PDF(2320 KB)
PDF(2320 KB)
PDF(2320 KB)
人工智能警觉机制：作者身份对数字绘画作品感知的影响
The Vigilance Mechanism toward AI: The Impact of Authorship on the Perception of Digital Painting
[目的/意义] 人智共创的数字绘画在数字人文艺术作品中已十分普遍，然而作者身份对人智共创的数字人文作品感知的影响尚不明确。探索作者身份对数字绘画感知的影响及文化的调节作用，以揭示人工智能生成内容的使用反馈，为人智共创研究提供方向。[方法/过程] 采取4（作者身份：人/AI/人主导的人智共创/AI主导的人智共创）×2（文化背景：本土/非本土）两因素混合实验设计。两组被试共48人，观看4幅不同作者身份的同类数字绘画作品，从感知质量、空间存在感、感知想象力和同理心等维度用量表度量其对作品的感知。[结果/结论] 结果显示，在对数字绘画作品的抽象属性（感知想象力与同理心）感知维度上，被试对人工智能表现出警觉机制，且在同理心上的警觉明显强于在感知想象力上的警觉。此外，文化背景在作者身份对数字绘画作品的同理心影响上发挥了调节作用。
[Purpose/Significance] The human-AI co-creation of digital painting is prevalent in digital humanistic art works, yet the impact of authorship on the perception of digital humanistic works co-created by human and AI remains unclear. This study aims to investigate the influence of authorship on the perception of digital painting and the regulating role of culture, in order to reveal feedback on the use of AI-generated content, providing direction for human-AI co-creative research. [Method/Process] The study employed a mixed experimental design: 4 (authorship: human/AI/human-led co-creation/AI-led co-creation) × 2 (cultural background: native/non-native). Forty-eight participants were divided into two groups and viewed four digital painting works of the same genre but with different authorship origins. Their perceptions of the works were assessed using scales that measured perceived quality, spatial presence, perceived imaginativeness and empathy. [Result/Conclusion] The study reveals participants demonstrated a vigilance mechanism towards AI when perceiving the abstract attributes (perceived imaginativeness and empathy) of digital paintings, with a more pronounced presence in empathy than in perceived imaginativeness. Furthermore, culture plays a regulating role in the impact of authorship on empathy of digital painting.
human-AI co-creation / authorship / perception / digital humanities
| [1] |
韩秀.社交机器人的“人格”测量——一项基于艾森克问卷的探索性研究[J].青年记者,2021(18):45-46. (HAN X. “Personality” measurement of social robots: an exploratory study based on the Eysenck questionnaire[J]. Youth journalist, 2021(18):45-46.)
|
| [2] |
梅琼林,张晓.“媒体等同”——从效果研究到理论建构[J].社会科学研究,2006(5):193-196. (MEI Q L, ZHANG X. “Media Equivalence”: from effect research to theoretical construction[J]. Social science research, 2006(5):193-196)
|
| [3] |
张卓,吴占勇.虚拟现实新闻的伦理反思——基于技术与媒介的双重视角[J].湖北社会科学,2017(12):193-198. (ZHANG Z, WU Z Y. Ethical reflection on virtual reality news: based on the dual perspective of technology and media[J]. Hubei social sciences, 2017(12):193-198)
|
| [4] |
张进澳,卢新元,孙冰悦,等.人智协同知识创新机制的建模与仿真——基于模拟实验的系统动力学分析[J].情报理论与实践,2024,47(12):143-153,96. (ZHANG J A, LU X Y, SUN B Y, et al. Modeling and simulation of human-AI collaborative knowledge innovation mechanism: system dynamics analysis based on simulation experiment[J]. Information studies: theory & application, 2024,47(12):143-153,96.)
|
| [5] |
姚琦,周赟.主观还是客观: AI写作对新闻可信度的影响机制研究[J].现代传播(中国传媒大学学报),2022,44(10):127-135,145. (YAO Q, ZHOU Y. Subjective or objective: research on the influence mechanism of AI writing on news credibility[J]. Modern communication (Journal of Communication University of China),2022,44(10):127-135,145.)
|
| [6] |
MORAVEC V, HYNEK N, SKARE M, et al. Human or machine? the perception of artificial intelligence in journalism, its socio-economic conditions, and technological developments toward the digital future[J]. Technological forecasting and social change, 2024,200: 123162.
|
| [7] |
HENESTROSA A L, GREVING H, KIMMERLE J. Automated journalism: the effects of AI authorship and evaluative information on the perception of a science journalism article[J]. Computers in human behavior, 2023, 138: 107445.
