国内外信息茧房、回音室和过滤气泡的研究进展——基于文献计量的可视化对比分析

丁绪武; 吴忠; 夏志杰

doi:10.13266/j.issn.2095-5472.2022.051

PDF(3002 KB)

知识管理论坛 ›› 2022, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (6) : 638-651. DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.2095-5472.2022.051

面向全社会的知识服务新兴模式专辑

国内外信息茧房、回音室和过滤气泡的研究进展——基于文献计量的可视化对比分析

丁绪武 ¹^,² ,
吴忠 ¹ ,
夏志杰 ²

作者信息 +

Research Progress of Information Cocoon, Echo Chamber and Filter Bubble at Home and Abroad——Visual Comparative Analysis Based on Bibliometrics

Ding Xuwu ¹^,² ,
Wu Zhong ¹ ,
Xia Zhijie ²

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

[目的/意义]将信息茧房、回音室和过滤气泡三者进行结合研究，重点分析各自研究领域的不同和联系。[方法/过程]采用可视化的文献计量研究方法，广泛收集2006-2021年的国内外有关研究文献，对信息茧房、回音室和过滤气泡的研究脉络进行了梳理与对比分析，并设置群体极化作为辅助研究对象进行补充。[结果/结论]研究结果发现：①国内外学者普遍认为信息茧房、回音室和过滤气泡都会导致群体极化的产生，其中以信息茧房最为明显；②发文量方面国内多与国外，国内外相关研究可分为4个研究主题，且在具体细分领域二者之间有明显区别；③国内研究多集中于概念的界定以及带来的不良后果分析，研究方法多以定性研究为主，而国外研究则侧重于对以上三者产生的机理研究，研究方法多以定量研究为主；④国内外相关研究的未来发展趋势一致，即将情绪维度作为研究以上三者产生机理的一个重要研究对象。

Abstract

[Purpose/Significance] This study is to combine information cocoon, echo chamber and filter bubble, and focuses on the differences and connections between their respective research areas. [Method/Process] Advances in technology were quietly changing the pattern of user information behavior, and the problem of information narrowing brought about by information cocoons, echo chambers and filter bubble effects was gradually drawing the attention of scholars. Using a visual bibliometric research method, this study extensively collected relevant domestic and international research literature from 2006-2021, and combed through the research lineage of information cocoon, echo chamber and filter bubble with a comparative analysis, and set up group polarization as a secondary research object to supplement. [Result/Conclusion]The results of the study found that: ①domestic and international scholars generally agreed that information cocoon, echo chamber and filter bubble all led to group polarization, among which information cocoon was the most obvious; ②in terms of the number of publications, domestic and foreign research could be divided into four research themes, and there was a clear difference between the two in specific areas; ③domestic studies mostly focused on the definition of the concept and the analysis of the adverse consequences, and the research methods were mostly qualitative, while foreign studies focused on the mechanism of the above three, and the research methods were mostly quantitative; ④the future trend of related research at home and abroad was consistent, namely, the emotional dimension as an important research object to study the mechanism of the above three generation.

导出引用

丁绪武 , 吴忠 , 夏志杰. 国内外信息茧房、回音室和过滤气泡的研究进展——基于文献计量的可视化对比分析[J]. 知识管理论坛. 2022, 7(6): 638-651 https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.2095-5472.2022.051

Ding Xuwu , Wu Zhong , Xia Zhijie. Research Progress of Information Cocoon, Echo Chamber and Filter Bubble at Home and Abroad——Visual Comparative Analysis Based on Bibliometrics[J]. Knowledge Management Forum. 2022, 7(6): 638-651 https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.2095-5472.2022.051

中图分类号： G203

参考文献

列表( 原文顺序 | 文献年度倒序 | 文中引用次数倒序 ) 可视化分析

[1]	SUNSTEIN C R. How many minds produce knowledge [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press , 2006. 本文引用 [1]

[2]	桑斯坦.信息乌托邦——众人如何生产知识[M]. 毕竞悦，译.北京：法律出版社，2008. 本文引用 [1]

[3]	PARISER E. The filter bubble: what the Internet is hiding from you [M]. New York: The Penguin Press, 2011. 本文引用 [1]

[4]	STONER J A F. A comparison of individual and group decisions involving risk[D]．Massachusetts: Institute of Technology, 1961. 本文引用 [1]

[5]	相喜伟,王秋菊.网络舆论传播中群体极化的成因与对策[J].新闻界,2009(5):94-95. 本文引用 [1]

[6]	周敏,王莹.从地方网络论坛舆情生成看网络问政的新模式[J].现代传播（中国传媒大学学报）,2010(7):119-122.

