用户感知视角下人格匹配对社会支持聊天机器人亲密感的影响研究

陈静, 易方兴

知识管理论坛 ›› 2025, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (1) : 46-63.

PDF(1440 KB)
PDF(1440 KB)
知识管理论坛 ›› 2025, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (1) : 46-63. DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.2095-5472.2025.004  CSTR: 32306.14.CN11-6036.2025.004
研究论文

用户感知视角下人格匹配对社会支持聊天机器人亲密感的影响研究

作者信息 +

Study on the Impact of Personality Matching on Intimacy of Social Support Chatbots from the Perspective of User Perception

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

[目的/意义] 探究社会支持情境下,用户与聊天机器人在能动与共生维度的感知人格匹配对亲密感的影响,为提升社会支持聊天机器人的服务质量与用户体验提供理论依据和实践指引。[方法/过程] 基于用户感知视角和社会交换理论,开展情景实验获取人格及用户体验数据,采用多项式回归与响应面分析方法探究用户能动人格与感知能力、共生人格与感知温暖的匹配对用户亲密感的影响机制。[结果/结论] 在不同维度的不同匹配类型下,用户人格与聊天机器人感知人格的不同组合方式对用户自我表露意愿的影响存在显著差异;用户对聊天机器人的感知能力与感知温暖是影响用户自我表露意愿的关键因素;用户自我表露意愿在人智感知人格匹配与亲密感的关系中发挥中介作用。研究揭示人格匹配对人智交互用户体验的影响实质,证实自我表露意愿在人机关系建立与发展中的重要作用,为社会支持聊天机器人的设计方案提供指导建议。

Abstract

[Purpose/Significance] Exploring the impact of perceived personality matching between users and chatbots in the dimensions of agency and communion on intimacy in the context of social support, providing theoretical basis and practical guidance for improving the service quality and user experience of social support chatbots. [Method/Process] Based on the user perception perspective and social exchange theory, scenario experiments were conducted to obtain personality and user experience data. Polynomial regression and response surface analysis methods were used to explore the impact mechanism of matching agency personality and perceived competence, communion personality and perceived warmth on user intimacy. [Result/Conclusion] There are significant differences in the impact of different combinations of user personality and chatbot perceived personality on users' self-disclosure willingness under different matching types in various dimensions; User’s perceived competence and warmth of chatbots are key factors affecting their self-disclosure; Users’ self-disclosure plays a mediating role in the relationship between perceived personality matching and intimacy. This study reveals the essence of the impact of personality matching on the user experience of human-AI interaction, confirms the important role of self-disclosure in the establishment and development of human-AI relationships, and provides guidance and suggestions for the design of social support chatbots.

关键词

人智交互 / 社会支持 / 人格匹配 / 自我表露 / 亲密感

Key words

human-AI interaction / social support / personality match / self-disclosure / intimacy

引用本文

导出引用
陈静 , 易方兴. 用户感知视角下人格匹配对社会支持聊天机器人亲密感的影响研究[J]. 知识管理论坛. 2025, 10(1): 46-63 https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.2095-5472.2025.004
Chen Jing , Yi Fangxing. Study on the Impact of Personality Matching on Intimacy of Social Support Chatbots from the Perspective of User Perception[J]. Knowledge Management Forum. 2025, 10(1): 46-63 https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.2095-5472.2025.004
中图分类号: G252.7   