|
| [8] |
SHANK D B, STEFANIK C, STUHLSATZ C, et al. AI composer bias: listeners like music less when they think it was composed by an AI[J]. Journal of experimental psychology: applied, 2023, 29(3): 676-692.
|
| [9] |
ZLATKOV D, ENS J, PASQUIER P. Searching for human bias against AI-composed music[C]//International conference on computational intelligence in music, sound, art and design (part of EvoStar). Cham: Springer, 2023: 308-323.
|
| [10] |
DALLAS L, MORREALE F. Effects of added vocals and human production to AI-composed music on listener's appreciation[C]// Proceedings of the 2020 joint conference on AI music creativity. Auckland: ResearchSpace, 2020: 123-130.
|
| [11] |
DENG Z, YANG H, WANG J. Can AI write classical Chinese poetry like humans? an empirical study inspired by turing test[EB/OL]. [2025-02-20].https://arxiv.org/pdf/2401.04952.
|
| [12] |
HITSUWARI J, UEDA Y, YUN W, et al. Does human–AI collaboration lead to more creative art? aesthetic evaluation of human-made and AI-generated haiku poetry[J]. Computers in human behavior, 2023, 139: 107502.
|
| [13] |
KÖBIS N, MOSSINK L D. Artificial intelligence versus Maya Angelou: experimental evidence that people cannot differentiate AI-generated from human-written poetry[J]. Computers in human behavior, 2021, 114: 106553.
|
| [14] |
DAREWYCH T. The impact of authorship on aesthetic appreciation: a study comparing human and AI-generated artworks[J]. Art and society, 2023, 2(1): 67-73.
|
| [15] |
BELLAICHE L, SHAHI R, TURPIN M H, et al. Humans versus AI: whether and why we prefer human-created compared to AI-created artwork[J]. Cognitive research: principles and implications, 2023, 8(1): 42.
|
| [16] |
DI DIO C, ARDIZZI M, SCHIEPPATI S V, et al. Art made by artificial intelligence: the effect of authorship on aesthetic judgments[J]. Psychology of aesthetics, creativity, and the arts, 2023.
|
| [17] |
GU L, LI Y. Who made the paintings: artists or artificial intelligence? the effects of identity on liking and purchase intention[J]. Frontiers in psychology, 2022, 13: 941163.
|
| [18] |
TIGRE MOURA F, CASTRUCCI C, HINDLEY C. Artificial intelligence creates art? an experimental investigation of value and creativity perceptions[J]. The journal of creative behavior, 2023, 57(4): 534-549.
|
| [19] |
WÖLKER A, POWELL T E. Algorithms in the newsroom? News readers’ perceived credibility and selection of automated journalism[J]. Journalism, 2021, 22(1): 86-103.
|
| [20] |
TANDOC Jr E C, YAO L J, WU S. Man vs. machine? the impact of algorithm authorship on news credibility[J]. Digital journalism, 2020, 8(4): 548-562.
|
| [21] |
KUMAR S, RATNAVELU K. Perceptions of scholars in the field of economics on co-authorship associations: Evidence from an international survey[J]. Plos one, 2016, 11(6): e0157633.
|
| [22] |
HELGESSON G, ERIKSSON S. Authorship order[J]. Learned publishing, 2019, 32(2): 106-112.
|
| [23] |
DA SILVA A P A C, VANZ S A. Authorship, authorship order and author contribution: a literature review[J]. RDBCI: revista digital de biblioteconomia e ciencia da informacao, 2023, 20: e022028.
|
| [24] |
SHIN D, CHOTIYAPUTTA V, ZAID B. The effects of cultural dimensions on algorithmic news: how do cultural value orientations affect how people perceive algorithms?[J]. Computers in human behavior, 2022, 126: 107007.
|
| [25] |
KIM Y, LEE H. Towards a sustainable news business: understanding readers’ perceptions of algorithm-generated news based on cultural conditioning[J]. Sustainability, 2021, 13(7): 3728.
|
| [26] |
XU K, LIU F, MOU Y, et al. Using machine learning to learn machines: a cross-cultural study of users’ responses to machine-generated artworks[J]. Journal of broadcasting & electronic media, 2020, 64(4): 566-591.
|
| [27] |
WU Y, MOU Y, LI Z, et al. Investigating American and Chinese subjects’ explicit and implicit perceptions of AI-generated artistic work[J]. Computers in human behavior, 2020, 104: 106186.
