QCA与SEM在图书情报领域的应用比较研究

宋艳辉; 郑晓青

doi:10.13266/j.issn.2095-5472.2025.013

PDF(1764 KB)

知识管理论坛 ›› 2025, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (3) : 199-217. DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.2095-5472.2025.013 CSTR: 32306.14.CN11-6036.2025.013

知识管理的范式跃迁与创新生态重构专辑

QCA与SEM在图书情报领域的应用比较研究

宋艳辉 ,
郑晓青

作者信息 +

A Comparative Study on the Application of SEM and QCA in Library and Information Science

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

[目的/意义] 对定性比较分析（QCA）与结构方程模型（SEM）两种方法进行应用比较分析，为学者选用合适方法研究图书情报领域中的问题提供有益参考，以提升本学科整体研究水平。 [方法/过程] 对QCA和SEM的原理、操作步骤和应用情况进行详尽阐述与对比分析，QCA主要是构建新理论和延伸已有理论，而SEM主要是验证完善已有理论；再分别运用QCA和SEM进行线上知识付费用户持续使用意愿的实证研究。 [结果/结论] 结果显示，两种方法在图书情报领域研究中各有优势与局限，均适合用于探究因果关系。但QCA适合分析图书情报领域内多元复杂关系，而SEM适用于分析变量间净效应关系，同时，SEM在处理潜在变量间较为简单因果关系时更具合理性。QCA在分析小样本数据方面更有优势，可以弥补结构方程仅适合分析大样本数据的局限性。随着混合研究方法的兴起，在图书情报领域，定性比较分析法和结构方程也可以互相合作互补，进一步完善验证研究结论。

Abstract

[Purpose/Significance] Many scholars are using qualitative comparative analysis and structural equation modeling to conduct empirical analysis in the field of library and information, but few relevant studies are comparing the two methods. This study can provide a useful reference for selecting appropriate methods to explore the problems in the field of library and information, which is of great benefit to improving the overall research level of this discipline. [Method/Process] The principle, operation procedure, and application of QCA and SEM are elaborated and compared, and then QCA and SEM are respectively used to conduct an empirical study on the willingness of online knowledge paying users to continue using. [Result/Conclusion] The results showed that there were differences between the two methods. In terms of theoretical basis, QCA theory is based on set theory and Boolean algebra, while SEM theory is based on analysis of variance. In terms of causal analysis, QCA emphasizes equivalence and asymmetry, which is suitable for analyzing complex and interrelated problems with multiple antecedents, and SEM emphasizes linearity and symmetry, which is suitable for analyzing the relationship between two variables. In terms of research objectives, QCA is mainly to construct new theories and extend existing theories, while SEM is mainly to verify and improve existing theories. In terms of logic analysis, QCA is mostly an exploratory analysis method in logic analysis, while SEM is mostly a verification analysis method. In empirical studies, the multiple pathways resulting from QCA can complement the univariate conclusions of SEM.

导出引用

宋艳辉 , 郑晓青. QCA与SEM在图书情报领域的应用比较研究[J]. 知识管理论坛. 2025, 10(3): 199-217 https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.2095-5472.2025.013

Song Yanhui , Zheng Xiaoqing. A Comparative Study on the Application of SEM and QCA in Library and Information Science[J]. Knowledge Management Forum. 2025, 10(3): 199-217 https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.2095-5472.2025.013

中图分类号： G250

参考文献

列表( 原文顺序 | 文献年度倒序 | 文中引用次数倒序 ) 可视化分析

[1]	RAGIN C C. The comparative method: moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies[M].Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987. 本文引用 [2]

[2]	夏鑫, 何建民, 刘嘉毅.定性比较分析的研究逻辑——兼论其对经济管理学研究的启示[J]. 财经研究, 2014, 40(10): 97-107. XIA X, HE J M, LIU J Y. Research logic of qualitative comparative analysis: on its implications for economic management research[J]. Journal of financial and economics, 2014, 40(10): 97-107. 本文引用 [4]

[3]	黄荣贵, 桂勇. 互联网与业主集体抗争：一项基于定性比较分析方法的研究[J]. 社会学研究, 2009, 24(5): 29-56. HUANG G Y, GUI Y. The internet and the collective struggle of owners: a study based on a qualitative comparative analysis method[J]. Sociological studies，2009, 24(5): 29-56. 本文引用 [1]