参考文献

[1]
MOILANEN J, VAN BERKEL N, VISURI A, et al. Supporting mental health self-care discovery through a chatbot[J]. Frontiers in digital health, 2023, 5: 1034724.
[2]
JAUREGUI VELANDE R, ANDRADE ARENAS L, ALFARO PEÑA G B, et al. Mobile APP prototype: telemedicine for mental health care during pandemic[J]. International journal of online and biomedical engineering, 2023, 19(1): 155-177.
[3]
COBB S. Social support as a moderator of life stress[J]. Psychosomatic medicine, 1976, 38(5), 300-314.
[4]
COHEN S. Social relationships and health[J]. American psychologist, 2004, 59(8): 676-684.
[5]
RHEU M, DAI Y, MENG J, et al. When a chatbot disappoints you: expectancy violation in human-chatbot interaction in a social support context[J]. Communication research, 2024, 51(7): 782-814.
[6]
BRANDTZAEG P B, FØLSTAD A. Why people use chatbots[C]//4th International Conference on Internet Science. Thessaloniki: Springer, 2017: 377-392.
[7]
PAL D, VANIJJA V, THAPLIYAL H, et al. What affects the usage of artificial conversational agents? an agent personality and love theory perspective[J]. Computers in human behavior, 2023, 145: 107788.
[8]
JIANG L C, BAZAROVA N N, HANCOCK J T. The disclosure-intimacy link in computer-mediated communication: an attributional extension of the hyperpersonal model[J]. Human communication research, 2011, 37(1): 58-77.
[9]
LUCAS G M, RIZZO A, GRATCH J, et al. Reporting mental health symptoms: breaking down barriers to care with virtual human interviewers[J]. Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2017, 4: 51.
[10]
武雪姣,李彬彬,刘灵芝,等.大学生人际交往与人格特质[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2014,22(2):283-284.(WU X J, LI B B, LIU L Z, et al. College students' interpersonal communication and personality traits[J]. China journal of health psychology, 2014, 22(2): 283-284.)
[11]
MATTHEWS G, DEARY I J, WHITEMAN M C. Personality traits[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
[12]
NASS C, STEUER J, TAUBER E R. Computers are social actors[C]//Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. Boston: ACM,1994: 72-78.
[13]
REEVES B, NASS C. The media equation: how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people[J]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996, 10(10): 19-36.
[14]
YU L, FAN X. Lonely human and dominant robot: similarity versus complementary attraction[J]. Psychology & marketing, 2024, 41(5): 1133-1151.
[15]
SHUMANOV M, JOHNSON L. Making conversations with chatbots more personalized[J]. Computers in human behavior, 2021, 117: 106627.
[16]
GNEWUCH U, YU M, MAEDCHE A. The effect of perceived similarity in dominance on customer self-disclosure to chatbots in conversational commerce[C]//28th European conference on information systems. Marrakech: Association for Information Systems (AIS), 2020.
[17]
LEE K M, PENG W, JIN S A, et al. Can robots manifest personality? an empirical test of personality recognition, social responses, and social presence in human-robot interaction[J]. Journal of communication, 2006, 56(4): 754-772.
[18]
HOMANS G C. Social behavior as exchange[J]. American journal of sociology, 1958, 63(6): 597-606.
[19]
马中红,吴熙倡.社交聊天机器人的性别偏见——基于小冰系列的对话测试研究[J].国际新闻界,2024,46(4):72-89.(MA Z H,WU X C. Gender bias in social chatbots: a conversation test study based on Xiaoice series of chatbots[J]. Chinese journal of journalism & communication, 2024, 46(4): 72-89.)
[20]
SHUM H Y, HE X, LI D. From Eliza to XiaoIce: challenges and opportunities with social chatbots[J]. Frontiers of information technology & electronic engineering, 2018, 19(1): 10-26.
[21]
KÖRNER R, ALTMANN T. Personality is related to satisfaction in friendship dyads, but similarity is not: understanding the links between the big five and friendship satisfaction using actor-partner interdependence models[J]. Journal of research in personality, 2023, 107: 104436.
[22]
WIGGINS J S. A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms: the interpersonal domain[J]. Journal of personality and social psychology, 1979, 37(3): 395–412.
[23]