[7]	史波.网络舆情群体极化的动力机制与调控策略研究[J].情报杂志,2010,29(7):50-53,69. 本文引用 [1]

[8]	梁新华,张冬梅.新媒体影响政府决策的机理、效应及优化路径[J].情报杂志,2014,33(7):151-155,127. 本文引用 [1]

[9]	黄微,宋先智,高俊峰.网络舆情场中信息受众观点群落的连接鲁棒性测度及实证研究[J].情报学报,2017,36(5):503-510.

[10]	任福兵.网络危机信息传播的基本规律分析[J].情报理论与实践,2014,37(4):42-47,31. 本文引用 [1]

[11]	王世雄,祝锡永,潘旭伟,等.网络舆情演化中群体极化的形成机理研究[J].情报学报,2014,33(6):614-622. 本文引用 [1]

[12]	高歌,张艺炜,丁宇,等.基于系统动力学的网络舆情演进机理及影响力研究[J].情报理论与实践,2016,39(12):39-45,24. 本文引用 [1]

[13]	李珍晖,朱婷婷.信息扩散与内容生成:个性化新闻平台发展研究[J].现代传播（中国传媒大学学报）,2017,39(3):160-162. 本文引用 [1]

[14]	王茜.打开算法分发的“黑箱”——基于今日头条新闻推送的量化研究[J].新闻记者,2017(9):7-14.

[15]	柳旭东,李喜根,刘洋.互联网传播环境下的选择性接触与偏轨接触[J].学海,2017(2):123-129. 本文引用 [1]

[16]	王益成,王萍,贾琼.基于中医临床理论的内容智能分发平台“信息茧房”系统量化模型研究[J].现代情报,2018,38(9):36-40. 本文引用 [1]

[17]	陈华珊,王呈伟.茧房效应与新闻消费行为模式——以腾讯新闻客户端用户评论数据为例[J].社会科学,2019(11):73-87.

[18]	翟姗姗,胡畔,吴璇，等.基于用户信息行为的新媒体社交平台信息茧房现象及其破茧策略研究——以非遗短视频传播为例[J].情报科学,2021,39(10):118-125.

[19]	张海.基于扎根理论的网络用户信息茧房形成机制的质性研究[J].情报杂志,2021,40(3):168-174.

[20]	姜婷婷,许艳闰.窄化的信息世界：国外信息茧房、选择性接触与回音室研究进展[J].图书情报知识,2021,38(5):134-144. 本文引用 [1]

[21]	高艺畅,孙英苹,刘凤鸣，等.社交网络舆情传播的回音室效应研究[J].情报理论与实践,2022,45(4):58-66. 本文引用 [2]

[22]	卢智增,高翔.社交媒体平台群体极化的形成机理与引导策略研究[J].情报理论与实践,2021,44(8):51-58. 本文引用 [1]

[23]	胡键.算法治理及其伦理[J].行政论坛,2021,28(4):41-49.

[24]	董方旭,康许培,赵乐群.算法推荐机制下“过滤气泡”的形成、影响与规避[J].新闻爱好者,2020(11):44-49. 本文引用 [2]

[25]	FISCHER P, SCHULZ-HARDT S, FREY D. Selective exposure and information quantity: how different information quantities moderate decision makers' preference for consistent and inconsistent information [J]. Journal of personality and social psychology, 2008, 94(2): 231–244. 本文引用 [1]

[26]	PARK H S, LEVINE T R, KINGSLEY WESTERMAN C Y, et al. The effects of argument quality and involvement type on attitude formation and attitude change: a test of dual-process and social judgment predictions [J]. Human communication research, 2007, 33(1): 81–102.

[27]	LYN M. VAN S. Extreme members and group polarization [J]. Social influence, 2009, 4(3):185-199. 本文引用 [1]

[28]	BAKSHY E, MESSING S, ADAMIC L A. Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook [J]. Science, 2015, 348(6239): 1130–1132. 本文引用 [1]

[29]	DEL VICARIO M, VIVALDO G, BESSI A, et al. Echo chambers: emotional contagion and group polarization on Facebook [J]. Scientific reports, 2016, 6(1): 37825.

[30]	BRADY, WILLIAM J, WILLS, et al. Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2017, 114(28): 7313–7318. 本文引用 [1]

[31]	SCHMIDT A L, ZOLLO F, SCALA A, et al. Polarization of the vaccination debate on Facebook[J]. Vaccine, 2018, 36(25); 3606-3612. 本文引用 [1]

[32]	TÖRNBERG P. Echo chambers and viral misinformation: modeling fake news as complex contagion [J]. PLOS ONE, 2018, 13(9): e0203958.

[33]	CINELLI M, MORALES G, GALEAZZI A, et al. The echo chamber effect on social media [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2021, 118(9): 1-8.