[4]	RIHOUX B, LOBE B. The case for qualitative comparative analysis (QCA): adding leverage for thick cross-case comparison [M]// The Sage handbook of case-based methods. California: Sage, 2009: 222-242. 本文引用 [1]

[5]	何俊志. 比较政治分析中的模糊集方法[J]. 社会科学, 2013(5): 30-38. HE J Z. Fuzzy-Set methods in comparative political analysis[J]. Journal of social sciences, 2013(5): 30-38. 本文引用 [2]

[6]	SAWY O A EL, MALHOTRA A, PARK Y, et al. Seeking the configurations of digital ecodynamics: it takes three to tango[J]. Information systems research, 2010, 21(4): 835-848. 本文引用 [1]

[7]	倪宁, 杨玉红. 基于模糊集定性比较分析方法改进胜任力建模[J]. 工业工程与管理, 2009, 14(2): 109-113. NI N, YANG Y H. How to apply fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis to competency modeling[J]. Industrial engineering and management, 2009, 14(2): 109-113. 本文引用 [2]

[8]	毛湛文. 定性比较分析(QCA)与新闻传播学研究[J]. 国际新闻界, 2016, 38(4): 6-25. MAO Z W. Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and journalism and communication research[J]. Chinese journal of journalism & communication, 2016, 38(4): 6-25. 本文引用 [2]

[9]	BELL R G, FILATOTCHEV I, AGUILERA R V. Corporate governance and investors’ perceptions of foreign IPO value: an institutional perspective[J]. Academy of management journal, 2014, 57(1): 301-320. 本文引用 [1]

[10]	李蔚, 何海兵. 定性比较分析方法的研究逻辑及其应用[J].上海行政学院报, 2015, 16(5): 92-100. LI W, HE H B. The logic and application of qualitative comparative analysis in social science research[J]. The Journal of Shanghai Administration Institute, 2015, 16(5): 92-100. 本文引用 [1]

[11]	CRONQVIST L. Presentation of TOSMANA adding multi-value variables and visual aids to QCA[EB/OL].[2025-02-12]. https://www.compasss.org/wpseries/Cronqvist2004.pdf 本文引用 [2]

[12]	RIHOUX B, RAGIN C C. Configurational comparative methods: qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques[M]. London: Sage, 2009:152-154. 本文引用 [1]

[13]	CAREN N, PANOFSKY A. TQCA: a technique for adding temporality to qualitative comparative analysis[J]. Sociological methods & research, 2005, 34(2): 147-172. 本文引用 [1]

[14]	HINO A. Time-series QCA studying temporal change through boolean analysis[J]. Sociological theory and methods, 2009, 24(2): 247-265. 本文引用 [1]

[15]	侯杰泰, 成子娟. 结构方程模型的应用及分析策略[J]. 心理学探新, 1999(1): 54-59. HOU J T, CHEN Z J. Application and analysis strategies of structural equation modeling[J]. Psychological exploration, 1999(1): 54-59. 本文引用 [1]

[16]	卞冉, 车宏生, 阳辉. 项目组合在结构方程模型中的应用[J].心理科学进展, 2007(3): 567-576. BIAN R, CHE H S, YANG H. Item parceling strategies in structural equation modeling[J]. Advances in psychological science, 2007(3): 567-576. 本文引用 [1]

[17]	ANDERSON J C, GERBING D W. Structural Equation Modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach[J]. Psychological bulletin, 1988, 103(3): 411-423. 本文引用 [2]

[18]	王阳, 温忠麟, 李伟, 等. 新世纪20年国内结构方程模型方法研究与模型发展[J].心理科学进展, 2022, 30(8): 1715-1733. WANG Y, WEN Z L, LI W, et al. Methodological research and model development on structural equation models in China's mainland from 2001 to 2020[J]. Advances in psychological science, 2022, 30(8): 1715-1733. 本文引用 [1]

[19]	秦浩, 陈景武. 结构方程模型原理及其应用注意事项[J]. 中国卫生统计, 2006(4): 367-369. QIN H, CHEN J W. Principles of structural equation modeling and considerations for its application[J]. Chinese journal of health statistics, 2006(4): 367-369. 本文引用 [1]