KIESLER D J. The 1982 interpersonal circle: a taxonomy for complementarity in human transactions[J]. Psychological review, 1983, 90(3): 185–214.
[24]
ABELE A E, WOJCISZKE B. Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others[J]. Journal of personality and social psychology, 2007, 93(5): 751-763.
[25]
张妍,赵宇翔,吴大伟,等.人智交互情境中用户对生成式人工智能的心智感知及反应研究[J].情报理论与实践,2024,47(8):140-149.(ZHANG Y, ZHAO Y X, WU D W, et al. Study of users' mind perceptions and responses to generative AI in human-AI interaction context[J]. Information studies: theory & application,2024,47(8):140-149.)
[26]
HARRIS-WATSON A M, LARSON L E, LAUHARATANAIRUN N, et al. Social perception in human-AI teams: warmth and competence predict receptivity to AI teammates[J]. Computers in human behavior, 2023, 145: 107765.
[27]
DIGMAN J M. Higher-order factors of the Big Five[J]. Journal of personality and social psychology, 1997, 73(6): 1246-1256.
[28]
JIN S V, YOUN S. Why do consumers with social phobia prefer anthropomorphic customer service chatbots? Evolutionary explanations of the moderating roles of social phobia[J]. Telematics and informatics, 2021, 62: 101644.
[29]
ESTERWOOD C, ROBERT L P. Personality in healthcare human robot interaction (h-hri) a literature review and brief critique[C]//Proceedings of the 8th international conference on human-agent interaction. Sydney, Australia: ACM, 2020: 87-95.
[30]
EDWARDS J R, CABLE D M. The value of value congruence[J]. Journal of applied psychology, 2009, 94(3): 654-677.
[31]
LIN N, ENSEL W M, SIMEONE R S, et al. Social support, stressful life events, and illness: a model and an empirical test[J]. Journal of health and social behavior, 1979, 20(2): 108-108.
[32]
BAE BRANDTZÆG P B, SKJUVE M, KRISTOFFER DYSTHE K K, et al. When the social becomes non-human: young people's perception of social support in chatbots[C]//Proceedings of the 2021 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. Yokohama, Japan: ACM, 2021: 1-13.
[33]
曹博林,黄诗怡.人机互动中的自我表露与隐私计算动态关系研究[J].全球传媒学刊,2023,10(3):22-46.(CAO B L, HUANG S Y. The dynamic relationship between self-disclosure and private computing in human-machine communication[J]. Global journal of media Studies,2023,10(3):22-46.)
[34]
LEE J, LEE D. User perception and self-disclosure towards an AI psychotherapy chatbot according to the anthropomorphism of its profile picture[J]. Telematics and informatics, 2023, 85: 102052.
[35]
ALTMAN I. Social penetration: the development of interpersonal relationships[M]. Holt: Rinehart & Winston, 1973.
[36]
PARK G, CHUNG J, LEE S. Effect of AI chatbot emotional disclosure on user satisfaction and reuse intention for mental health counseling: a serial mediation model[J]. Current psychology, 2023, 42(32): 28663-28673.
[37]
LIU W, XU K, YAO M Z. “Can you tell me about yourself?” the impacts of chatbot names and communication contexts on users' willingness to self-disclose information in human-machine conversations[J]. Communication research reports, 2023, 40(3): 122-133.
[38]
ADAM M, BENLIAN A. From web forms to chatbots: the roles of consistency and reciprocity for user information disclosure[J]. Information systems journal, 2024, 34(4): 1175-1216.
[39]
NOGUCHI Y, KAMIDE H, TANAKA F. Personality traits for a social mediator robot encouraging elderly self-disclosure on loss experiences[J]. ACM transactions on human-robot interaction, 2020, 9(3): 1-24.
[40]
GRAHAM S A, LEE E E, JESTE D V, et al. Artificial intelligence approaches to predicting and detecting cognitive decline in older adults: a conceptual review[J]. Psychiatry research, 2020, 284: 112732.
[41]
BAKAN D. The duality of human existence: an essay on psychology and religion[M]. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1966.
[42]
GEBAUER J E, PAULHUS D L, NEBERICH W. Big two personality and religiosity across cultures: communals as religious conformists and agentics as religious contrarians[J]. Social psychological and personality science, 2013, 4(1): 21-30.
[43]
CHENG X, ZHANG X, COHEN J, et al. Human vs. AI: understanding the impact of anthropomorphism on consumer response to chatbots from the perspective of trust and relationship norms[J]. Information processing & management, 2022, 59(3): 102940.