|
| [28] |
JACKSON B S, LURIA S R, KAUFMAN J C. A mirror to the world: art, creativity, and racial bias[M]//PREISS D D, SINGER M, KAUFMAN J C. Creativity, innovation, and change across cultures. Cham: Springer, 2023: 297-313.
|
| [29] |
MASUDA T, GONZALEZ R, KWAN L, et al. Culture and aesthetic preference: comparing the attention to context of East Asians and Americans[J]. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 2008, 34(9): 1260-1275.
|
| [30] |
DARDA K M, CHATTERJEE A. Crosscultural aesthetics: can aesthetic contextualism overcome the ingroup bias? [EB/OL]. [2025-02-20]. https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/g2u6x/download.
|
| [31] |
DARDA K M, CHRISTENSEN A P, CHATTERJEE A. Does the frame of an artwork matter? cultural framing and aesthetic judgments for abstract and representational art[J]. Psychology of aesthetics, creativity, and the arts, 2023, 17(4): 428-450.
|
| [32] |
DARDA K M, CROSS E S. The role of expertise and culture in visual art appreciation[J]. Scientific reports, 2022, 12(1): 10666.
|
| [33] |
BAO Y, YANG T, LIN X, et al. Aesthetic preferences for Eastern and Western traditional visual art: identity matters[J]. Frontiers in psychology, 2016, 7: 1596.
|
| [34] |
SAUERMANN H, HAEUSSLER C. Authorship and contribution disclosures[J]. Science advances, 2017, 3(11): e1700404.
|
| [35] |
MARUŠIĆ A, BOŠNJAK L, JERONČIĆ A. A systematic review of research on the meaning, ethics and practices of authorship across scholarly disciplines[J]. Plos one, 2011, 6(9): e23477.
|
| [36] |
MAVIS B, DURNING S J, UIJTDEHAAGE S. Authorship order in medical education publications: in search of practical guidance for the community[J]. Teaching and learning in medicine, 2019, 31(3): 288-297.
|
| [37] |
MACIEJOVSKY B, BUDESCU D V, ARIELY D. Research note—the researcher as a consumer of scientific publications: how do name-ordering conventions affect inferences about contribution credits?[J]. Marketing science, 2009, 28(3): 589-598.
|
| [38] |
申琦.服务、合作与复刻：媒体等同理论视阈下的人机交互[J].西北师大学报(社会科学版),2022,59(3):106-115. (SHEN Q. Service, cooperation and replication: human-machine communication in media equation theory[J]. Journal of Northwest Normal University (social sciences),2022,59(3):106-115.)
|
| [39] |
张锐君,韩立新.我的AI恋人：媒介等同理论视域下人机亲密关系中的情感互动研究[J].采写编,2022(12):4-8. (ZHANG R J, HAN L X. My AI lover: a study of emotional interaction in human-machine intimacy from the perspective of media equivalence theory[J]. Journalism & media studies, 2022(12):4-8.)
|
| [40] |
CHIARELLA S G, TORROMINO G, GAGLIARDI D M, et al. Investigating the negative bias towards artificial intelligence: effects of prior assignment of AI-authorship on the aesthetic appreciation of abstract paintings[J]. Computers in human behavior, 2022, 137: 107406.
|
| [41] |
WANG Z, GUAN L, LIU G, et al. Generation of Chinese classical poetry based on pretrained model[C]// Proceedings of 2023 2nd International conference on big data, information and computer Network (BDICN). New York: IEEE, 2023: 182-185.
|
| [42] |
DE FILIPPO A, GIULIANI L, MANCINI E, et al. Towards symbiotic creativity: a methodological approach to compare human and AI robotic dance creations[C]// Proceedings of the thirty-second International conference on International joint conferences on artificial intelligence (IJCAI). Macao: IJCAI,2023: 5806-5814.
|
| [43] |
FORTUNA P, MODLIŃSKI A. A(I)rtist or counterfeiter? artificial intelligence as (D) evaluating factor on the art market[J]. The journal of arts management, law, and society, 2021, 51(3): 188-201.
|
| [44] |
LEDER H, BELKE B, OEBERST A, et al. A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments[J]. British journal of psychology, 2004, 95(4): 489-508.
|
| [45] |
EAKINS J P. Towards intelligent image retrieval[J]. Pattern recognition, 2002, 35(1): 3-14.