[34]

ROBERTSON R E, LAZER D, WILSON C, et al. Auditing the personalization and composition of politically-related search engine results pages [C]//Proceedings of the 2018 world wide Web conference (WWW '18) international world wide Web conferences steering committee, republic and canton of Geneva, New York: ACM, 2019: 955–965.

[35]	GUESS A M, NYHAN B, REIFLER J. Exposure to untrustworthy websites in the 2016 US election [J]. Nature human behavior, 2020, 4(05): 472–480. 本文引用 [1]

[36]	何杨,李洪心,杨毅.新媒体环境下网络群体极化动力机理与引导策略研究——以内容智能分发平台为例[J].情报科学,2019,37(3):146-151,168. 本文引用 [1]

[37]	李晓云,王锋.“信息茧房”概念外延的合理性考察[J].青年记者,2021(24):35-37. 本文引用 [1]

[38]	阎国华,闫晨.网络圈群栖居对大学生价值观的影响及应对[J].中国青年社会科学,2021,40(2):54-61. 本文引用 [1]

[39]	韩志超,邹吉鹏.智能传播“过滤气泡”效应对青年价值观建构的风险与应对[J].出版广角,2021(17):88-90.

[40]	王云芳,焦运佳.网络空间中民族民粹主义的逻辑机理与类型比较——基于网络“回音室”效应的视角[J].学术界,2019(4):84-91.

[42]	张艺炜,邓三鸿,王昊,等.基于系统动力学的社交网络环境下消费者意见领袖影响力建模与仿真[J].图书与情报,2018(6):63-71. 本文引用 [1]

[42]	汤景泰,陈秋怡.意见领袖的跨圈层传播与“回音室效应”——基于深度学习文本分类及社会网络分析的方法[J].现代传播(中国传媒大学学报),2020,42(5):25-33.

[43]	赫泉玲,肖剑.网络民意的形成机制及其理性表达的引导策略[J].情报科学,2013,31(4):89-95. 本文引用 [2]

[44]	韩苗苗.旅游突发事件网络舆情的成因与对策——以青岛“天价虾”事件为例[J].青年记者,2016(2):7-8.

[45]	成涛,谭雅颖.自媒体时代下高校突发事件网络舆情挑战和应对[J].湖南社会科学,2019(3):164-167.

[46]	卢涛.青年网络政治参与的作用与发展[J].中国青年社会科学,2016,35(6):15-19. 本文引用 [1]

[47]	王军峰.算法推荐机制对用户议程的影响与反思——基于技术与社会互动的视角[J].未来传播,2021,28(5):21-28. 本文引用 [1]

[48]	靖鸣,蔡文玲.“信息茧房”负效应消解的路径选择[J].学习与实践,2020(6):125-131. 本文引用 [1]

[49]	刘博.系统思维视域下重大突发公共事件舆论引导的困境与突破[J].湖北社会科学,2020(8):35-41,51. 本文引用 [1]

[50]	WANG X, SONG Y. Viral misinformation and echo chambers: the diffusion of rumors about genetically modified organisms on social media [J]. Internet research, 2020, 30(5): 1547-1564. 本文引用 [1]

[51]	SINDERMANN C, ELHAI J D, MOSHAGEN M, et al. Age, gender, personality, ideological attitudes and individual differences in a person's news spectrum: how many and who might be prone to “filter bubbles” and “echo chambers” online? [J]. Heliyon, 2020, 6(1): e03214. 本文引用 [1]

[52]	GHARAHIGHEHI A, VENS C. Diversification in session-based news recommender systems [J]. Personal and ubiquitous computing, 2021, 5(12): 199-213. 本文引用 [1]

[53]	GE Y P, ZHAO S Y, ZHOU H L, et al. Understanding echo chambers in e-commerce recommender systems [C]//Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval. Association for computing machinery, New York: ACM, 2020: 2261-2270. 本文引用 [2]

[54]	KWAK N, LANE D S, WEEKS B E, et al. Now we’re talking? understanding the interplay between online selective and incidental exposure and their influence on online cross-cutting political discussion [J]. Social science computer review. 2022, 40(3): 579-597. 本文引用 [1]

[55]	KAKIUCHI K, NISHIGUCHI M, TORIUMI F, et al. What influences people to broaden their horizons? [C]//Proceedings of 2018 IEEE/WIC/ACM International conference on Web intelligence (WI). Santiago: Association for Computing Machinery, 2018: 89-95.