[20]	骆雷. PLS-SEM多变量统计分析在赛事观众研究领域中的应用[J].上海体育学院学报, 2020, 44(11): 86-94. LUO L. Application of PLS-SEM multivariate data analysis on sports spectators research[J]. Journal of Shanghai University of Sport, 2020, 44(11): 86-94. 本文引用 [1]

[21]	王孟成, 邓俏文, 毕向阳. 潜变量建模的贝叶斯方法[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(10): 1682-1695. WANG M C, DENG Q W, BI X Y. Bayesian approach to latent variable modeling[J]. Advances in psychological science, 2017, 25(10): 1682-1695. 本文引用 [1]

[22]	LI C H. Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares[J]. Behavior research methods, 2016, 48(3): 936-949. 本文引用 [1]

[23]	MARSH H W, K-T HAU, GRAYSON D. Goodness of fit evaluation in structural equation models[M]// Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2005: 275-340. 本文引用 [1]

[24]	SAWY O A EL, MALHOTRA A, PARK Y, et al. Seeking the configurations of digital ecodynamics: it takes three to tango[J]. Information systems research, 2010, 21(4): 835-848. 本文引用 [1]

[25]	RAGIN C C. Redesigning social inquiry: fuzzy sets and beyond[J]. Social forces, 2009, 88(4): 1936-1938. 本文引用 [4]

[26]	SCHNEIDER C Q, WAGEMANN C. Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences: a guide to qualitative comparative analysis[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. 本文引用 [2]

[27]	BELL R G, FILATOTCHEV I, AGUILERA R. Corporate governance and investors' perceptions of foreign IPO value: an institutional perspective[J]. Journal of academy management, 2014, 57(1): 301-320. 本文引用 [1]

[28]	PAPPAS I O, KOUROUTHANASSIS P E, GIANNAKOS M N, et al. Explaining online shopping behavior with fsQCA: the role of cognitive and affective perceptions[J]. Journal of business research, 2016, 69(2): 794-803. 本文引用 [1]

[29]	SKAANING S E. Assessing the robustness of crisp-set and fuzzy-set QCA results[J]. Sociological methods & research, 2011, 40(2): 391-408. 本文引用 [1]

[30]	PARK Y, SAWY EL O A, FISS P C. The role of business intelligence and communication technologies in organizational agility: a configurational approach[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 2017, 18(9): 648-686. 本文引用 [1]

[31]	黄嫚丽, 张明, 皮圣雷, 等. 中国企业逆向跨国并购整合组态与并购整合绩效关系研究[J]. 管理学报, 2019, 16(5): 656-664. HUANG M L, ZHANG M, PI S L, et al. Research on the association between the integrative configuration of upstream cross-border M&A and performance[J]. Chinese journal of management, 2019, 16(5): 656-664. 本文引用 [1]

[32]

张明, 陈伟宏, 蓝海林. 中国企业“凭什么”完全并购境外高新技术企业——基于94个案例的模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA)[J]. 工业经济, 2019(4): 117-135.

ZHANG

, CHEN

H W

, LAN

H L

. Why do Chinese enterprises completely acquire foreign high-tech enterprises——a fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) based on 94 cases[J]. China industrial economics, 2019(4): 117-135.

本文引用 [1]

[33]	KIM M. Many roads lead to Rome: implications of geographic scope as a source of isolating mechanisms[J]. Journal of international business studies, 2013, 44(9): 898-921. 本文引用 [1]

[34]	刘军, 富萍萍. 结构方程模型应用陷阱分析[J]. 数理统计与管理, 2007(02): 268-272. LIU J, FU P P. Structural equation modeling applies trap analysis[J]. Journal of applied statistics and management, 2007(2): 268-272. 本文引用 [1]

[35]	BAGOZZI R P, YI Y. On the evaluation of structural equation models[J]. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 1988, 16(1): 74-94. 本文引用 [1]

[36]	FORNELL C, LARCKER D F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error[J]. Journal of marketing research, 1981, 18(1): 39. 本文引用 [1]

[37]	JACOBS S, CAMBRE B. Designers' road(s) to success: balancing exploration and exploitation[J]. Journal of business research, 2020, 115:241-249. 本文引用 [1]

[38]	PAPPAS I O, KOUROUTHANASSIS P E, GIANNAKOS M N, et al. Explaining online shopping behavior with fsQCA: the role of cognitive and affective perceptions[J]. Journal of business research, 2016, 69(2): 794-803. 本文引用 [1]

