
数据意识下国内机构知识库学者学术计量评价
Academic Econometric Evaluation of Scholars Based on Data Awareness Using Domestic Institutional Repository
[目的/意义]利用机构知识库蕴含的数据资源参与学术评价是其服务功能的体现,也是从应用层面检验当前机构知识库建设成效的有效途径。[方法/过程]首先介绍国内中科院以及高校两大系统建设的机构知识库中有关学者的内容,概括学者的相关信息资源,指出机构知识库参与学术评价的优势。其次以学者学术计量评价为研究视角,明确机构知识库在计量评价中的作用,并在数据意识导向下考察国内各个机构知识库中关于学者的各类相关信息,使其转化为可以支撑学者学术计量评价的三类数据资源。最后利用机构知识库提出实施学者学术计量评价的先决条件、关键部分以及实施步骤。[结果/结论]机构知识库参与学术评价实践的有效性仍待具体学者学术计量案例检验,机构知识库建设需要具体的科研服务实践来推动。
[Purpose/significance] Data resources of the institutional repository to get involved in academic evaluation show its service function, and actually can test the effectiveness of the current institutional repository construction from the application level. [Method/process] Firstly, this paper introduced the contents of scholars in the institutional repository of Chinese Academy of Sciences and universities, summarized the relevant information of scholars, and demonstrated the advantages of institutional repository in academic evaluation. Then, from the perspective of academic metrology evaluation of scholars, this paper clarified the role of institutional repository in metrological evaluation, and investigated all kinds of relevant information about scholars in domestic institutional repositories under the guidance of data consciousness, so as to transform those relevant information into three types of data resources which should support academic metrological evaluation of scholars. Finally, the prerequisite, key elements and implementation process of applying institutional repository to implement academic metrological evaluation of scholars were proposed. [Result/Conclusion] The effectiveness of institutional repository in the practice of academic evaluation needs to be tested by specific scholars' academic cases, and the construction of institutional repository needs specific scientific research service practice to promote.
机构知识库 / 学者库 / 数据意识 / 学术评价 / 学术计量指标
institutional repository / scholar repository / data awareness / measurement evaluation
[1] |
叶继元.图书馆学学术规范与方法论研究[M].北京:科学出版社,2014.
|
[2] |
邱均平,文庭孝,赵蓉英,等.评价学理论·方法·实践[M].北京:科学出版社,2010.
|
[3] |
赵丹群.定量化学术评价研究的最新进展[J].情报理论与实践,2017,40(4):133-137.
|
[4] |
潘卫.支持拓展应用的机构知识库关键问题探索[EB/OL].[2019-02-03].http://ir.las.ac.cn/handle/12502/8750.
|
[5] |
The Directory of Open Access Repositories-OpenDOAR[EB/OL].[2019-06-16]. http://v2.sherpa.ac.uk/opendoar/.
|
[6] |
龚亦农,朱茗.我国机构知识库建设现状调查[J].数字图书馆论坛,2018(9):20-28.
|
[7] |
赵洁洁,詹华清,介凤.高校机构知识库学术评价功能研究[J].图书馆杂志,2017,36(9):20-25.
|
[8] |
杨柳,丁楠,田稷.Altmetrics视角下机构知识库学者影响力评价研究[J].情报理论与实践,2017,40(6):104-110.
|
[9] |
李朝阳,庞弘燊,赵燕,等.嵌入式科研数据服务策略分析[J].图书馆学研究,2019(16):74-82.
|
[10] |
沈婷婷.数据素养及其对科学数据管理的影响[J].图书馆论坛,2015,35(1):68-73.
|
[11] |
中国科学院文献情报中心机构知识库[EB/OL].[2019-02-08].http://ir.las.ac.cn/browse-author.
|
[12] |
中国科学院文献情报中心(国家图书馆)[EB/OL].[2019-02-08]. http://www.las.ac.cn/others/institute_ir.jsp.
|
[13] |
中国科学院机构知识库服务网格[EB/OL].[2019-02-08].http://www.irgrid.ac.cn/.
|
[14] |
兰州大学机构知识库[EB/OL].[2019-03-07].http://ir.lzu.edu.cn/.
|
[15] |
北京大学学者主页[EB/OL].[2019-03-08].http://scholar.pku.edu.cn/.
|
[16] |
清华大学学者库[EB/OL].[2019-03-09].http://rid.lib.tsinghua.edu.cn/.
|
[17] |
大连理工大学机构知识库[EB/OL].[2019-03-09].http://dlutir.dlut.edu.cn/.
|
[18] |
西北工业大学机构知识库[EB/OL].[2019-03-12].http://ir.nwpu.edu.cn/.
|
[19] |
中国科学院文献情报中心机构知识库[EB/OL].[2020-11-09]. http://ir.las.ac.cn/search-filter?field=dc.type_filter&advanced=false&&field=dc.type_filter&fieldTitle=文献类型&gobackurl=.
|
[20] |
上海大学机构知识库[EB/OL].[2019-03-12].http://ir.shu.edu.cn/.
|
[21] |
叶鹰.国际学术评价指标研究现状及发展综述[J].情报学报,2014,33(2):215-224.
|
[22] |
徐媛媛,朱庆华.社会网络分析法在引文分析中的实证研究[J].情报理论与实践,2008,31(2):184-188.
|
[23] |
王军辉,谭宗颖.基于文献计量的科学创造力评价研究综述[J].图书情报工作,2017,61(3):131-139.
|
[24] |
SOLER J M.A rational indicator of scientific creativity[J].Journal of informetrics, 2007,1(2):123-130.
|
[25] |
王贤文,方志超,胡志刚.科学论文的科学计量分析:数据、方法与用途的整合框架[J].图书情报工作, 2015,59(16):74-82.
|
[26] |
FRENKEN K,HARDEMAN S,HOEKMAN J. Spatial scientometrics: towards a cumulative research program[J].Journal of informetrics,2009,3(3):222-232.
|
[27] |
ACUNA D E,ALLESINA S,KORDING K P,et al. Predicting scientific success[J].Nature, 2012,489(7415):201.
|
[28] |
PORTER A L,RAFPLS I.Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? measuring and mapping six research fields over time[J].Scientometrics,2009,81(3):719.
|
[29] |
杨良斌.科学计量学理论与实例[M].北京:科学技术文献出版社,2014.
|
[30] |
BRILLOUIN L. Science and information theory[M]. New York: Academic Press Inc, 1962.
|
[31] |
SINATRA R, WANG D, DEVILLE P, et al. Quantifying the evolution of individual scientific impact[J].Science,2016,354(6312):aaf5239-aaf5239.
|
杨秦:提出研究思路,撰写论文及修改;
李文林:进行选题指导。
/
〈 |
|
〉 |