[56]	MENDOZA M, TESCONI M, CRESCI S. Bots in social and interaction networks: detection and impact estimation[J]. ACM transactions on information systems, 2020, 39(1):1-32. 本文引用 [1]

[57]	DICKINSON D L , KAKOSCHKE N . Seeking confirmation? biased information search and deliberation in the food domain[J]. Food quality and preference, 2021, 91(2):104189. 本文引用 [1]

[58]	GAO J, HAO F, MIN G Y, et al. Maximal multipolarized cliques search in signed networks[C]//Proceedings of the 44th international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2021: 2227-2231. 本文引用 [1]

[59]	KASHIMA Y, PERFORS A, FERDINAND V, et al. Ideology, communication and polarization[J]. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society B biological sciences, 2021, 376(1822):20200133. 本文引用 [1]

[60]

ARUNKUMAR B, PEDRAM B, SHANNON R, et al. Examining untempered social media: analyzing cascades of polarized conversations [C]//Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE/ACM international conference on advances in social networks analysis and mining. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2019: 625-632.

本文引用 [1]

[61]	MOLLEMAN L, TUMP A N, GRADASSI A, et al. Strategies for integrating disparate social information[J]. The Royal Society, 2020(1939): 118-128. 本文引用 [1]

[62]	张海.网络用户信息茧房形成机制的概念框架研究[J].情报理论与践,2021,44(11):60-64,107. 本文引用 [1]

[63]	袁顺波.网络环境下科研人员信息茧房的成因要素研究[J].情报理论与践,2022,45(2):43-48.

[64]	张玥,赵颖.移动阅读环境下信息茧房成因探析[J].现代情报,2021,41(10):3-11. 本文引用 [1]

[65]	晏婉暄,艾文华,胡广伟.偶遇信息分享行为的影响因素组态路径研究：基于fsQCA与多元回归的双重分析[J].情报理论与实践,2021,44(11):133-142. 本文引用 [1]

[66]	周文杰,包赟琪.信息贫富分化的“时间悖论”——基于个人信息世界边界要素的实证检验[J].图书情报知识,2021,38(6):73-86. 本文引用 [1]

[67]	宋辰婷.突发公共卫生事件中的情感治理——以新冠肺炎疫情为例[J].福建论坛(人文社会科学版),2020(3):45-53. 本文引用 [1]

[68]	曹帅.新时代网络政治情绪的生成逻辑与治理维度[J].情报杂志,2019,38(1):106-111.

[69]	党明辉.公共舆论中负面情绪化表达的框架效应——基于在线新闻跟帖评论的计算机辅助内容分析[J].新闻与传播研究,2017,24(4):41-63,127.

[70]	丁绪武,吴忠,夏志杰.社会媒体中情绪因素对用户转发行为影响的实证研究——以新浪微博为例[J].现代情报,2014,34(11):147-155. 本文引用 [1]

[71]	MATAKOS A, TU S, GIONIS A. Tell me something my friends do not know: diversity maximization in social networks[J]. Knowledge and information systems, 2020, 62(9):3697-3726. 本文引用 [1]

[72]	SONG H, LU H, MCCOMAS K A. The role of fairness in early characterization of new technologies: effects on selective exposure and risk perception[J]. Risk analysis, 2020, 41(9): 1614-1629. 本文引用 [1]

[73]	UYHENG J, NG L H X, CARLEY K M. Active, aggressive, but to little avail: characterizing bot activity during the 2020 Singaporean elections[J]. Computational and mathematical organization theory, 2021(1172):1-19.

[74]	LUKYANOVA G V, MARTYANOV D S. Influence of communication strategies on the structure of political discussions[C]//Proceedings of 2021 communication strategies in digital society seminar (ComSDS).New York: IEEE, 2021. 本文引用 [1]

[75]	ZHU J, NI P, TONG G, et al. Influence maximization problem with echo chamber effect in social network[J]. IEEE transactions on computational social systems, 2021, 99:1-9. 本文引用 [1]

[76]	KUAN C L, SHIH C D, XIONG A P, et al. Escape from an echo chamber[C]// Companion proceedings of the Web conference 2021 (WWW '21). New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2021: 713-716. 本文引用 [1]

[77]	TABRIZI S A, SHAKERY A. Perspective-based search: a new paradigm for bursting the information bubble[J]. Facets, 2019, 4(1):350-388. 本文引用 [1]

[78]	WANG P, SHI H M, WU X J, et al. Sentiment analysis of rumor spread amid COVID-19: based on Weibo text[J]. Healthcare , 2021, 9(10): 1275-1288. 本文引用 [1]

[79]	KANG E J, CIN Y H, YONG S C. Crowd forest: a visualization tool for opinion sharing based-on semantic figurative metaphors[C]//Proceedings of the 25th international conference on intelligent user interfaces companion. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2020: 97-98. 本文引用 [1]