[39]	MIKALEFP, PATELI A. Information technology-enabled dynamic capabilities and their indirect effect on competitive performance: findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA[J]. Journal of business research, 2017, 70:1-16. 本文引用 [1]

[40]	PAPAMITSIOU Z, PAPPAS I O, SHARMA K, et al. Utilizing multimodal data through fsQCA to explain engagement in adaptive learning[J]. IEEE transactions on learning technologies, 2020, 13(4): 689-703. 本文引用 [1]

[41]	陈晓宇, 付少雄, 邓胜利. 社会化问答用户信息搜寻的影响因素研究——一种混合方法的视角[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018, 62(20): 102-111. CHEN X Y, FU S X, DENG S L. Analyzing the influencing factors of internet users' information-seeking behavior: a mixed-method perspective[J]. Library and information service, 2018, 62(20): 102-111. 本文引用 [1]

[42]

段尧清, 朱永迪, 蔡启宾, 等. 突发公共卫生事件下公众持续使用政府信息行为影响因素研究——基于QCA的触发路径及演化分析[J]. 信息资源管理学报, 2022, 12(3): 89-99.

DUAN

Y Q

, ZHU

Y D

, CAI

Q B

, et al. Research on influencing factors of government information public sustainable use behavior under public health emergency: trigger path and evolution analysis based on QCA[J]. Journal of information resources management, 2022, 12(3): 89-99.

本文引用 [1]

[43]	余贝迪, 王益明. 在线健康信息搜寻中健康焦虑增加现象研究[J]. 图书情报知识, 2020(4): 106-118. YU B D, WANG Y M. Research on the escalation of health anxiety in online health information seeking[J]. Documentation, information & knowledge, 2020(4): 106-118. 本文引用 [1]

[44]	LIU Y, MEZEI J, KOSTAKOS V, et al. Applying configurational analysis to IS behavioural research: a methodological alternative for modelling combinatorial complexities[J]. Information systems journal, 2015, 91 (11): 139-144. 本文引用 [1]

[45]

孙国强, 石文萍. 大学校园微信用户非理性集群行为生成路径研究——基于清晰集的定性比较分析[J].情报科学, 2017, 35(5): 150-156.

SUN

G Q

, SHI

W P

. University campus irrational cluster behavior generated path analysis among WeChat users——based on the qualitative comparison analysis of clear sets[J]. Information science, 2017, 35(5): 150-156.

本文引用 [1]

[46]	杨金龙, 胡广伟. 移动学习社区中用户感知学习效果的组态动因及提升策略研究[J]. 现代情报, 2020, 40(8): 71-81. YANG J Q, HU G W. Research on configuration motivation and promotion strategies of user perceived learning performance in mobile learning community[J]. Journal of modern information, 2020, 40(8): 71-81. 本文引用 [1]

[47]	胡媛, 王倩妮. 高校学生科研数据需求管理的影响因素探究——基于模糊集定性比较方法[J]. 现代情报, 2020, 40(10): 104-112. HU Y, WANG Q N. Research on the influencing factors of scientific data demand management of university student——based on fsQCA method[J]. Journal of modern information, 2020, 40(10): 104-112. 本文引用 [1]

[48]	杨金龙, 胡广伟. 移动学习采纳转化为持续的动因及其组态效应研究[J]. 情报科学, 2019, 37(7): 125-132. YANG J L, HU G W. Configuration effect of mobile learning adoption-continuance conversion motivation[J]. Information science, 2019, 37(7): 125-132. 本文引用 [1]

[49]	张海超, 张伶聪. 城市书房建设的影响因素和路径优化——基于郑州市郑品书舍的清晰集定性比较分析[J]. 国家图书馆学刊, 2022, 31(2): 48-59. ZHANG H C, YANG L C. Influencing factors and path optimization of city study construction ——a csQCA based on Zhengzhou Zhengpin Study[J]. Journal of the National Library of China, 2022, 31(2): 48-59. 本文引用 [1]

[50]	李少惠, 张玉强. 公共文化服务创新驱动机制研究——基于模糊集的定性比较分析[J]. 国家图书馆学刊, 2021, 30(2): 22-33. LI S H, ZHANG Y Q. Research on driving mechanism of public cultural service innovation ——qualitative comparative analysis based on fuzzy set[J]. Journal of the National Library of China, 2021, 30(2): 22-33. 本文引用 [1]

[51]

池毛毛, 杜运周, 王伟军. 组态视角与定性比较分析方法：图书情报学实证研究的新道路[J]. 情报学报, 2021, 40(4): 424-434.

