
国外政务社交媒体:研究现状、热点与演进趋势
Foreign Government Social Media:Research Status, Hot Topics and Evolution Trend
[目的/意义]旨在实现对国外政务社交媒体研究的全景式认知,推动国内政务社交媒体研究和治理实践的发展。[方法/过程]基于2000-2020年Web of Science核心合集,运用Cite Space V可视化知识网络分析工具和文献计量法,定量分析国外政务社交媒体的研究现状、热点和演进趋势。[结果/结论]研究热点具体表现为:政务社交媒体采纳的影响因素(学习最佳实践、竞争、领导授权、公众压力)和使用策略(推动策略、拉拢策略、建立互动网络策略等);政务社交媒体的使用效果(政府透明、政府信任度、公众参与、政府创新);政务社交媒体面临的问题、机遇与挑战(信息安全、数字鸿沟、政府信任度低等)。演进趋势为:政务社交媒体实现了从发展电子政务到公众参与的大飞跃。最后,基于国外政务社交媒体的研究,给出了我国政务社交媒体研究的启示。
[Purpose/significance] Realizing the panoramic cognition of foreign government social media is helpful to promote the development of domestic government social media research and governance practice. [Method/process] Based on Web of Science core database (2000-2020), this paper applied the bibliometric method and the visualized knowledge network analysis tool Cite Space V to make a quantitative analysis of foreign government social media knowledge base, hot topic and evolution trend. [Result/conclusion] The hot topics are shown as follows: the knowledge base of research on foreign government social, mainly including the determinants of the adoption of government social media (learning best practice, competition, leadership authorization, public pressure, etc.) and the use strategies (push tactics, pull tactics, network tactics, etc.); the effectiveness of the government’s using of social media (government transparency, government trust, public participation, government innovation); problems, opportunities and challenges of government social media (information security, digital divide, low government trust, etc.). Evolution trend: government social media has achieved a great leap from the development of e-government to citizen participation. Finally, based on the study of foreign government social media, the enlightenment of domestic government social media research was given.
政务社交媒体 / 政务新媒体 / 可视化分析 / 文献计量法
government social media / government new media / visualization analysis / bibliometric analysis
[1] |
刘琼,彭丹萍,刘安一凡. 2018联合国电子政务调查报告提出这五大关键词[EB/OL].[2020-05-25]. http://www.yidianzixun.com/article/0JndsfwX. 2018.
|
[2] |
MERGEL I. A framework for interpreting social media interactions in the public sector [J]. Government information quarterly, 2013(30): 327-334.
|
[3] |
PANAGIOTOPOULOS P, BIGDELI A Z, SAMS S. Citizen–government collaboration on social media: the case of Twitter in the 2011 riots in England [J]. Government information quarterly, 2014, 31(3): 349-357.
|
[4] |
MERGEL I. The social media innovation challenge in the public sector [J]. Information polity, 2012, 17(3/4): 281-292.
|
[5] |
吴云,胡广伟.政务社交媒体研究进展[J].电子政务, 2013(5): 42-50.
|
[6] |
谢丽娜.政务社交媒体中用户信息获取影响因素研究述评[J].图书情报工作,2015, 59(19): 113-121.
|
[7] |
黄磊,赵延东,梅亮.社交媒体个人数据资源的多边市场竞争研究——基于k核凝聚子网的实证解析[J]. 软科学,2019,33(6): 1-7.
|
[8] |
BERTOT J C, JAEGER P T, GRIMES J M. Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: e-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies [J]. Government information quarterly,2010, 27(3): 264-271.
|
[9] |
BONSÓN E, TORRES L, ROYO S, et al. Local e-government 2.0: social media and corporate transparency in municipalities [J]. Government information quarterly, 2012, 29(2): 123-132.
|
[10] |
LINDERS D. From E-government to We-government: defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media [J]. Government information quarterly, 2012, 29(4): 446-454.
|
[11] |
BERTOT J C, JAEGER P T, HANSEN D. The impact of polices on government social media usage: issues, challenges, and recommendations [J]. Government information quarterly, 2012, 29(1): 30-40.
|
[12] |
MERGEL I. Social media adoption and resulting tactics in the U.S. Federal Government [J]. Government information quarterly, 2013, 30(2): 123-130.
|
[13] |
MOSSBERGER K, WU Y, CRAWFORD J. Connecting citizens and local governments? social media and interactivity in major U.S. cities [J]. Government information quarterly, 2013, 30(4): 351-358.
|
[14] |
KAPLAN A M, HAENLEIN M. Users of the world, unite! the challenges and opportunities of social media [J]. Business horizons, 2010, 53(1): 59-68.
