关系质量、众包质量与企业创新绩效关系研究——动态能力的调节效应

卢新元, 赵敏, 黄河, 黄梦梅

知识管理论坛 ›› 2018, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (3) : 130-139.

PDF(1794 KB)
PDF(1794 KB)
知识管理论坛 ›› 2018, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (3) : 130-139. DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.2095-5472.2018.013

关系质量、众包质量与企业创新绩效关系研究——动态能力的调节效应

作者信息 +

Reseacrh on the Relationship of Relationship Quality , Crowdsourcing Quality and Enterprise Innovation Performance:Moderating Role of Dynamic Capabilities

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

[目的/意义] 众包模式为企业外部创新提供了突破口,能降低企业创新成本、降低创新绩效,但目前企业运用众包模式的效果并不理想,需要提升。[方法/过程] 基于委托代理理论,将众包社群视为企业外部动态组织,深入分析企业与众包社群的关系质量对企业创新绩效的作用机制,并在此基础上考察众包质量的中介作用和企业动态能力的调节效应。[结果/结论] 研究结果表明,关系质量对创新绩效无直接显著影响,众包质量在其中发挥了中介作用,企业的适应能力对关系质量有一定的调节作用,经调节后的关系质量能提升企业创新绩效;众包质量对企业创新绩效有显著直接作用,且企业的吸收能力和创新能力对众包质量与众包创新绩效直接的关系有正向调节作用;动态能力能有效调节众包质量的中介作用,使其在关系质量与创新绩效直接起部分中介作用。

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] The model of Crowdsourcing provides a breakthrough for enterprise external innovation, which can reduce the cost of innovation and reduce innovation performance. However, the effect of public package mode is not ideal at present, and it needs to be promoted. [Method/process] Based on the principal-agent theory, this paper regarded crowdsourcing community as external dynamic organization, carried out in depth analysis on the action mechanism that relationship quality between enterprise and crowdsourcing community act on innovation performance, Then, it investigated the mediating effects of crowdsourcing quality and the moderating effect of enterprises’ dynamic capabilities. [Result/conclusion] The results show that: The relationship quality has no significant effect on innovation performance, crowdsourcing quality play a mediating role, the adaptability of enterprises has a moderating effect on the relationship quality, and adjusted relationship quality can improve the enterprise innovation performance; The crowdsourcing quality performance has a significant direct on innovation performance, and moreover, absorptive capacity and innovation capability of enterprises have positive moderating effect on the relationship between relationship quality and innovation performance; Dynamic capabilities can effectively regulate the mediating effects of crowdsourcing quality, so that it can directly play a partial mediation role between relationship quality and innovation performance.

关键词

关系质量 / 众包质量 / 创新绩效 / 动态能力

Key words

relationship quality / crowdsourcing quality / innovation performance / dynamic capabilitiy

引用本文

导出引用
卢新元 , 赵敏 , 黄河 , . 关系质量、众包质量与企业创新绩效关系研究——动态能力的调节效应[J]. 知识管理论坛. 2018, 3(3): 130-139 https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.2095-5472.2018.013
LU Xinyuan , ZHAO Min , HUANG He , et al. Reseacrh on the Relationship of Relationship Quality , Crowdsourcing Quality and Enterprise Innovation Performance:Moderating Role of Dynamic Capabilities[J]. Knowledge Management Forum. 2018, 3(3): 130-139 https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.2095-5472.2018.013
中图分类号: F23.1   