|
| [46] |
陈金菊,欧石燕.数字图像语义标注模型比较与分析[J].图书情报工作,2018,62(6):116-124. (CHEN J J, OU S Y. Comparison and analysis of digital image semantic annotation models[J]. Library and information service,2018,62(6):116-124.)
|
| [47] |
DEMMER T R, KÜHNAPFEL C, FINGERHUT J, et al. Does an emotional connection to art really require a human artist? Emotion and intentionality responses to AI-versus human-created art and impact on aesthetic experience[J]. Computers in human behavior, 2023, 148: 107875.
|
| [48] |
XU R, HSU Y. Discussion on the aesthetic experience of artificial intelligence creation and human art creation[C]//Proceedings of the 8th International conference on Kansei engineering and emotion research. Tokyo: Springer, 2020: 340-348.
|
| [49] |
RAGOT M, MARTIN N, COJEAN S. AI-generated vs. human artworks. a perception bias towards artificial intelligence?[C]// Proceedings of the extended abstracts of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2020: 1-10.
|
| [50] |
GUERREIRO R. Using artificial intelligence to create paintings: how type of artist impacts WTP through emotional intelligence and perceived quality[D]. Lisbon: Universidade Catolica Portuguesa (Portugal), 2022.
|
| [51] |
蒋忠波,师雪梅,张宏博.人机传播视域下算法新闻可信度的感知研究——基于一项对大学生的控制实验分析[J].国际新闻界,2022,44(3):34-52. (JIANG Z B, SHI X M, ZHANG H B. Analysis on perceived credibility of algorithmic news from perspective of the human-machine communication: based on a control experiment on college students[J]. Chinese journal of journalism & communication,2022,44(3):34-52.)
|
| [52] |
ZHENG Y, ZHONG B, YANG F. When algorithms meet journalism: the user perception to automated news in a cross-cultural context[J]. Computers in human behavior, 2018, 86: 266-275.
|
| [53] |
YANG T, SILVEIRA S, FORMULI A, et al. Aesthetic experiences across cultures: neural correlates when viewing traditional Eastern or Western landscape paintings[J]. Frontiers in psychology, 2019, 10: 798.
|
| [54] |
郭凤,任孝鹏,苏红.不同性别定向的名字对女性获得面试机会的影响[J].中国人力资源开发,2020,37(5):46-58. (GUO F, REN X P, SU H. The impact of gender orientation of names on the female applicants' interview opportunity[J]. Human resources development of China,2020,37(5):46-58.)
|
| [55] |
TAY B, JUNG Y, PARK T. When stereotypes meet robots: the double-edge sword of robot gender and personality in human–robot interaction[J]. Computers in human behavior, 2014, 38: 75-84.
|
| [56] |
FAUL F, ERDFELDER E, LANG A G, et al. G* Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences[J]. Behavior research methods, 2007, 39(2): 175-191.
|
| [57] |
石蕊,贾晓然,陈子宇,等.信息框架和媒介信任对公共卫生事件信息分享的影响机制研究——基于眼动追踪技术[J].情报杂志,2024,43(11):199-207.(SHI R, JIA X R, CHEN Z Y, et al. The impact mechanism of message framing and media trust on the public health events information sharing: a study based on eye-tracking[J]. Journal of intelligence, 2024,43(11):199-207.)
|
| [58] |
孙大力.中国古典园林的山水画情结[J].学术交流,2007(3):191-193. (SUN D L. The landscape painting complex of Chinese classical gardens[J]. Academic exchange,2007(3):191-193.)
|
| [59] |
童茵.数字人文范式框架与绘画文物AI智能研究[J].计算机产品与流通,2020(3):133-135. (TONG Y. Research on digital humanities paradigm framework and AI intelligence of painting cultural relics[J]. Computer products and circulation,2020(3):133-135.)
|
| [60] |
王平.明清“典故”和“临仿”类画题的兴起——山水画“画题”的数字人文研究[J].艺术理论与艺术史学刊,2018(2):103-127. (WANG P. The rise of “allusions” and “imitation” painting titles in Ming and Qing Dynasties: the study of digital humanities in landscape painting “painting titles”[J]. Journal of art theory & art history,2018(2):103-127.)
|
| [61] |
XUE A. End-to-end Chinese landscape painting creation using generative adversarial networks[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter conference on applications of computer vision. New York: IEEE, 2021: 3863-3871.
|
| [62] |
PASQUIER P, BURNETT A, THOMAS N G, et al. Investigating listener bias against musical metacreativity[C]//Proceedings of the seventh International conference on computational creativity. Paris: Sony CSL, 2016: 42-51.
