|
[12] |
MENG L , QI K , HAN C , et al. A multi-agent model for simulation of public crisis information dissemination[J]. International journal of wireless & mobile computing, 2016, 11(1):33-41.
|
[13] |
孙倬,赵红,王宗水.网络舆情研究进展及其主题关联关系路径分析[J].图书情报工作,2021,65(7):143-154.(SUN Z, ZHAO H, WANG Z S. Progress of network public opinion research and its path analysis of thematic correlation relationship[J]. Library and intelligence work,2021,65(7):143-154.)
|
[14] |
张世昌.大数据时代网络舆情治理中公众参与的困境与完善[J].新疆社会科学,2023(1):128-136,146.(ZHANG S C. Dilemma and improvement of public participation in online public opinion governance in the era of big data[J]. Xinjiang social science,2023(1):128-136,146.)
|
[15] |
RAGIN C. C. Redesigning social inquiry: fuzzy sets and beyond[J]. Social forces, 2010, 88(4):1936-1938.
|
[16] |
ROIG-TIERNO N, GONZALEZ-CRUZ T F, LLOPIS-MARTINEZ J. An overview of qualitative comparative analysis: a bibliometric analysis[J].Journal of innovation & knowledge,2017,2(1): 15-23.
|
[17] |
CHIARA C, CORTESE D, MOSCA F, et al. Paradoxes and strategies in social enterprises’ dual logics enactment: a csQCA between Italy and the United Kingdom[J].Journal of business research,2020,115(1): 334-347.
|
[18] |
FISS P C. A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations[J]. Academy of management review, 2007, 32(4), 1180-1198.
|
[19] |
吴芃,陈依旋,卢珊,等.企业负面事件社交媒体回应策略及其市场反应:来自新浪微博的证据[J].东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2022,24(4):82-100,147-148.(WU P, CHEN Y C, LU S, et al. Social media response strategies to negative corporate events and their market reactions: evidence from Sina Weibo[J]. Journal of Southeast University (Philosophy and Social Science Edition),2022,24(4):82-100,147-148.)
|
[20] |
郑思佳,汪雪锋,刘玉琴,等.关键核心技术竞争态势评估研究[J].科研管理,2021,42(10):1-10.(ZHENG S J, WANG X F, LIU Y Q, et al. Research on the assessment of competitive situation of key core technologies[J]. Research management,2021,42(10):1-10.)
|
[21] |
李磊,支梅,李睿涵.新冠肺炎突发公共卫生事件网络舆情传播动力学[J].西安科技大学学报,2022,42(1):47-54.(LI L, ZHI M, LI R H. Dynamics of online public opinion dissemination of the new coronary pneumonia public health emergencies[J]. Journal of Xi'an University of Science and Technology,2022,42(1):47-54.)
|
[22] |
朱珺彤,单晓红.突发事件网络舆情危机的生成机理研究——基于21个突发事件网络舆情案例的fsQCA分析[J].情报探索,2022(3):40-48.(ZHU J T, SHAN X H. A study on the generation mechanism of critical incident online public opinion crisis--an fsQCA analysis based on 21 critical incident online public opinion cases[J]. Intelligence exploration,2022(3):40-48.)
|
[23] |
杜运周,刘秋辰,陈凯薇,等.营商环境生态、全要素生产率与城市高质量发展的多元模式——基于复杂系统观的组态分析[J].管理世界,2022,38(9):127-145.(DU Y Z, LIU Q C, CHEN K W, et al. Multiple models of business environment ecology, total factor productivity and urban high-quality development - a group analysis based on the complex system view[J]. Management world,2022,38(9):127-145.)
|
[24] |
杜运周,刘秋辰,程建青.什么样的营商环境生态产生城市高创业活跃度?——基于制度组态的分析[J].管理世界,2020,36(9):141-155.(DU Y Z, LIU Q C, CHENG J Q. What kind of business environment ecology generates high entrepreneurial activity in cities? --an analysis based on institutional grouping[J]. Management world,2020,36(9):141-155.)
|
[25] |
杜运周, 贾良定. 组态视角与定性比较分析 (QCA): 管理学研究的一条新道路[J]. 管理世界, 2017, 28(6): 155-167.(DU Y Z, JIA L D. Group perspective and qualitative comparative analysis (QCA): a new path for management research[J]. Management world, 2017, 28(6): 155-167.)
|
[26] |
李晚莲,高光涵.突发公共事件网络舆情热度生成机理研究——基于48个案例的模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA)[J].情报杂志,2020,39(7):94-100.(LI W L, GAO G H. Research on the mechanism of generating online public opinion heat in public emergencies--fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) based on 48 cases[J]. Journal of intelligence,2020,39(7):94-100.)
|
许成斌:确定论文主题,进行数据收集与论文撰写;
夏志杰:指导研究思路,修改论文。
/
〈 |
|
〉 |