参考文献

[1]
MORTARA L, FORD S J, JAEGER M. Idea Competitions under scrutiny: acquisition, intelligence or public relations mechanism?[J]. Technological forecasting & social change, 2013, 80(8):1563-1578.
[2]
DOAN A, RAMAKRISHNAM R, HALEVY A Y. Crowdsourcing systems on the World-Wide Web[M]. New York: ACM , 2011.
[3]
ZHENG H, LI D, HOU W. Task design, motivation, and participation in crowdsourcing contests[J]. International journal of electronic commerce, 2011, 15(4):57-88.
[4]
GEFEN D , GEFEN G, CARMEL E. How project description length and expected duration affect bidding and project success in crowdsourcing software development[J]. Journal of systems & software, 2016, 116(6):75-84.
[5]
郑海超,侯文华. 网上创新竞争研究综述[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2011, 32(1):82-88.
[6]
许娟娟. 网络众包模式对中小企业创新绩效的影响研究[D]. 新乡:河南师范大学,2016.
[7]
ZHANG X, ZHENG Z, HUANG K, et al. Organizational culture, inter-organizational learning ability and innovation performance of the technology alliance of small and medium enterprises[C]// IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management. Bangkok, Thailand: IEEE, 2014:29-33.
[8]
夏恩君,魏星,赵轩雏,等. 企业众包模式参与效果影响因素研究[J]. 科技与管理, 2016, 18(4):1-7.
[9]
孟韬,张媛,董大海. 基于威客模式的众包参与行为影响因素研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2014(12):112-123.
[10]
朱沆,张威,何轩,等. 家族、市场化与创业企业关系网络的交易成本[J]. 南开管理评论, 2012, 15(5):152-160.
[11]
曾萍,邓腾智,宋铁波. 社会资本、动态能力与企业创新关系的实证研究[J]. 科研管理, 2013, 34(4):50-59.
[12]
KOMAROV S, REINECKE K, GAJOS K Z. Crowdsourcing performance evaluations of user interfaces[C]// Sigchi conference on human factors in computing systems. New York: ACM, 2013:207-216.
[13]
CROSBY L A, EVANS K R, Cowles D. Relationship quality in service selling: an interpersonal influence perspective[J]. Journal of marketing, 1990, 54(3):68-81.
[14]
HENNING -THURAU T , KLEE A. The impact of customer satisfaction and relationship quality on customer retention: a critical reassessment and model development[J]. Psychology & Marketing, 1997, 14(8):737-764.
[15]
杨水利,郑建志,李韬奋. 动态能力关系质量与合作绩效实证研究[J]. 经济管理, 2008(z1):133-138.
[16]
MOHR J, SPEKMAN R. Characteristics of partnership success: partnership attributes, communication behavior, and conflict resolution techniques[J]. Strategic management journal, 1994, 15(2):135-152.
[17]
ANDREJA KRIZMAN. Involvement, knowledge sharing and proactive improvement as antecedents of logistics outsourcing performance[J]. Economic & business review, 2010, 11(3):233-256.
[18]
ROY S K, ESHGI A, GANGULI S. Service quality and customer satisfaction: an empirical investigation in indian mobile telecommunications services[J]. Marketing management journal, 2008,18(2):119-144.
[19]
洪志生,苏强,霍佳震. 服务质量管理研究的回顾与现状探析[J]. 管理评论, 2012, 24(7):154-165.
[20]
GRONROOS C. A service quality model and its marketing implications[J]. European journal of marketing, 1984, 18(4):36-44.
[21]
GOLICIC S L. A comparison of shipper and carrier relationship strength[J]. International journal of physical distribution & logistics management, 2007, 37(9):719-739.
[22]
GONCALVES J, FERREIRA D, HOSIO S, et al. Crowdsourcing on the spot: altruistic use of public displays, feasibility, performance, and behaviours[C]// ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. New York: ACM, 2013:753-762.
[23]
FAN J, Li G, OOI B C, et al. ICrowd: an adaptive crowdsourcing framework Fan J, Li G, Ooi B C, et al. iCrowd: An Adaptive Crowdsourcing Framework[C]// ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. New York: ACM, 2015:1015-1030.
[24]
YU H, SHEN Z , MIAO C, et al. A reputation-aware decision-making approach for improving the efficiency of crowdsourcing systems[C]// International conference on autonomous agents and Multi-Agent systems. Richland: AAMAS '13. 2013:1315-1316.
[25]
鲁琨,高强. 创新、服务质量与绩效:B2C电子商务业实证研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2009, 27(7):1110-1120.
[26]
TALB F , RAHMAN Z, QURESHI M N. An empirical investigation of relationship between total quality management practices and quality performance in Indian service companies[J]. International journal of quality & reliability management, 2016, 30(3):280-318.
[27]
刘锋,张玲玲,顾基发. 知识管理在互联网中的应用― ―威客模式在中国[J]. Iskss, 2007,4(4):.32-41
[28]
SHARPE. M. E. Inc. OIL-Mill[J]. Journal of management information systems, 1999,4(15):29-61.
[29]
刘学元,丁雯婧,赵先德. 企业创新网络中关系强度、吸收能力与创新绩效的关系研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2016, 19(1):30-42.
[30]
PALVIA P C, KING R C, XIA W, et al. Capability, quality, and performance of offshore IS vendors: a theoretical framework and empirical investigation[J]. Decision sciences, 2010, 41(2):231–270.
[31]
WANG C L, AHEMD P K. Dynamic capabilities: a review and research agenda[J]. International journal of management reviews, 2007, 9(1):31-51.
[32]
李翔,陈继祥,张春辉. 动态能力影响创新模式选择的机理研究:市场导向与企业家导向的中介作用[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2013, 1(5):36-43.
[33]
DAVIS F D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology[J]. Mis quarterly, 1989, 13(3):319-340.
[34]
NONAKA I , TAKEUCHI H. The knowledge-creating company: how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation[J]. Long range planning, 1996, 29(4):196-201.
[35]
GEMUNDEN H G, RITTER T, HEYDEBRECK P. Network configuration and innovation success: an empirical analysis in German high-tech industries[J]. International journal of research in marketing, 1995, 13(5):449-462.
[36]
GEOFFREY G. BELL G. Clusters, networks, and firm innovativeness[J]. Strategic management journal, 2005, 26(3):287-295.

作者贡献说明

卢新元: 指导论文、整体把握;

赵敏: 论文分析、模型确定及内容撰写;

黄河: 提出论文修改建议;

黄梦梅: 参与论文修改。


编辑: 徐健
PDF(1794 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/