[目的/意义] 旨在了解“破五唯”导向下我国高校科研成果评价的实施现状，把握科研评价改革方向，促进高校学术生态健康发展。 [方法/过程] 采用政策文本编码的内容分析方法，对95份高校科研奖励政策文本进行解析，系统梳理不同类型科研成果的评价指标和标准，揭示高校科研成果评价的变革思路。 [结果/结论] 研究发现，高校科研成果主要包括获奖成果、学术论文、学术著作、技术产权类、智库咨询类5种，整体科研奖励制度存在重视程度不均衡、学科分类不充分、定性评价制度不健全等问题。在制度层面，需要完善非论著成果评价、专家评审、学科分类评价以及人机协同评价的相关规定，引导学者回归科学研究的本质。

[Purpose/Significance] In order to understand the implementation status of scientific research achievements evaluation in Chinese universities under the guidance of "Breaking the Five-Only Criteria", grasp the reform direction of scientific research evaluation, and promote the healthy development of academic ecology in universities. [Method/Process] This paper uses the content analysis method based on policy text coding to analyze 95 university research reward policy texts, systematically sort out the evaluation indicators and criteria of different types of scientific research achievements, and reveal the reform ideas of university research achievement evaluation. [Result/Conclusion] It is found that the scientific research achievements of universities include five types: award achievements, academic papers, academic works, technology property rights, think tank consulting results, etc. The overall scientific research reward system has problems such as unbalanced attention, inadequate classification of disciplines, and imperfect qualitative evaluation system. At the institutional level, it is necessary to improve the relevant provisions of non-theoretical results evaluation, expert review, subject classification evaluation, and human-machine collaborative evaluation, and guide scholars to return to the essence of scientific research.