|
[15] |
PICAZO-VELA S, GUTIÉRREZ-MARTÍNEZ I, LUNA-REYES L F. Understanding risks, benefits, and strategic alternatives of social media applications in the public sector [J]. Government information quarterly, 2012, 29(4): 504-511.
|
[16] |
CRIADO J I, SANDOVAL-ALMAZAN R, GIL-GARCIA J R. Government innovation through social media [J]. Government information quarterly, 2013, 30(4): 319-326.
|
[17] |
KAVANAUGH A L, FOX E A, SHEETZ S D, et al. Social media use by government: from the routine to the critical [J]. Government information quarterly, 2012, 29(4): 480-491.
|
[18] |
SEUNGAHN NAH G D S. Modeling the adoption and use of social media by nonprofit organizations [J]. New media & society, 2012, 15(2): 294-313.
|
[19] |
GUILLAMÓN M, RÍOS A, GESUELE B, et al. Factors influencing social media use in local governments: the case of Italy and Spain [J]. Government information quarterly, 2016, 33(3): 460-471.
|
[20] |
PICAZO-VELA S, FERNANDEZ-HADDAD M, LUNA-REYES L F. Opening the black box: developing strategies to use social media in government [J]. Government information quarterly, 2016, 33(4): 693-704.
|
[21] |
MEIJER A, THAENS M. Social media strategies: understanding the differences between North American Police Departments [J]. Government information quarterly, 2013, 30(4): 343-350.
|
[22] |
MERGEL I, GREEVES B. Social media in the public sector field guide: designing and implementing strategies and policies [M]. San Francisco:CA, John Wiley & Sons, 2012.
|
[23] |
GÁLVEZ-RODRÍGUEZ M D M, SÁEZ-MARTÍN A, GARCÍA-TABUYO M, et al. Exploring dialogic strategies in social media for fostering citizens’ interactions with Latin American Local Governments [J]. Public relations review, 2018, 44(2): 265-276.
|
[24] |
ALEJANDRO SÁEZ MARTÍN, ARTURO HARO De ROSARIO. Using Twitter for dialogic communication: local government strategies in the European Union [J]. Local government studies, 2015, 41(3): 421-444.
|
[25] |
EOM S, HWANG H, KIM J H. Can social media increase government responsiveness? a case study of Seoul, Korea [J]. Government information quarterly, 2018, 35(1): 109-122.
|
[26] |
PENNEY J. Social media and symbolic action: exploring participation in the Facebook Red Equal Sign Profile Picture Campaign [J]. Journal of computer‐mediated communication, 2015, 20(1): 52-66.
|
[27] |
KARAKIZA M. The impact of social media in the public sector [J]. Procedia - social and behavioral sciences, 2015, 175: 384-392.
|
[28] |
WANG F. Explaining the low utilization of government websites: using a grounded theory approach [J]. Government information quarterly, 2014, 31(4): 610-621.
|
[29] |
LAPPAS G, TRIANTAFILLIDOU A, DELIGIAOURI A, et al. Facebook content strategies and citizens’ online engagement: the case of Greek local governments [J]. The review of socionetwork strategies, 2018, 12(1): 1-20.
|
[30] |
DEPAULA N, DINCELLI E, HARRISON T M. Toward a Typology of government social media communication: democratic goals, symbolic acts and self-presentation [J]. Government information quarterly, 2018, 35(1): 98-108.
|
[31] |
CHOI J M. Factors influencing public officials' responses to requests for information disclosure [J]. Government information quarterly, 2018, 35(1): 30-42.
|
[32] |
MARIUS ROHDE JOHANNESSEN, ØYSTEIN Sæbø, LEIF SKIFTENES FLAK. Social media as public sphere: a stakeholder perspective [J]. Transforming government: people, process and policy, 2016, 10(2): 212-238.
|
[33] |
MEDAGLIA R, ZHU D. Public deliberation on government-managed social media: a study on Weibo users in China [J]. Government information quarterly, 2017, 34(3): 533-544.
|
[34] |
FALCO E, KLEINHANS R. Beyond technology: identifying local government challenges for using digital platforms for citizen engagement [J]. International journal of information management, 2018, 40:17-20.
|
[35] |
ZHENG L. Social media in Chinese government: drivers, challenges and capabilities [J]. Government information quarterly, 2013, 30(4): 369-376.
|
刘焕:负责文献数据收集和分析,论文整体框架设计和内容撰写;
宋苗:负责重要参考文献的述评撰写,论文格式的修改。
/
〈 |
|
〉 |