[44]
WORTHY M, GARY A L, KAHN G M. Self-disclosure as an exchange process[J]. Journal of personality and social psychology, 1969, 13(1): 59-63.
[45]
范哲,刘奔.用户人格特质对虚拟社区信息分享行为的影响研究——以基本心理需要为中介变量[J].现代情报,2019,39(11):69-79,97.(FAN Z, LIU B. The effect of personality traits on information sharing in the virtue community: based on basic psychological needs as intermediaries[J]. Journal of modern information,2019,39(11):69-79,97.)
[46]
LIU Z, MIN Q, ZHAI Q, et al. Self-disclosure in Chinese micro-blogging: a social exchange theory perspective[J]. Information & management, 2016, 53(1): 53-63.
[47]
王琼,蔡子君,钱婧.主动性人格会影响组织越轨行为吗——基于社会交换理论的研究[J].经济管理,2021,43(8):124-140.(WANG Q, CAI Z J, QIAN J. Would proactive personality influence deviance behavior? A social exchange perspective[J]. Business and management journal,2021,43(8):124-140.)
[48]
GRANT A M, GINO F, HOFFMANN D A. Reversing the extraverted leadership advantage: the role of employee proactivity[J]. Academy of management journal, 2011, 54(3): 528-550.
[49]
孟韬,陈梦圆,张天锴,等.交互失误情境下交互式人工智能拟人化的负面影响——基于ChatGPT和搜索引擎的实验证据[J].情报理论与实践,2024,47(1):84-91.(MENG T, CHEN M Y, ZHANG T K, et al. The negative impact of interactive AI anthropomorphization in interaction failure contexts: experimental evidence based on ChatGPT and search engines[J]. Information studies: theory & application,2024,47(1):84-91.)
[50]
吴继飞,朱翊敏,刘颖悦,等.智能客服厌恶效应的诱因、心理机制与边界研究[J].南开管理评论,2023,26(6):179-191.(WU J F, ZHU Y M, LIU Y Y, et al. Aversion effect for AI chatbot: inducing factor, psychological mechanism and boundary conditions[J]. Nankai business review,2023,26(6):179-191.)
[51]
SHUQAIR S, PINTO D C, SO K K F, et al. A pathway to consumer forgiveness in the sharing economy: the role of relationship norms[J]. International journal of hospitality management, 2021, 98: 103041.
[52]
EPLEY N, WAYTZ A, CACIOPPO J T. On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism[J]. Psychological review, 2007, 114(4): 864–886.
[53]
LUDWIG V U, BERRY B, CAI J Y, et al. The impact of disclosing emotions on ratings of interpersonal closeness, warmth, competence, and leadership ability[J]. Frontiers in psychology, 2022, 13: 989826.
[54]
COZBY P C. Self-disclosure: a literature review[J]. Psychological bulletin, 1973, 79(2): 73-91.
[55]
WHEELESS L R. Self-disclosure and interpersonal solidarity: measurement, validation, and relationships[J]. Human communication research, 1976, 3(1): 47-61.
[56]
LEE Y C, YAMASHITA N, HUANG Y, et al. " I hear you, I feel you": encouraging deep self-disclosure through a chatbot[C]//Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. Honolulu: ACM, 2020: 1-12.
[57]
SKJUVE M, FØLSTAD A, FOSTERVOLD K I, et al. My chatbot companion-a study of human-chatbot relationships[J]. International journal of human-computer studies, 2021, 149: 102601.
[58]
BANDURA A. Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory[M]. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1986.
[59]
CARSON R C. Interaction concepts of personality[M]. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company, 1969.
[60]
HOROWITZ L M, STRACK S. Handbook of interpersonal psychology: theory, research, assessment, and therapeutic interventions[M]. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2012.
[61]
TRACEY T J. An examination of the complementarity of interpersonal behavior[J]. Journal of personality and social psychology, 1994, 67(5): 864-878
[62]
GLOMB T M, WELSH E T. Can opposites attract? personality heterogeneity in supervisor-subordinate dyads as a predictor of subordinate outcomes[J]. Journal of applied psychology, 2005, 90(4): 749-757.
[63]
蔡地,许瑞冰,刘佳,等.上下级主动性人格匹配对员工工作幸福感的影响及其作用机制[J].外国经济与管理,2020,42(1):85-98.(CAI D, XU R B, LIU J, et al. The influence and mechanism of person-supervisor proactive personality fit on employees' workplace well-being[J]. Foreign economics & management,2020,42(1):85-98.)
[64]