CHI

M M

, DU

Y Z

, WANG

W J

. Configurational perspective and qualitative comparative analysis: the new way of empirical research in library and information science[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2021, 40(4): 424-434.

本文引用 [2]

[52]	武海东. 用结构方程模型构建图书馆读者满意度评价指标体系[J]. 情报科学, 2011, 29(2): 227-230. WU H D. The structural equation model was used to construct the evaluation index system of library user satisfaction[J]. Information science, 2011, 29(2): 227-230. 本文引用 [1]

[53]	黄宜, 董毅明, 王艳伟. 基于结构方程模型的高校图书馆读者满意度评价研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2008(8): 155-157. HUANG Y, DONG Y M, WANG Y W. Research on reader satisfaction evaluation of university library based on structural equation model[J]. Journal of intelligence, 2008(8): 155-157.

[54]	雷顺利. 基于用户满意度的高校图书馆馆藏资源评价模型构建[J]. 情报科学, 2010, 28(1): 76-80. LEI S L. Construction of a model of university library resources evaluation based on user satisfaction[J]. Information science, 2010, 28(1): 76-80.

[55]	张新兴, 杨志刚. 高校图书馆数据库用户满意指数模型——假设与检验[J]. 图书情报工作, 2010, 54(3): 76-80. ZHANG X X, YANG Z G. University library database user satisfaction index model: assumption and validation[J]. Library and information service, 2010, 54(3): 76-80.

[56]	刘锦源. 价值重于满意:图书馆服务质量模型的验证与启示[J]. 图书情报知识, 2010(6): 50-55. LIU J Y. Value overweight satisfaction: the validation of library service quality model and its implications[J]. Documentation, information & knowledge, 2010(6): 50-55.

[57]	关磊. 高校数字图书馆网站用户持续使用意愿研究——基于用户体验、TAM和ECM的整合模型[J]. 图书馆工作与研究, 2020(2): 48-59. GUAN L. Research on users' continuance use intention of academic library website——based on integration model of user experience, TAM and ECM[J]. Library work and study, 2020(2): 48-59. 本文引用 [1]

[58]	龚花萍, 孙晓, 高洪新. 基于SEM的图书馆阅读文化建设的读者满意度评价研究[J]. 现代情报, 2014, 34(6): 23-28. GONG H P, SUN X, GAO H X. An evaluation research of readers' satisfaction for library reading culture building base on SEM[J]. Journal of modern information, 2014, 34(6): 23-28. 本文引用 [1]

[59]	杨涛. 基于SEM的图书馆自助服务用户满意和使用研究——以自助还书系统为例[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2015, 35(8): 99-107. YANG T. A study on library self- service user satisfaction and use based on SEM——the case of selfreturn system[J]. Library tribune, 2015, 35(8): 99-107. 本文引用 [1]

[60]	占南, 王文韬, 罗毅. 高校图书馆开放课程资源用户使用意愿分析——以武汉大学图书馆为例[J]. 图书馆杂志, 2015, 34(8): 21-28, 61. ZHAN N, WANG W T, LUO Y. Analysis on the usage intention of university library open course resources: taking Wuhan University Library as an example[J]. Library journal, 2015, 34(8): 21-28, 61. 本文引用 [1]

[61]	钱瑛. 在线学习用户持续使用行为的影响因素研究——基于社会化网络环境和学情定位视角[J]. 现代情报, 2015, 35(3): 50-56. QIAN Y. Factors affecting the continued use of online learning user behavior[J]. Journal of modern information, 2015, 35(3): 50-56. 本文引用 [1]

[62]	龚主杰, 赵文军, 熊曙初. 基于感知价值的虚拟社区成员持续知识共享意愿研究[J]. 图书与情报, 2013(5): 89-94. GONG Z J, ZHAO W J, XIONG S C. Research on knowledge-sharing continuance intention in virtual community based on perceived value[J]. Library & information, 2013(5): 89-94. 本文引用 [1]

[63]	李金阳. 社会交换理论视角下虚拟社区知识共享行为研究[J]. 情报科学, 2013, 31(4): 119-123. LI J Y. Study of knowledge sharing in virtual communities from the perspective of social exchange theory[J]. Information science, 2013, 31(4): 119-123.