|
| [63] |
SUNDAR S S. Multimedia effects on processing and perception of online news: a study of picture, audio, and video downloads[J]. Journalism & mass communication quarterly, 2000, 77(3): 480-499.
|
| [64] |
LOMBARD M, DITTON T B, WEINSTEIN L. Measuring presence: the temple presence inventory[C]//Proceedings of the 12th annual International workshop on presence. Los Angeles: International Society for Presence Research, 2009: 1-15.
|
| [65] |
ANNIE JIN S A. “My avatar behaves well and this feels right”: ideal and ought selves in video gaming[J]. Social behavior and personality: an international journal, 2011, 39(9): 1175-1182.
|
| [66] |
沈亚丹.无人自足之境——论中国山水画空间的非叙事性[J].天津社会科学,2024(4):126-135. (SHEN Y D. A realm of emptiness and self-sufficiency: on the non-narrative space of Chinese landscape painting[J]. Tianjin social sciences, 2024(4):126-135.)
|
| [67] |
孙辛欣,孙亚楠,赵宇翔,等.融入经验知识的人智交互方式对老年用户信任体验的影响[J].图书情报知识,2024,41(5):46-55. (SUN X X, SUN Y N, ZHAO Y X, et al. The effect of an empirical knowledge-based human-AI interaction approach on the trust experience of older adults[J]. Documentation, information & knowledge, 2024,41(5):46-55)
|
| [68] |
罗博,张晋朝.网络公共信息服务社会信任的影响因素研究[J].中国图书馆学报,2017,43(5):84-101. (LUO B, ZHANG J C. Study on the antecedents of social trust in public e-information service[J]. Journal of library science in China,2017,43(5):84-101.)
|
| [69] |
李新月,宋士杰,韩文婷,等.失真健康信息预先干预对个体感知与行为意愿影响的实证研究[J].信息资源管理学报,2024,14(1):44-54. (LI X Y, SONG S J, HAN W T, et al. An empirical study of the effects of a prebunking of health misinformation on individuals’ perceptions and behavioral intentions[J]. Journal of information resources management,2024,14(1):44-54.)
|
| [70] |
MILLET K, BUEHLER F, DU G, et al. Defending humankind: anthropocentric bias in the appreciation of AI art[J]. Computers in human behavior, 2023, 143: 107707.
|
| [71] |
WANG L. The subjective value of artistic creation in the age of artificial intelligence[C]// Proceedings of the 5th International conference on arts, design and contemporary education (ICADCE 2019). Paris: Atlantis Press, 2019: 60-64.
|
| [72] |
DOSHI A R, HAUSER O P. Generative AI enhances individual creativity but reduces the collective diversity of novel content[J]. Science advances, 2024, 10(28): eadn5290.
|
| [73] |
HARGREAVES D J. Musical imagination: perception and production, beauty and creativity[J]. Psychology of music, 2012, 40(5): 539-557.
|
| [74] |
CHE J, SUN X, GALLARDO V, et al. Cross-cultural empirical aesthetics[J]. Progress in brain research, 2018, 237: 77-103.
|
| [75] |
HOGG M A. Uncertainty–identity theory[J]. Advances in experimental social psychology, 2007, 39: 69-126.
|
| [76] |
CHI N T K, HOANG VU N. Investigating the customer trust in artificial intelligence: the role of anthropomorphism, empathy response, and interaction[J]. CAAI transactions on intelligence technology, 2023, 8(1): 260-273.
|
| [77] |
LUO X, TONG S, FANG Z, et al. Frontiers: machines vs. humans: the impact of artificial intelligence chatbot disclosure on customer purchases[J]. Marketing science, 2019, 38(6): 937-947.
|
| [78] |
LIU-THOMPKINS Y, OKAZAKI S, LI H. Artificial empathy in marketing interactions: bridging the human-AI gap in affective and social customer experience[J]. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 2022, 50(6): 1198-1218.
|
| [79] |
CHAMBERLAIN R, MULLIN C, SCHEERLINCK B, et al. Putting the art in artificial: aesthetic responses to computer-generated art[J]. Psychology of aesthetics, creativity, and the arts, 2018, 12(2): 177-192.
|
| [80] |
PHINNEY J S, ONG A D. Conceptualization and measurement of ethnic identity: current status and future directions[J]. Journal of counseling psychology, 2007, 54(3): 271-281.
|
陈 静：提出研究思路和方法，修改论文；
刘 奥：采集数据，撰写论文。
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