JIANG L C, BAZAROVA N N, HANCOCK J T. The disclosure-intimacy link in computer-mediated communication: an attributional extension of the hyperpersonal model[J]. Human communication research, 2011, 37(1): 58-77.
[65]
PENNER A, EYSSEL F. Germ-free robotic friends: loneliness during the COVID-19 pandemic enhanced the willingness to self-disclose towards robots[J]. Robotics, 2022, 11(6): 121.
[66]
傅小兰,张侃,陈雪峰,等.心理健康蓝皮书:中国国民心理健康发展报告(2021—2022)[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2023.(FU X L, ZHANG K, CHEN X F, et al. Blue book of mental health:report on national mental health development in China(2021-2022)[M]. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press,2023.)
[67]
THU-CoAI.【新发布】Emohaa 共情陪伴大模型[EB/OL].[2025-01-15]. https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/687238598.htm.(THU-CoAI.【New Release】Emohaa Empathy Companionship Model[EB/OL].[2025-01-15]. https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/687238598.htm.)
[68]
SABOUR S, ZHANG W, XIAO X, et al. A chatbot for mental health support: exploring the impact of Emohaa on reducing mental distress in China[J]. Frontiers in digital health, 2023, 5: 1133987.
[69]
GEBAUER J E, SEDKIDES C, LÜDTKE O, et al. Agency-communion and interest in prosocial behavior: social motives for assimilation and contrast explain sociocultural inconsistencies[J]. Journal of personality, 2014, 82(5): 452-466.
[70]
PHAM H C, DUONG C D, NGUYEN G K H. What drives tourists’ continuance intention to use ChatGPT for travel services? A stimulus-organism-response perspective[J]. Journal of retailing and consumer services, 2024, 78: 103758.
[71]
LYVERS M, CUTINHO D, THORBERG F A. Alexithymia, impulsivity, disordered social media use, mood and alcohol use in relation to Facebook self-disclosure[J]. Computers in human behavior, 2020, 103: 174-180.
[72]
FU Q, RODRÍGUEZ-ARDURA I, MESEGUER-ARTOLA A, et al. Self-disclosure during the COVID-19 emergency: effects of narcissism traits, time perspective, virtual presence, and hedonic gratification[J]. Computers in human behavior, 2022, 130: 107154.
[73]
SONG X, XU B, ZHAO Z. Can people experience romantic love for artificial intelligence? an empirical study of intelligent assistants[J]. Information & management, 2022, 59(2): 103595.
[74]
LEE I, HAHN S. On the relationship between mind perception and social support of chatbots[J]. Frontiers in psychology, 2024, 15: 1282036.
[75]
DECI E L, CONNELL J P, RYAN R M. Self-determination in a work organization[J]. Journal of applied psychology, 1989, 74(4): 580-590.
[76]
CHENG Z, FAN W, SHAO B, et al. The impact of intelligent customer service agents’ initial response on consumers’ continuous interaction intention[J]. Journal of retailing and consumer services, 2024, 76: 103585.
[77]
YU S, ZHAO L. Emojifying chatbot interactions: an exploration of emoji utilization in human-chatbot communications[J]. Telematics and informatics, 2024, 86: 102071.
[78]
CAI N, GAO S, YAN J. How the communication style of chatbots influences consumers’ satisfaction, trust, and engagement in the context of service failure[J]. Humanities and social sciences communications, 2024, 11(1): 1-11.
[79]
MAAR D, BESSON E, KEFI H. Fostering positive customer attitudes and usage intentions for scheduling services via chatbots[J]. Journal of service management, 2023, 34(2): 208-230.
[80]
JIN E, EASTIN M. Gender bias in virtual doctor interactions: gender matching effects of chatbots and users on communication satisfactions and future intentions to use the chatbot[J]. International journal of human-computer interaction, 2024,40(23): 8246-8258.
[81]
ADAM M, BENLIAN A. From web forms to chatbots: the roles of consistency and reciprocity for user information disclosure[J]. Information systems journal, 2024, 34(4): 1175-1216.
[82]
ACQUISTI A, BRANDIMARTE L, LOEWENSTEIN G. Privacy and human behavior in the age of information[J]. Science, 2015, 347(6221): 509-514.

作者贡献说明/Author contributions:

陈 静:提出研究思路,修改研究框架,修订论文内容;

易方兴:设计并进行实验,采集与分析数据,撰写与修订论文。

基金

中央高校基本科研业务费“生成式人工智能与人脑协同机理研究”(CCNUJCPT2024003701)

PDF(1440 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/