[64]	尚永辉, 艾时钟, 王凤艳. 基于社会认知理论的虚拟社区成员知识共享行为实证研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2012, 29(7): 127-132. SHANG Y H, AI S Z, WANG F Y. Empirical study on knowledge sharing behavior of virtual community users based on social cognitive theory[J]. Science & technology progress and policy, 2012, 29(7): 127-132.

[65]	周涛, 刘佳怡, 邓胜利. 基于SOR模型的在线知识社区用户潜水行为研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2022, 41(7): 160-165, 83. ZHOU T, LIU J Y, DENG S L. A study on lurking behavior of online knowledge community users based on SOR model[J]. Journal of intelligence, 2022, 41(7): 160-165, 83. 本文引用 [1]

[66]	杜智涛, 徐敬宏. 从需求到体验:用户在线知识付费行为的影响因素[J]. 新闻与传播研究, 2018, 25(10): 18-39, 126. DU Z T, XU J H. From demand to experience: impact factors of users' online knowledge payment behavior[J]. Journalism & communication, 2018, 25(10): 18-39, 126. 本文引用 [1]

[67]	王文韬, 李晶, 张帅, 等. 信息系统成功视角下虚拟健康社区用户使用意愿研究[J]. 现代情报, 2018, 38(2): 29-35. WANG W T, LI J, ZHANG S, et al. Research on the users' intention of virtual health community from system success[J]. Journal of modern information, 2018, 38(2): 29-35. 本文引用 [1]

[68]	魏群义, 姚媛, 李艺亭. 微信图书馆用户使用意愿影响因素实证研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018, 62(5): 68-75. WEI Q Y, YAO Y, LI Y T. The empirical research on factors of WeChat library users' usage intentions[J]. Library and information service, 2018, 62(5): 68-75. 本文引用 [1]

[69]	徐恺英, 崔伟, 洪旭东, 等. 图书馆移动阅读用户接纳行为影响因素研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2017, 61(15): 43-50. XU K Y, CUI W, HONG X D, et al. An empirical study on the factors of library mobile reading users' acceptance behavior[J]. Library and information service, 2017, 61(15): 43-50. 本文引用 [1]

[70]	王哲. 社会化问答社区知乎的用户持续使用行为影响因素研究[J]. 情报科学, 2017, 35(1): 78-83, 143. WANG Z. Research on the influencing factors of user continuous use behavior of Zhihu, a social Q&A community[J]. Information science, 2017, 35(1): 78-83, 143. 本文引用 [1]

[71]	李武, 赵星. 大学生社会化阅读APP持续使用意愿及发生机理研究[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2016, 42(1): 52-65. LI W, ZHAO X. Understanding the continuance intention of social reading apps by college students[J]. Journal of library science in China, 2016, 42(1): 52-65. 本文引用 [1]

[72]

杜运周, 刘秋辰, 程建青. 什么样的营商环境生态产生城市高创业活跃度？——基于制度组态的分析[J].管理世界, 2020, 36(9): 141-155.

Y Z

, LIU

Q C

, CHENG

J Q

. What kind of business environment ecology produces high entrepreneurial activity in cities? analysis based on institutional configuration[J]. Journal of management world, 2020, 36(9): 141-155.

本文引用 [1]

[73]	VENKATESH V, BROWN S A. Longitudinal investigation of personal computers in homes: adoption determinants and emerging challenges[J]. MIS quarterly, 2001, 25(1): 71-102. 本文引用 [6]

[74]	GEFEN, D, KARAHANNA E, STRAUB D W. Trust and TAM in online shopping: an integrated model[J]. MIS quarterly, 2003, 27(1): 51-90. 本文引用 [1]

[75]	BHATTACHERJEE A. Understanding information systems continuance: an expectation-confirmation model[J]. MIS quarterly, 2001, 25(3): 351-370. 本文引用 [2]

[76]	杨思洛, 于永浩, 郑梦雪. 中国人文社科成果的国际影响力研究[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2022. YANG S L, YU Y H, ZHENG M X. Research on the international influence of China's humanities and social sciences achievements[M]. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press, 2022. 本文引用 [1]