[目的/意义] 当前，“内卷”的流行成为一种文化现象，其所反映的社会现实问题更值得关注。厘清“内卷”的概念及特点，从定量的角度衡量“内卷”，有助于分析“内卷”的形成机制并寻求其破解路径。[方法/过程] 首先，梳理“内卷”概念的演化过程；其次，结合大学生群体竞争场景提出“内卷”的定量测度；再次，从网络拓扑、竞合策略及价值评价3个方面探索不同策略对仿真系统“内卷”程度影响；最后，结合上述实验结果，分别从个体和群体层面提出相应建议。[结果/结论] 随着网络拓扑中随机性的降低，系统“内卷”竞争程度越来越大。合作型策略可以提升系统的总产出，竞争型策略的系统总投入高，系统总产出却较低。而对于价值评价，全局模式下其在高投入、低回报和边际效用递减等特点上表现突出，“内卷”严重。

[Purpose/Significance] At present, the popularity of "involution" has become a cultural phenomenon, and the social reality it reflects deserves attention. Clarify the concept and characteristics of "involution" and measure it from a quantitative perspective, which helps to quickly seek the formation mechanism of "involution" and the path to solve it. [Method/Process] At first, the study explained the evolution of the concept of "involution". Secondly, the evaluation index of "involution" is constructed in relation to the competition scenario of university students. Finally, we analyzed the experimental results, and gave corresponding suggestions from the three dimensions of individual and group. [Result/Conclusion] As the randomness in the network topology decreases, the degree of competition for the "involution" of the system increases. The cooperative strategy can improve the total output of the system, while the total system input of the competitive strategy is high, but the total output of the system is low. On the whole, the value evaluation under the global mode is outstanding in the characteristics of high investment, low return and diminishing marginal utility, and the "involution" is serious.