【目的/意义】 鉴于学界存在的引文失范术语模糊混淆的问题，旨在提出一个引文失范术语的概念分析框架，用于引文失范术语的分类与定义，以促进我国科研诚信建设，提高学术规范水平。 【方法/过程】 系统梳理国内外学术文献与政策文本中对引文失范类型的术语表述，提炼其定义特征与使用语境，构建了包含“科研不端/科研不当”与“增加被引量/减少被引量/不影响被引量”的分类维度框架和“动机—过程—效用”三要素的内涵要素框架。 【结果/结论】 依托引文失范的概念分析框架，整合并重构引文失范的标准化术语体系，确立11个一级核心术语，即媚引、滥引、引文污染、错引、漏引、引文偏倚、引文复制、曲引、匿引、引文操纵和伪引，并明确各术语在动机、过程、效用三要素上的特征，为后续的制度化治理提供更具操作性的工具。

[Purpose/Significance] In response to the persistent ambiguity and conflation of terminology surrounding citation breaches in academic discourse, this study aims to propose a conceptual analytical framework for the classification and definition of citation breach terms, in order to promote research integrity in China and strengthen academic norms. [Method/Process] By systematically reviewing academic literature and policy documents from both domestic and international sources, the article extracts definitional features and usage contexts of citation breach terms. It constructs a dual-dimensional classification framework based on "research misconduct/questionable research practices" and "increase citation count/decrease citation count/no impact on citation count", alongside a three-element conceptual framework comprising "motivation–process–utility". [Result/Conclusion] Grounded in this framework, the article integrates and reconstructs the terminology system for citation breaches, establishing 11 primary core terms—honorary citation, excessive citation, citation contamination, referencing error, unintentional citation omission, citation bias, citation copying, citation misrepresentation, citation manipulation, concealed citation, fabricated citation—and clarifies the characteristics of each term across the dimensions of motivation, process, and utility. This provides a more operational tool for future institutional governance.